With strict
emission laws about to take place in Europe, supercar manufacturers in the region must figure out how to reduce their CO2 averages.
Not exact matches
Right now, a major climate fight is blowing up in Australia — the government is
about to pass a
law that would cut carbon
emissions and get polluters to pay.
Jessica Wentz, associate director and a postdoctoral research fellow at Columbia University's Sabin Center for Climate Change
Law, wrote in a blog post that the phrasing shift is more technically precise and likely addresses concerns
about how far an agency needs to go in calculating
emissions.
Over the past year, governments have been making pledges
about how they will cut
emissions, and one of the main outcomes from Paris will be a new agreement that codifies all those national efforts into international
law.
We have a total of 500 climate
laws that cover
about 90 per cent of
emissions.
But what
about tomorrow, when new mobility requirements and tougher
emissions laws redefine the pleasure of driving and reassess the meaningfulness of performance?
In any case, in reading these arguments, I find it hard to believe that anyone who cares
about GLOBAL greenhouse gas
emissions / concentrations could cheer the
law, and — if so — I'd have to ask why?
We will know if the Obama Administration is truly serious
about pursuing a 28 % reduction in America's GHG
emissions by 2025 only if we see President Obama issuing formal directions to the EPA to use its full regulatory authority to the maximum extent currently allowed by
law in suppressing US carbon
emissions.
While the Democratic leadership of the waning 111th Congress failed to get legislation passed into
law to address climate change, the House global warming committee, led by Rep. Ed Markey (D - MA), convened dozens of important hearings and briefings featuring top climate scientists and national security experts to educate Congress and the public
about the need for swift action to secure America's energy independence, create clean energy jobs and mitigate climate change
emissions.
About emissions and temperature as drivers in ice cores, here are two graphs comparing total
emissions with total CO2 increase and temperature with total CO2 increase, as measured in ice cores (
Law Dome and others) 1900 - 1959: and
With Kyoto now passed into
law and the European
Emissions Trading System
about to enter into force, the business lobby is increasingly tantalized by the prospect of carbon trading.
Observations of earth
emission spectra seen outside the atmosphere from satellites should co0ntain components that are emitted from surface that are 333 K or even higher; and this is important since the Wien displacement
Law, would shift these
emission peaks even further away from the CO2 15 micron nand as the spectral peak moves from its nominal 10.1 microns at 288 K down to
about 8.7 microns at 333 K.
They should never be used to set or justify policies,
laws or regulations — such as what the Environmental Protection Agency is
about to impose on CO2
emissions from coal - fired power plants.
Skeptics do not agree
about very much except a few generalities: the absorption /
emission spectra of gases measured in laboratories; the
laws of thermodynamics, etc..
Most (
about 2/3) of the recent recession of the glacier occurred between 1860 and 1957 and can not be ascribed to the anthropic
emissions of CO2 which were then insignificant: 0,083 Gt - C in 1859, 1,3 Gt - C in 1940 and 2,2 Gt - C in 1956 with an assumed CO2 content of the air - from
Law Dome ice core - of 286 ppm in 1859, 310 ppm in 1940 and 314 ppm in 1956.
The list includes former Utah Governor Jon Huntsman, who spoke
about climate change on the 2012 presidential campaign trail; Senator John McCain, who proposed a series of climate change legislation in the mid-2000s; former California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who signed an
emissions - reduction
law for his state in 2006; and former Reagan Secretary of State George Shultz, who writes
about climate and other issues as a fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution.
After all, it makes perfect sense that something that is nearly a blackbody at a temperature of
about 15 C will emit only 50 W / m ^ 2 of
emission (gross)... at least once you repeal a few
laws of physics that were never much use to us anyway!
You might even need to be made aware of
laws about emissions and inspections or the amount of tint allowed to your vehicle's windows.