Zero -
emission technology most typically involved the vision of coal gasification, in which pollutants would be separated out of the emissions stream prior to combustion, together with carbon capture and sequestration, in which carbon dioxide would be liquified and stored permanently underground.
Not exact matches
The study, published online today in Environmental Science &
Technology, provides the
most comprehensive set yet of direct measurements of
emissions from the distribution system and, with a series of partner studies, is helping to determine the natural gas industry's contribution to U.S. greenhouse gas
emissions and to global warming.
They have caused
most of the buildup of gases to date, and they have the largest per capita
emissions, the greatest wealth and the
most technology.
«This is the
most efficient way of resolving climate change, not just a tax and not just
technology because there's no guarantee
emissions go down,» Hochschild continued.
A leader in this quest is German - based automaker DaimlerChrysler, which recently introduced BLUETEC
technology — a modular exhaust treatment system that cuts nitrogen oxide and soot output significantly, enabling cars to meet the
most stringent U.S.
emission standards.
«Due to advanced
technology used at U.S. - based coal burning power plants, mandated by the Clean Air Act and the Environmental Protection Agency,
most of these nanoparticles and other tiny particles are removed before the final
emission of the plant's exhaust gases,» Hochella said.
The findings, published online in the journal Environmental Science &
Technology, could lead to more efficient strategies for sampling
emissions and fixing the
most significant leaks, said Brandt, who is also a senior fellow at Stanford's Precourt Institute for Energy.
But Haszeldine says a similar
technology — scrubbing sulphur dioxide pollution from power station
emissions — was once dismissed as impossibly expensive, but now runs on
most power stations for little extra cost.
But the boxer configuration isn't the
most emission friendly, and with Subaru already confirming an electric car for 2021 and its next Forester SUV expected to be offered with a hybrid powertrain, the Japanese firm may be forced to turn to hybrid
technology if it's to continue to offer the outright performance expected of its sports saloon.
A fleet of zero -
emissions vehicles,
most likely Nissan Leafs, will serve as the test bed for the
technology, and will allow for a demonstration of remotely controlled transportation, similar to the method in which NASA controls the planetary rovers remotely from a mission control center.
This innovative
technology lowers
emissions and improves performance, making it our
most innovative engine yet.
Designated a PUREDRIVE ™ vehicle, indicating utilization of Nissan's
most advanced
technologies to promote eco-friendly driving and lower CO2
emissions * # # #
PUREDRIVE will be used on models utilizing Nissan's
most advanced
technologies to promote eco-friendly driving and lower CO2
emissions *.
VW is is introducing the
most fuel efficient versions of the Volkswagen Scirocco and Passat CC which have received the BlueMotion
Technology and which also promise a considerable drop in CO2
emissions.
Honda's Environmental Leadership Honda has a long history of environmental innovation, including the retail introduction of America's first hybrid (1999 Honda Insight), delivery of the first fuel - cell electric vehicle in the U.S. (2002 Honda FCX) and the first gasoline - powered vehicles in the hands of consumers to meet stricter
emissions standards, including the 1996 Honda Civic, the first gasoline Low Emissions Vehicle (LEV); the 1998 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicle (ULEV); the 2000 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Super Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicle (SULEV) in the hands of consumers; the 2001 Civic Natural Gas, the first vehicle to qualify as an Advanced Technology Partial - Zero Emissions Vehicle (AT - PZEV); and, most recently, the 2014 Honda Accord Plug - In, the first Super Ultra-Low Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New Yo
emissions standards, including the 1996 Honda Civic, the first gasoline Low
Emissions Vehicle (LEV); the 1998 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicle (ULEV); the 2000 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Super Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicle (SULEV) in the hands of consumers; the 2001 Civic Natural Gas, the first vehicle to qualify as an Advanced Technology Partial - Zero Emissions Vehicle (AT - PZEV); and, most recently, the 2014 Honda Accord Plug - In, the first Super Ultra-Low Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New Yo
Emissions Vehicle (LEV); the 1998 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Ultra-Low
