Since 2000, ExxonMobil has spent approximately $ 8 billion to develop lower -
emission energy solutions.
All told, Exxon has spent $ 7 billion to develop lower -
emission energy solutions during the last fifteen years.
Not exact matches
Recognizing that carbon
emissions resulting from consumption of these fuels is driving catastrophic global climate change, my role as leader of the company is to ensure that Virgin provides financial support to non-profit groups that are exploring renewable
energy and seeking market - based
solutions to climate change, like the Carbon War Room.
Whether you're looking for the latest content on the impacts of climate change, the fossil industries that produce the
emissions, renewable
energy and
energy efficiency alternatives, or climate
solutions outside
energy, you've come to the right place.
For example, developing clean
energy solutions can help control
emissions while allowing an economy to grow.
An international chemical and advanced materials company, Solvay assists its customers in innovating, developing and delivering high - value, sustainable products and
solutions which consume less
energy and reduce CO2
emissions, optimize the use of resources and improve the quality of life.
Natural, regenerative
solutions such as the BIDA ® System offer a new paradigm for water treatment systems, delivering closed - loop mechanisms that efficiently process wastewater on site and restore it to beneficial use, without significant
energy output or
emissions.
«Under Governor Cuomo's leadership, communities across the State are incorporating sustainability and good
energy solutions into their projects, reducing greenhouse gas
emissions and
energy costs, and boosting jobs and investment.»
«technology - driven, market - based
solutions that will decrease
emissions, reduce excess greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, increase
energy efficiency, mitigate the impact of climate change where it occurs, and maximize any ancillary benefits climate change might offer for the economy.»
Municipalities worldwide are exploiting a host of creative
solutions to reduce
energy consumption, water use, waste and
emissions, while also making it easier for people to get around
WMG is analysing the suitability for micro / mild hybridisation (MMH)-- a feasible
solution that represents a simple, low - cost implementation to create high fuel efficiency with less
energy use and fewer
emissions.
This is a global challenge, and an effective
solution will require countries around the world to do their part to reduce
emissions and bring about a global clean -
energy future.
Furthermore, the transition to
emission - free
energy forms in transportation requires specific
solutions for
energy storage, and lithium - ion batteries are considered to have the best potential.
The irony is that this electrical
energy is already potentially available at the top of the power station chimney, because on release one «
solution» of greenhouse gas — in the stack's
emissions — mixes with a different - strength
solution — in the ambient air — all the time.
«This
energy efficiency will in turn reduce overall greenhouse
emissions and promote sustainable transportation
solutions.»
The Senior ECPA Fellows Program seeks to facilitate the transfer of knowledge between the U.S. and Latin America in innovative
solutions and technologies related to the areas of clean
energy, sustainable urban development, climate change adaptation, and reducing
emission from deforestation.
Eileen Claussen, president of the Center for Climate and
Energy Solutions (C2ES), said «Chevrolet's goal to invest millions in energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other lower - carbon projects to reduce U.S. emissions by up to 8 million metric tons demonstrates innovative corporate leade
Energy Solutions (C2ES), said «Chevrolet's goal to invest millions in
energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other lower - carbon projects to reduce U.S. emissions by up to 8 million metric tons demonstrates innovative corporate leade
energy efficiency, renewable
energy, and other lower - carbon projects to reduce U.S. emissions by up to 8 million metric tons demonstrates innovative corporate leade
energy, and other lower - carbon projects to reduce U.S.
emissions by up to 8 million metric tons demonstrates innovative corporate leadership.
It deals directly with the problem (the fossil fuel
emissions), can be integrated easily into existing
energy infrastructure and can along with a portfolio of non-fossil
solutions, deliver stabilisation levela at or below 550ppm - provided we start now in earnest.
If they can make it work, it'd be the idea
solution for NYC, eliminating the
emissions from the transportation of waste out of state, recycling nearly 100 % of waste into either new products,
energy or building material.
Corn grain ethanol is not a
solution due to low net
energy gain, GHG
emissions, environmental degradation (e.g., water pollution and soil loss), and food supply issues) and cellulosic ethanol doesn't look favorable due to
energy density issues and GHG
emissions.
