Sentences with phrase «emission figures given»

Audi A6 Sedan: Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 7.1 — 5.5 (33.1 — 42.8 mpg); Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 161 — 142 (259.1 — 228.5 g / mi) Fuel consumption and CO2 emission figures given in ranges depending on the tires / wheels used

Not exact matches

According to the figure that I have been given by Ministers, they expect annual emissions from motor vehicles to reduce by 160,000 tonnes a year by 2020.

The figure is also about 10 per cent less than the estimate given for China in the most recent publication of the Global Carbon Project, which updates annually the global carbon emissions and their implications for future trends.

That ups the headline power and torque figures to 335bhp and 332 lb ft, but reduces emissions and improves fuel economy to 149g / km and 44.1 mpg, supposedly giving you the best of both worlds in terms of performance and parsimony.

These systems maximize efficiency and low - end torque, giving sparkling performance while also maintaining EPA - rated mileage figures of 23mpg in the city and 32mpg on the highway, as well as a LEV - 2 CARB emissions rating.

The 1.5 - litre dCi 90 diesel Captur is the most economical model and while Renault hasn't released fuel economy figures yet for the 2018 version, CO2 emissions of 138g / km give it a 32 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.

Combined with a number of further technologies developed in the overall context of BMW EfficientDynamics, the engine gives the BMW X6 xDrive50i fuel consumption and emission figures significantly better than other eight - cylinder vehicles competing with the BMW X Models.

Combined fuel consumption in l / 100 km: 6.5 — 5.6 (36.2 — 42.0 US mpg) Combined CO2 emissions in g / km: 172 — 149 (276.8 — 239.8 g / mi)(Figures on the fuel consumption and the CO2 - emissions vary in case of given ranges depending on the used combination of wheels / tires.)

# 123 The key is in the next sentence in the paragraph which gives the context for the figure: «To put these emissions in perspective, the amount of carbon taken up by vegetation is about 2.6 Pg per year.

The Global Warming Potential (GWP) is defined as the time - integrated RF due to a pulse emission of a given component, relative to a pulse emission of an equal mass of CO2 (Figure 8.28 a and formula).

At the same time, the uncertainty range for any given scenario family is also substantial, as indicated by the range of 2100 emissions for the A1, A2, and B1 scenario families in Figure 5 - 5.

Thus, the allowed emissions for a given temperature target are uncertain (see Figure 12.45)(Matthews et al., 2009; Zickfeld et al., 2009; Knutti and Plattner, 2012).

A sample emission pathway for each of the plots above is given in figure 1, alongside its resultant warming trajectory.

The SDS has the same emissions profile as the IEA's Copenhagen - era 450 Scenario (450S), which gives only a 50 percent chance of keeping warming below 2 degrees Celsius (Figure ES - 3).

Changes in CO2 emissions attributed to Kaya Identity factors from 2015 to 2016 compared with the trend from the prior decade: This figure gives context to the most recent year ‐ to ‐ year change by comparing it to the average change for key parameters over the previous decade.

The sources of uncertainty are many, including the trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions in the future, their conversion into atmospheric concentrations, the range of responses of various climate models to a given radiative forcing and the method of constructing high resolution information from global climate model outputs (Pittock, 1995; see Figure 13.2).

Every year, one of the projects I give my students is to figure out how the global community can address the climate risk, given that it requires concerted global action, that some countries cause more emissions per capita than others, that some are endowed with abundant fossil fuel resources, and that some are richer than others.

Instead of helping the cause for reducing CO2 emissions, lack of transparency and proper notes might lead to the reverse effect, creating more trouble and giving more arguments to people who criticise the validity of facts and figures.

Ramanathan and Feng gave a figure greater than 2 degrees for this zero emissions scenario, but they also zeroed out aerosol pollution too.

I felt I should add that we would have to replace those panels in the desert often and figure out how to dispose of all those wastes and the emissions given off producing those panels.

The figures you refer to give the total CO2 - emissions per square meter of solar panel, regardless of their energy production.