Emissions Vehicle (ULEV); the 2000 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Super Ultra-Low Emissions Vehicle (SULEV) in the hands of consumers; the 2001 Civic Natural Gas, the first vehicle to qualify as an Advanced Technology Partial - Zero Emissions Vehicle (AT - PZEV); and, most recently, the 2014 Honda Accord Plug - In, the first Super Ultra-Low Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New Yo
Emissions Vehicle (ULEV); the 2000 Honda Accord, the first gasoline Super Ultra-Low
Emissions Vehicle (SULEV) in the hands of consumers; the 2001 Civic Natural Gas, the first vehicle to qualify as an Advanced Technology Partial - Zero Emissions Vehicle (AT - PZEV); and, most recently, the 2014 Honda Accord Plug - In, the first Super Ultra-Low Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New Yo
Emissions Vehicle (SULEV) in the hands of consumers; the 2001 Civic Natural Gas, the first vehicle to qualify as an Advanced
Technology Partial - Zero
Emissions Vehicle (AT - PZEV); and, most recently, the 2014 Honda Accord Plug - In, the first Super Ultra-Low Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New Yo
Emissions Vehicle (AT - PZEV); and,
most recently, the 2014 Honda Accord Plug - In, the first Super Ultra-Low
Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New Yo
Emissions 20 Vehicle (LEV 3 / SULEV 20), now available for lease and sale in California and New York state.
It's also clear which
technology Ghosn thinks will be
most effective as a zero
emission product, who told Katayama:
The stop - start
technology that's available on the 130bhp models is of
most benefit in an urban setting and reduces CO2
emissions to just 159g / km.
Furthermore, Toyota is celebrating 10 years of commercial success with hybrid
technology and the world's
most popular low
emissions hybrid car, the Toyota Prius.
Selective catalytic reduction (SCR)
technology cuts NOx
emissions to very low levels and the new XE has been engineered to meet the
most stringent global regulations.
The second diesel model in the range, the BMW 730d, underlines its status as the world's
most economical and lowest
emission model in the luxury class by a further reduction in both fuel consumption and CO2
emissions as well as optionally available BMW BluePerformance
Technology.
Billed as rolling laboratory for the sort of driveline
technology Mercedes expects to include on its luxury cars in the not - too - distant future, the big hydrogen - powered car gets an advanced fuel cell that, in theory, is capable of providing it with the performance to beat even the
most powerful of today's S - class coupe models, the S600, while endowing it with zero -
emission performance.
It is involved in MRI
technologies, mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, x-ray, spark - optical
emission spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and other things
most of us in the investing world have a fringe understanding of at best or heard mentioned by that science nerd we know.
President Bush, in a Rose Garden speech on climate change, challenged the world's biggest (and
most polluting) countries to immediately end trade barriers on energy - related
technology, beef up a fund to help bring less - polluting energy options to poor countries, and commit to curbing their greenhouse - gas
emissions.
Automobiles will by then almost certainly be battery powered, and we have the
technology now to eliminate
most emission from electricity generation and heating.
There are enormous assumptions in
most calculations, including the assumption that «carbon negative»
technologies, like capturing CO2 from power plants burning biomass, can be done at a scale remotely relevant to the climate problem (to be relevant one needs to be talking in gigatons of avoided CO2
emissions per year — each a billion tons).
A single, large coal plant, if built with the best - available
technology, can reduce
emissions by the annual equivalent of taking a million cars off the road compared to the subcritical coal - plant
technology still prevalent in
most countries.
To achieve the Paris ambition,
emissions most likely have to peak in the next decade and there is a growing likelihood that negative
emissions technologies will be necessary.
Many believe the world won't be able to stop drastic climate change without a
technology for curbing
emissions from the cheapest,
most - carbon intensive fuel.
In Issues, a pioneer in geoengineering has laid out the framework for a comprehensive US research plan, saying it should be part of a coherent climate policy agenda that includes vigorous support for climate science, increases efforts to cut
emissions, helps the
most vulnerable populations to adapt, develops negative
emission technologies, and renews a commitment to growing international governance on climate matters.