Oil shale is not a
solution given its
energy and water extraction demands, environmental destruction (including residues), and GHG
emissions.
Global Warming The experts considered four
solutions in this area: investing only in mitigation of greenhouse - gas
emissions; investing in mitigation and research and development into low ‐ carbon
energy technology; investing only in research and development into low ‐ carbon
energy technology; investing in a combination of mitigation, research and development and adaptation.
Kunz laid out a pretty convincing case for high speed rail as the
solution for a number of problems facing American transportation, including outdated infrastructure, peak oil (or «
energy independence,» depending how you look at it), out of control carbon
emissions, and more.
So the
solution to CO2
emissions must lie in a new way for post-combustion CO2 capture out of flue gas, followed by CO2 cracking using the otherwise wasted
energy of renewables.
It's not because there is indeed a climate problem with our CO2
emissions that there must exist any palatable «
solution» for 7 + billion people to this problem in general and even worse in terms of renewable
energy sources in particular.
Implement the Global Climate Change Initiative: Undertaking a pragmatic, whole - of - government approach to speed the transition to a low - carbon, climate - resilient future, including (1) promoting clean
energy solutions; (2) slowing, halting, and reversing
emissions from land use; and (3) helping the most vulnerable countries strengthen climate resilience.
In fact, the report shows that we can achieve big reductions at low cost, using flexible
solutions that drive investment in clean
energy to reduce carbon
emissions 26 percent by 2020, saving lives and creating clean
energy jobs across the country.
Carbon removal
solutions will be necessary to transform the economy to generate negative
emissions, as more traditional climate mitigation strategies (such as renewable
energy,
energy efficiency, avoided deforestation, etc.) can only get us to zero
emissions — not below zero.
The key problem with this «moral hazard» argument is the hypothesis that «cost - effective, proven, scaleable CDR
solutions» are poised to proliferate at greater rates than GHG
emission mitigation technologies (such as renewable
energy and
energy efficiency) that are required to decarbonize our economy.
In 2014 alone, reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the International
Energy Agency, the UN Sustainable Solutions Network and the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate argued for a doubling or trebling of nuclear energy — requiring as many as 1,000 new reactors or more in view of scheduled retirements — to stabilize carbon emissions e.g. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III — Mitigation of Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/, Presentation, slides 32 - 33; International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2014, p. 396; UN Sustainable Solutions Network, «Pathways to Deep Decarbonization» (July 2014), at page 33; Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, «Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report» (September 2014), Figure 5 at pa
Energy Agency, the UN Sustainable
Solutions Network and the Global Commission on the Economy and Climate argued for a doubling or trebling of nuclear
energy — requiring as many as 1,000 new reactors or more in view of scheduled retirements — to stabilize carbon emissions e.g. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III — Mitigation of Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/, Presentation, slides 32 - 33; International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2014, p. 396; UN Sustainable Solutions Network, «Pathways to Deep Decarbonization» (July 2014), at page 33; Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, «Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report» (September 2014), Figure 5 at pa
energy — requiring as many as 1,000 new reactors or more in view of scheduled retirements — to stabilize carbon
emissions e.g. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Working Group III — Mitigation of Climate Change, http://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg3/, Presentation, slides 32 - 33; International
Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2014, p. 396; UN Sustainable Solutions Network, «Pathways to Deep Decarbonization» (July 2014), at page 33; Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, «Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report» (September 2014), Figure 5 at pa
Energy Agency, World
Energy Outlook 2014, p. 396; UN Sustainable Solutions Network, «Pathways to Deep Decarbonization» (July 2014), at page 33; Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, «Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report» (September 2014), Figure 5 at pa
Energy Outlook 2014, p. 396; UN Sustainable
Solutions Network, «Pathways to Deep Decarbonization» (July 2014), at page 33; Global Commission on the Economy and Climate, «Better Growth, Better Climate: The New Climate Economy Report» (September 2014), Figure 5 at page 26.
