The phrase
"emissions cuts" means reducing the amount of harmful gases and pollutants released into the environment, such as from industries or vehicles. It refers to taking actions to decrease the overall emission levels to combat climate change and lessen the negative impact on our planet.
Full definition
The sort
of emission cuts needed «to do something» would condemn billions of people to grinding poverty.
Another approach would impose shipping
emissions cuts in line with comparable sectors, such as transport and industry.
Without the innovations, I see little long - term
deep emission cuts with current limited technologies (all else equal).
But those nations say rich countries should take the lead
on emissions cuts because they've pumped carbon into the atmosphere for longer.
The team examined a wide range of possibilities for mitigation,
with emissions cuts beginning at different times and continuing at different rates.
To wit: The draft agreement today calls for global greenhouse -
gas emission cuts of between 50 % and 95 % by 2050 compared with 1990 levels.
But the proposal goes nowhere fast, requiring
emission cuts from new aircraft of 4 % over 12 years.
The sense at the meeting was that
drastic emissions cuts are the best way to limit the catastrophic droughts and sea - level rises that global warming is expected to cause.
However, note that existing pledges are insufficient in any case to stabilize CO2 emissions, and that
emission cuts need to be sustained well beyond a single election cycle to be successful.
Many green groups and poorer countries claim that developed countries will use the credits to avoid making big
emissions cuts at home.
After all, any conclusion about the pace of
emissions cuts necessary to limit dangers from climate change is implicitly as much (or more) about economics as science.
My country can not afford to wait six more years for the whole world to take action, and six years of no legally
binding emissions cuts for me is a catastrophe.
Around a quarter of
proposed emissions cuts are conditional on support from the international community, including technology and training as well as finance.
What is notable from the charts above is that it takes quite a long time for the benefits of more
ambitious emissions cuts to be realised.
However, these ideas keep popping up naturally since
significant emission cuts continue to be seen as difficult to achieve, and so should be considered fairly.
But a lack of demand from carbon markets and uncertainty about how many credits could be used as part of future
global emissions cuts has scared off many private sector investors.
But talking about 2020 is crucial to climate scientists, who see quick
emission cuts as important as the concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere in four decades.
However, the European commission is known to already be developing scenarios for
increased emissions cuts through energy savings and a new renewable energy directive.
You can fear global warming and favor adaptation policies rather than
emissions cuts because you think adaptation is more cost - effective and technologically practical.
Furthermore, developed nations needs to take the lead, make
stronger emission cuts than have been so far put forward.
Instead they want more markets for not doing
real emission cuts domestically with their already weak ambition.
You can still take a decision here to see climate change as more than
just emission cuts but also about the rights of women and men.
Finally, the researchers told their program to find the lowest - cost way to achieve certain
emissions cuts while still meeting future power demand.
It needs just
enough emission cuts and a dollop of finance and technology for responding to climate impacts.
Table 2 shows the pie chart values that were communicated to participants for the different
emission cut scenarios in the with - norm condition.
Without
swift emissions cuts, we can expect a serious level of warming — whatever climate sensitivity ends up being.
These are targets designed to
align emissions cuts with climate science, but they are also designed to be feasible to achieve by taking into account what is commercially viable and technically realistic.
That doesn't mean, however, that those states won't be obligated [to make
emission cuts] under the rule — they certainly will be.
Historically, some countries have managed to achieve
annual emissions cuts of 2 - 3 %, but for energy security reasons rather than to tackle climate change.
A corporation will not operate if it does not generate profit, and the process of installing a tax or increasing prices on input materials like carbon
emissions cuts into profits.
As
emission cuts rise toward the ultimate goal of 80 percent, our disposable incomes will take a sizeable hit.
In the current studies, this reference point might coincide with the
maximum emission cut that an individual is willing to pay for.
Phrases with «emissions cuts»