Donna Spangler, a spokeswoman for the Department of Environmental Quality, stressed that when the state first ordered
emission cuts, it required
technology that was the
most reasonable at the time.
Based on the
most up - to - date, peer - reviewed literature on
emissions modelling, economics, policies and
technologies, today's report reveals how governments, industry and the general public could together reduce the energy and carbon intensity of the global economy despite growing incomes and population levels.
Investors need long run signals to develop new low - cost, lower - emitting
technologies, which will be essential to drive abatement in the developing world, where
emissions are projected to grow the
most.
Most UN climate projections already anticipate that the world will develop and use «negative -
emissions technologies» at some point in the future — that is, some
technology that can scrub carbon from the air.
Cassandra Kubes, from the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), spoke of the potential to save many lives by cleaning the air — not by total transformation of the energy supply, but simply by choosing the latest and
most efficient
technologies to reduce polluted fossil fuel
emissions.
A transparent price on
emissions incentivizes low carbon consumer and business choices, accelerates the commercialization of low - carbon
technologies — and is the
most efficient way to fight climate change.
In all its scenarios, the IEA notes coal's continuous importance, that's why the WCA is urging countries using coal to do so with the cleanest and
most efficient low
emission coal
technologies available.
Despite many improvements, the available
technologies are currently limited, placing the EU's unrealistic
emissions reduction requirements out of reach for even the
most advanced plants.»
Transportation is the largest source of
emissions in the Northeast and traditionally the
most difficult
emissions sector to address, but rapidly evolving
technology offers deep reduction potential.
Although the burning of fossil fuels generates
most of the potential
emissions from
most reserves,
emissions from production and processing operations (known as «upstream
emissions») can also be important, depending on the reserve type and
technologies used.
CCS, which includes
technologies to strip carbon dioxide from the flue gases of power plants, would allow continued output by eliminating
most carbon
emissions.
About 75 % of our electricity is baseload, so baseload (coal) is what is
most important to replace with a low
emissions electricity generating
technology.
A recent report from maritime organisation Lloyds Register and UMAS, setting out the different options for zero
emissions vessels by 2030, similarly showed the
most suitable
technology would be different for different types of ship.
Nuclear power accounts for 63 percent of non-CO2 emitting power sources in the U.S., and is «the
most cost - effective zero -
emission technology,» according to The Economist.
In the wake of the IPCC's 5th Assessment Report, in which
most of the integrated assessment models that hold temperatures to below 2C contemplate large - scale use of such
technologies, and the Paris Agreement's call for balancing
emissions and sinks, these
technologies are increasingly part of the climate response conversation.
President Obama's Climate Action Plan (CAP) directs the EPA to use its authority through its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program to encourage private sector investment in low -
emissions technology by identifying and approving climate - friendly chemicals while prohibiting certain uses of the
most harmful chemical alternatives.
The beauty of the Carbon Tax (or Carbon Tax Shift, as some would rather say) is that in empowers and inspires the mass of people, those who in the aggregate contribute the
most to greenhousing the climate, are the best able to cut
emissions by lifestyle adaptation and ingenuity without resorting to expensive Jetson - style
technology (
most of which needs much development, to be paid for by somebody else of course).
*** The
most astonishing thing about Alan Finkel's report on Australia's electricity market calamity, is that the only stand - alone, CO2
emissions free generation source — nuclear power — barely rates a mention and gets dismissed as if it were some far fetched
technology used by aliens.
The biology of ground just reverts to penalty per nitrogen, yet the
technology of modern farming removes
most of the Nitrogen
emissions as does the reformulation of the fertilizer.
But, Anderson writes,
most assume either an ability to travel back in time (to prevent
emissions that have already happened) or the successful and large - scale adoption of
technologies to remove carbon from the atmosphere that do not yet exist in a scalable form.
Even under the
most effective policy implementation and optimistic
technology and forest sink scenarios, we expect US
emissions to be 23 % below 2005 levels that year — leaving a 220 - 350 million metric ton gap.