We've no provisional economy or
emissions data yet, though.
Not exact matches
Large transient
emissions remained to be assessed;
yet initial
data suggested that component could increase significantly annual
emissions.
Ed Dlugokencky of NOAA, who confirmed a couple of weeks ago that recent increases in atmospheric methane were continuing, tells me that the
emissions estimates are reasonable, but that the global
data is not
yet consistent with a large and growing source of Arctic methane....»
And IPCC
data suggest that N2O releases are far higher where nitrogen - fertilizer is applied to tropical soil compared to temperate soil —
yet I am not aware of any full assessment of all
emissions, including from soils, for any of the rapidly expanding tropical biofuel crops.
E.P.A. has not
yet had the opportunity to fully review the PNAS study on methane
emissions; however we are encouraged that more methane
emissions measurement
data are now available to the public.
Given the total irrelevance of volcanic aerosols during the period in question, the only very modest effect of fossil fuel
emissions and the many inconsistencies governing the
data pertaining to solar irradiance, it seems clear that climate science has no meaningful explanation for the considerable warming trend we see in the earlier part of the 20th century — and if that's the case, then there is no reason to assume that the warming we see in the latter part of that century could not also be due to either some as
yet unknown natural force, or perhaps simply random drift.
These haven't been included in simulations since the
data on
emissions aren't
yet in.
Yet by focusing entirely on carbon dioxide
emissions, major environmental organizations have failed to account for published
data showing that other gases are the main culprits behind the global warming we see today.