Given the population growth and so on, a reasonably good outcome would be to hold
emissions at present levels in the agriculture sector for the next decade or two until we are able to start reducing them.
«The pressure is on us to contain greenhouse gas
emissions at present levels.
Not exact matches
While the agency determined that contamination
levels did not
present a public health risk,
emissions at five test sites violated state regulatory guidelines.
CSIRO scientist Barrie Pittock
presented a paper showing that stabilising the global
level of carbon dioxide
at three times the pre-industrial
level will require reducing
emissions below half the
present level.
The combination of a long beam - path and high - intensity
emission enhances the measurement, so even chemicals
present at parts - per - billion
levels can be detected.
There was a conference held
at the begining of this year that went over this sort of thing, it was subtitled «Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change» and you can find the presentation [slides] that were
presented at http://www.stabilisation2005.com/programme.html There's a lot of interesting things about possible thresholds, stabilisation
levels for CO2 and
emission reduction pathways and the potential costs.
Moreover, Hallinan et al. (2015) showed that since the observed auroral
emissions depended mainly on magnetic dipole moment and rotation (and may have been weakly coupled to other physical characteristics), aurora may be
present at detectable
levels even in the faintest T and Y dwarfs and bodies as well as from exoplanets.
Even if global
emission rates are stabilized
at present — day
levels, just 20 more years of
emissions would give a 25 % probability that warming exceeds 2 °C.
Or what is the climate going to be if
emissions are held
at their
present - day
levels?
579 SecularA said, «
At present, the most aggressive and effective governmental actions to reduce GHG emissions are being taken at the level of national (Germany), state (California) and even municipal government
At present, the most aggressive and effective governmental actions to reduce GHG
emissions are being taken
at the level of national (Germany), state (California) and even municipal government
at the
level of national (Germany), state (California) and even municipal governments.
So climate modelling may not be perfect in the timing, but the end result would still be the same
level of temperatures around 2100, so therefore we don't have any room to think
emissions can continue
at present levels, and the amount of carbon left to burn would not be as high as 800 gigatons.
If Max is correct, and he may well be, with his 50 % take up estimate, it would be reasonable to say,
at present levels of CO2 concentrations, an immediate reduction to 50 % of
present emissions (which I do realise is just not going to happen!)
Our past heat - trapping
emissions have committed us to continued sea
level rise over the coming decades, but our
present and future
emissions choices can affect the rise in seas and the pace
at which it unfolds beyond 2050.
Even when
emissions are stabilized
at 90 % below
present levels at 2050, this 2.0 threshold is eventually broken.
Given that Ireland, with CO2
emissions of 31 % above the 1990
level at present is severely in breach of its commitments under the Kyoto Protocol, there is a growing sentiment that the government could and should be actively encouraging the domestic uptake of these clean renewable energy sources.
The secretariat has set up a portal which
presents information on cooperative initiatives undertaken around the world
at various
levels by governments, international organizations, civil society, and business to reduce
emissions.
Here it is useful to note that an atmospheric concentration
level close to 550 ppm CO2e would result by 2050 if greenhouse gas
emissions simply continued
at present levels without any increases in the intervening years.
All projections show that to meet the 2C target, US
emissions should be
at least 50 - 60 % below 1990
levels by 2025 considering its historical responsibility of causing climate change and its
present capability of solving it.
Now the planet is poised to reach the 1,000 ppm
level in only 100 years if
emissions trajectories remain
at their
present level.»
If greenhouse gas
emissions from fossil fuel combustion continue
at the
present rate, by 2100 the melting may surpass the
levels associated with collapse of the shelves.
At present, carbon dioxide
levels are dramatically higher than normal due to man - made
emissions.
23 Thousands of years ago Temperature change (° c) Carbon dioxide (ppmv) Temperature Change through time Compares to the
present temperature Current
Level Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration and Temperature change Current
Level 2100 CO2 Concentration in the atmosphere (Antarctic Ice Core) If nothing is done to slow greenhouse gas
emissions... CO 2 concentrations will likely be more than 700 ppm by 2100 Global average temperatures projected to rise
at 2.5 - 10.4 degrees If nothing is done to slow greenhouse gas
emissions... CO 2 concentrations will likely be more than 700 ppm by 2100 Global average temperatures projected to rise
at 2.5 - 10.4 degrees
March 29
at 10:00 am EDT In this one - hour webinar, Nate Aden from WRI
presented pathways for reducing industrial subsectors» GHG
emissions to a
level commensurate with limiting average warming in this century to 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial
levels.
If this were so, then there would be no science - based policy debate about the size of the gap between where
emissions are headed
at present and where they need to be in 2020 and 2030
at global, regional, and national
levels.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has submitted its long - term low -
emissions strategy,
presenting a pathway for
emissions reductions of the UK by
at least 80 % by 2050 compared to 1990
levels through a process of legally binding five - year caps on
emissions.
Set to be
presented at the Paris conference, it echoes calls for global temperatures to be held down to a 2C rise on pre-industrial
levels, as well as funds for development in the region, which accounts for just 0.3 % of global greenhouse gas
emissions.
The calculated future SOA burden change, from 0.8 Tg
at present to 2.0 Tg in the future, is driven by changes in
emissions, oxidant
levels and pre-existing particles.
>> The temperature response to which we are already committed
at the
present level of cumulative carbon
emission is 3.9 °C (+ effect of non-CO2 GHG
emissions) not 1.5 °C implied in the SPM