This abrupt turn from a causal theory of consciousness to talk about
emergent properties not only leaves the puzzle about causality dangling, it compounds the mystery by evoking still more elementary puzzles about the meaning of emergence and evolution, as well as about how and where to locate sentience in an evolving «physical world.»
Not exact matches
Rather, like any
emergent property born of «
N - dimensional» variables, it is far more complex than your oversimplification suggests.
This hard dualism appeals to few scientists; so we need
not be surprised that there is a tendency to insist that the additional psychical concepts are mere complications, or mere «
emergent properties,» which should
not influence our basic conception of reality or knowledge.
Leclerc asserts the notion of
emergent properties resulting from action in several places, and he is quite clear that these
emergent properties are
not mere mixtures of the
properties that go to make them up; they are new creations, qualitatively different from their constituents.
Suarez would urge, against the notion that there are
emergent properties of a compound which are
not simply the mixture of the
properties of its constituents, that all the real
properties of a composite must be found within its constituents; the essential being of the composite can in no way transcend its constituents as united (MD 36, 3, 7).
Therefore any
emergent properties and substances would
not arise form a complex ordering of smaller substances.
The researchers suggest that this finding adds to a growing body of evidence that suggests consciousness doesn't live in any one area of the brain, but is instead an
emergent property of many parts working together.
What's more, if we regard consciousness as an
emergent property of a complex system, we can
not take the position that it is just another attribute (along with «digestion and lactation,» to quote philosopher John Searle).
If you accept the leap of faith that a nonbiological entity that is convincing in its reactions to qualia is conscious, then you accept my conclusion that consciousness is an
emergent property of the overall pattern of an entity,
not the substrate it runs on.
Chemistry doesn't prefer anything, it proceeds «forward» based on specific conditions and certain
properties (remember physicsàchemistryàbiologyàphysiology with each later phenomena an
emergent one from the previous one)
In other words, the switch from print to digital is an
emergent property of the changing ecosystem,
not a matter of consumer preference.»
Whether or
not relative humidity is conserved is going to effect its magnitude, but this is
not an assumption as you put it, but an
emergent property of models.
However, we don't calibrate the
emergent properties of the GCMs to the
emergent properties derived from observations — they stay (more or less) as evaluation targets.
All of the interesting sensitivities are
emergent properties, and I assure you that they are
not simply tunable based on intuition.
I think it is over the heads of Myron Ebell's intended audience, however, and it may be necessary to write an overview — at high - school level — that explains the relative value of inductive and deductive methods in science, use of multi-compartment models in general, the sorts of problems they regularly entail (formulation, measurement,
n - body calculation, brute - force computer simulation, experimental repetition, real - world validation,
emergent properties, catastrophic regime - shift, assignment of probabilities, etc.) and how these are variously or provisionally overcome, according to the science you are practicing.
Refraction, specifically the real component of refraction
n (describes bending of rays, wavelength changes relative to a vacuum, affects blackbody fluxes and intensities — as opposed to the imaginary component, which is related to absorption and emission) is relatively unimportant to shaping radiant fluxes through the atmosphere on Earth (except on the small scale processes where it (along with difraction, reflection) gives rise to scattering, particularly of solar radiation — in that case, the effect on the larger scale can be described by scattering
properties, the
emergent behavior).
The climate system as a whole is one of those topics where complexity is intrinsic, and while the behaviour of simpler systems or subsystems is fascinating, one can't avoid looking directly at the
emergent properties of the whole system — of which the actual temperature changes from month to month are but one.
The sequence of chemical reactions that enable aqua regia to dissolve gold is remarkable, and depends on chemical structures, but the unique ability to dissolve gold is an
emergent property, of a sort that essentialists have
not much discussed.
In the latter case, the whole exhibits «
emergent properties» that are
not implied by its component parts.
Although theirs a lot of rooms for breakthroughs since AI is a
emergent property so we won't create AI it will just happen.
This connection is
not an
emergent property of the model's physics, since we don't really know enough about the H2O cycle to model it — instead this feedback connection is one of the many «Parameters» in the model that are adjusted to attempt to match the prior data.
As they admit (when
not thinking about its implications), ENSO is an «
emergent property» in the Gaia Models.
CS can
not be observed directly, it is an
emergent property of a complex system when it is perturbed in either sense by any forcing.
They are
not simulated in the climate models because
emergent properties can
not be simulated without adequate understanding of the
emergent behaviour.
And philosophers do study strange things, like this: -LSB-...] The sequence of chemical reactions that enable aqua regia to dissolve gold is remarkable, and depends on chemical structures, but the unique ability to dissolve gold is an
emergent property, of a sort that essentialists have
not much discussed.
The complex function between the two makes temperature an
emergent property of the climate system, but we needn't get too wrapped up in this.
Moreover, like a folksonomy, the common law works instance by instance and is an
emergent property,
not entirely predictable, always coming into existence without arriving; it's a bottom - up process operating via solicitor's letter, argument, negotiation, lawsuit etc. case by case by case.