Not exact matches
That said, whereas CO2
emissions from coal - fired power plants in the U.S. have
declined, greenhouse gas
emissions from oil sands have doubled since the turn of the century and look set to double
again by the end of this decade — the primary source of
emissions growth for the entire country of Canada.
Until the 2000s, when
emissions started to rise
again, sulfur dioxide
emissions had generally
declined since the 1970's because of
emission controls spurred by national regulation and international agreements.
The two targets suggest that Russia's
emissions will continue to rise after 2020, peak at some stage, and then
decline until they hit 2020 levels once
again.
In the opposite transition to rapid warming in 1975, once
again I am struck by the fact that while aerosol
emissions ceased to rise, they did not disappear entirely from the atmosphere, but began a gradual
decline from a high peak.
Again, black crosses indicate
emission pathways in which the maximum rate of
emissions decline is less than 4 % yr − 1; grey diamonds indicate the converse.
CO2
emissions in Minnesota
declined by 6.6 percent from 2005 (the peak year for CO2
emissions in both the U.S. and Minnesota) to 2014 (before starting to rise
again).
Global CO2
emissions growth briefly faltered in the early 1980s, in 1992 and
again in 2009, but in each case this was due to a
decline in economic activity.
U.S. carbon
emissions are on the rise
again, after a multi-year
decline.
Needless to say, the use of demographic projections with overestimated fertility
declines again produces underestimated projections of future resource use and
emissions.
Once
again: how does a certain amount of sea level
decline after a period of global cooling (assuming Hay's sources are more accurate than Rahmstorf's) constitute evidence that CO2
emissions are the cause of rising sea levels?