Even if CO2 Scorecard is correct that the effect of natural gas on
emissions has been less than previously believed, delivering one quarter of U.S. carbon cuts is still «pretty significant,» said Michael Tubman, a senior fellow at the Center for Climate and
Energy Solutions (C2ES), a nonprofit policy organization.
June 29: «
Solutions for Taking on Transportation - Related GHG
Emissions,» by Robert Earley, Clean Transportation Program Director at the Innovation Center for
Energy and Transportation (iCET)
Biomass - to -
energy is a sustainable
solution that can reduce greenhouse gas
emissions to the atmosphere, assuming that secondary and tertiary biomass is used (rather than crops grown primarily for biomass fuel) to substitute the use of fossil fuels.
Because of the obvious problems in using biomass for
energy, many stakeholders have started arguing that bioenergy should only be used temporarily in a transition period towards a low
emission society, but this will bind investments in false
solutions ``.
As we near mid-century, Bob Perciasepe, president of the Center for Climate and
Energy Solutions, said it's become clearer that fossil fuels and carbon
emissions are sticking around.
We can reach that goal through immediate and sustained action to reduce our heat - trapping
emissions like adopting technologies that increase
energy efficiency, expanding our use of renewable
energy, and slowing deforestation (among other
solutions).
Were cost - effective CDR
solutions available at large scale, however, developing countries could continue to rely on fossil fuel
energy sources until the business case for renewable
energy improved, so long as CDR were deployed to offset fossil
emissions associated with this transition.
Together we can reduce carbon
emissions by adopt viable climate
solutions — such as ditching dirty fossil fuels and embracing renewable
energy.
«Those Stubborn Facts: Bill Gates Confirms Analysis of Google Experts - Renewable
Energy Is Failed
Solution Main Climate FactCheck: CO2
Emissions Growth Has No Impact On Atmospheric CO2 Growth»
To resolve this logjam, indirect methods of decarbonization — such as a portfolio of low - cost CDR
solutions — could enable fossil companies both to meet steep
emission reduction targets and provide low - cost fossil
energy until direct decarbonization through renewable
energy systems become more cost - competitive (especially in difficult to decarbonize areas such as long - haul trucking and aviation).
While the Climate Change pundits agree that
energy efficiency and renewables are in the long term, «the most sustainable
solutions both for security of supply and climate,» they argue that «global greenhouse gas
emissions can not be reduced by at least 50 % by 2050, as they need to be, if we do not also use other options such as carbon capture and storage.»
A combination of technology and policy
solutions could provide a pathway to reduce direct carbon dioxide
emissions from the cement industry by 24 % below current levels by 2050, according to a new report by the International
Energy Agency (IEA) and the Cement Sustainability Initiative (CSI).
As
energy efficiency is the largest piece of the GHG
emissions reduction
solution, improving
energy efficiency in buildings is a priority.
He feared that the scale of carbon
emissions is «simply too enormous,» and the only possible
solution is to start a large nuclear
energy campaign.
Commentary: Clean and efficient heat for industry There is no single
solution for reducing
energy demand and
emissions from industrial heat use 23 January 2018
Levine's conclusion — which I am reprinting below — was that to be a «responsible participant and part of the
solution» to the climate change challenge, the company should continue research, support
energy efficiency, reduce
emissions, and pursue new technologies.
Wind
energy also acts as a leading
solution to climate change, the greatest threat to all wildlife, by greatly reducing carbon dioxide
emissions and other pollutants in nearly every state.
d) You could have a positive effect on reducing global GHG
emissions if you put your effort into advocating for
solutions that are currently too expensive because of ideology, fear - mongering, misinformation, etc — i.e. nuclear
energy.
The study pins great hopes on the ability of carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) to reconcile coal's importance as an
energy source and its contributions to CO2
emissions, joining OPEC, Midwestern Governors, and BP in hoping CCS will prove to be an economically viable
solution for cleaning up fossil fuel
emissions.
With about 90 % of the carbon
emissions from our electricity sector coming from coal fired power stations, Australia will need to look beyond just coal towards the full spectrum of available
energy solutions.