Sentences with phrase «emissions figure still»

It can't match the PHEV on paper, but its claimed fuel consumption of 53.3 mpg is pretty good for an SUV this size, although its 139g / km CO2 emissions figure still means a relatively pricey 29 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.

Not exact matches

Russia has gone them one better: By picking a 1990 baseline, before the collapse of the Soviet Union's economy, they figure they can actually continue to increase their emissions and still claim a long - term reduction.

Figures from the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Food Supply's «Long Term Outlook» now indicate that the country's livestock industry — whose associated greenhouse gas emissions and land use are already a concern for environmentalists — will grow still further in the next ten years.

That it can achieve those figures and still offer the best economy in the petrol line - up - with a 60.1 mpg fuel economy figure and emissions of 109g / km - is pretty extraordinary.

It's a very well - rounded package now, with much more competitive fuel economy and CO2 emissions figures than the earlier model, although it still comes with a few reservations in areas such as engine refinement and the quality of some of its cabin materials.

Still, the extra mass isn't free and the xDrive pays for it in fuel consumption, where it adds 0.7 L / 100 km to the rear - drive car's 7.0 - litre figure, resulting in CO2 emissions of 177g / km compared to the lighter car's 159.

Go for the 17 - inch alloys and that combined fuel economy figure drops to 80.7 mpg and it's 101g / km for emissions of CO2, but the diesel is still the model to go for if low running costs are a big priority.

It helps to reduce the S7's official fuel consumption figure to 29.7 mpg with CO2 emissions of 220g / km, but it's still not cheap to run.

Economy is still decent, with both posting official economy figures of 67.3 mpg and emissions of 109 to 110g / km of CO2 for BiK bands from 23 to 24 %.

Green - European Union (28 countries) Light grey — other 4 European countries (Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Iceland) Black - Candidate countries: Turkey (WLTP applies for imported vehicles; for locally produced vehicles NEDC applies), Israel and outlying EU regions (still unclear): Réunion Island, Martinique, Guadeloupe, French Guiana, St. Martin, Mayotte Dark grey - Partial implementation (planned): South Korea, Japan (WLTP without «extra-high» test cycle phase), India, China (CO2 emissions only, NEDC is used for consumption figures)

But even when you account for that, the IPCC figured that staying below 2 °C would depend on a series of long - shot maneuvers: all nations would need to act right this second, ramp up wind and solar and nuclear power massively, and figure out still - nascent technologies to capture and bury emissions from coal plants.

It's even got a great graph showing how curbing global emissions affects the odds of preventing dangerous levels of global warming (Figure 14 - 3 if you're still following along).

By 2030, the figure will be 56.7 GtCO2e, showing that global emissions — while slowing — would still be on an upward trajectory.

For the period 1900 - 1960, we have less exact figures for CO2 increase and the emissions were a lot smaller, but still nature was a net sink if counted over the whole period.

Backed by 20 countries — and predictably, opposed by countries that still rely heavily on coal (Figure 1)-- the BREF includes new emission limits, expressed as wide, ambiguous ranges, for sulfur dioxides (SOx), nitrogen oxides (NOx), mercury, and particulate matter.

But as the Authority's report shows (in Figure 3 of its report, see below), Australia's per capita emissions and emissions intensity at 2025 would still be much higher than those of the United States and more than twice Europe's, under their respective targets.

These figures are comparable with CH4 plants and have about 20 % less CO2 emissions than the older fleet still going in most countries

Figure 3b shows that a decaying emissions floor does not significantly alter the shape of the relationship between cumulative emissions and peak temperature, as the peak warming is still a function of the cumulative emissions.

Figure 4 - B compares the Bern formulas that, according IPCC, say the part of the anthropic emissions still in the air after t years

Regulators and utilities in states reliant on coal power throughout the nation are already scrambling to figure out how to meet their state's emissions goals while still ensuring reliable electric service.

However, for such an ambitious target as 1.5 C, 0.3 C can make a substantial difference when calculating how much remaining CO2 we can still emit without pushing us over 1.5 C of warming when the remaining budget is calculated by simply subtracting off estimates of cumulative emissions to date from the ESM - based budgets for 1.5 C relative to preindustrial (i.e. the horizontal difference between the cross and the vertical dashed black line in the figure above).

What I mean by this question is that climate change poses a real challenge to social change movements because it is gradual, delayed in its effects, and uneven in its impacts.The message that is coming from climate scientists at present, along with climate - hawkish public figures, is that we still have time to change — that international conferences, evolving public policies, steady but small annual emissions reductions, could still prove sufficient to keep us within the «safe zone».

On the one hand, the many older gasoline cars still on the road — as well as the new gas cars being sold likely have much higher emissions than their official figures — suggest there's a long, long way to go before 85 grams becomes the norm across all cars in Norway.

But what these figures do not take into account is that if this happens the administration will still be required to begin the process of reducing carbon emissions under the auspices of the Clean Air Act, thus increasing the likelihood that we will reach the high - end scenario.