Sentences with phrase «emissions figures mean»

Disappointing economy and emissions figures mean the Soul will be pricier to run than it could be

The 1.3 - litre diesel returns up to 72.4 mpg, and its 104g / km CO2 emissions figure means a reasonable 22 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) company - car tax rating.

Not exact matches

It can't match the PHEV on paper, but its claimed fuel consumption of 53.3 mpg is pretty good for an SUV this size, although its 139g / km CO2 emissions figure still means a relatively pricey 29 % Benefit - in - Kind (BiK) rating for company - car drivers.

Drivers are rarely able to achieve quoted official fuel economy figures, and the increased amount of fuel used also means official emissions statistics are innacurate too.

However, a change to emissions testing meant CO2 figures increased slightly from 1 February 2018, pushing the Prius above the threshold for free entry into the London Congestion Charge Zone.

While this figure will obviously depend on how you drive the P400e, its 64g / km CO2 emissions figure is fixed, and means it's by far the cheapest Range Rover Sport for company - car drivers.

The Euro IV compliant unit also offers impressively low carbon dioxide emissions, with a CO2 figure of just 149g / km for the five - door hatch and 158g / km for the Wagon, meaning the newcomer will appeal as much to fleets as it will to cost - conscious private buyers.

Figures 1 and 2 of the post are referenced to the year 2000; however, since 2000 the world has been on an anthropogenic emissions path leading to at least a 5oC mean global temperature rise by 2100.

According to Greenpeace analysis of the figures, this means that China's CO2 emissions declined by 1 - 2 % in 2015.

The most statistics can tell us at present is that there does appear to be a genuine warming trend in figure A. Whether this trend is the effect of greenhouse gas emissions or of a natural fluctuation due to some as - yet - undiscovered mechanism can not be determined from an analysis of the global mean temperature alone.

Figure 4: Projected global mean surface temperature changes from 1990 to 2100 for the full set of IS92 emission scenarios.

If we were certain that the ensemble mean warming represents the real climate systemt we could read out from figure 1c at which cumulative carbon emission we could expect to cross this threshold.

Carbon and Other Biochemical Cycles: On cumulative fossil fuel emissions for the 2012 - 2100 period, China, Kenya and Venezuela, opposed by Germany, said presenting figures for the means together with the ranges created confusion.

Of the factors examined, CH4 emissions were best predicted by chlorophyll a concentrations (positive correlation, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.50, n = 31); CO2 emissions were best predicted by reported mean annual precipitation (positive correlation, p = 0.04, R2 = 0.11, n = 33); and N2O emissions were most strongly related to reservoir NO3 — concentrations (positive correlation, p < 0.001, R2 = 0.49, n = 18, table 3, supplemental figure S6).

However, it is much easier to figure out what happens when you add more radiative gases to an atmosphere that already has them: And, the answer is that it increases the IR opacity of the atmosphere, which increases the altitude of the effective radiating level and hence means the emission is occurring from a lower - temperature layer, leading to a reduction of emission that is eventually remedied by the atmosphere heating up so that radiative balance at the top - of - the - atmosphere is restored.

These figures illustrate the way the probability distribution of future global mean temperature change under a high - emissions scenario is linked to different potential changes in temperature and precipitation at a county - level.

For example, the 183 figure which is highlighted in gold means Mass's 17.1 % electric power as a source of its overall CO2 emissions is 1.83 times higher than Maine's 9.4 % electric power as a source of CO2.

Figure 3: Global mean temperature measurements (black) and projections based on an IPCC scenario with high emissions (A2) for a climate sensitivity parameter of 5 °C (upper red) and 2 °C (upper blue).

Shown are the simulated, multi-model mean responses to (i) the A2 emissions scenario and (ii) an extended B1 scenario, where radiative forcing beyond the year 2100 was kept constant to the 2100 value (all data from Meehl et al., 2007, Figure 10.4, see also Meehl et al., 2007, Section 10.7).

The mean emissions of the N American members of the global 10 % are 32 tonnes of carbon per person per year, for the 1 %, the figure is 86 tonnes.

In any case, again, figure 3 shows that if we stop all emissions now (and yes, Jim, that means completely stop emitting any more CO2, not just stabilize the rate we are emitting at now, unless I'm missing something), with a climate sensitivity of 3 degrees C we will see atmospheric CO2 levels remain at current high levels for centuries.

What I mean by this question is that climate change poses a real challenge to social change movements because it is gradual, delayed in its effects, and uneven in its impacts.The message that is coming from climate scientists at present, along with climate - hawkish public figures, is that we still have time to change — that international conferences, evolving public policies, steady but small annual emissions reductions, could still prove sufficient to keep us within the «safe zone».

This figure came in 240 % higher than in 2006, resulting partially from a mean rise in the price of carbon emissions from $ 4.10 per tonne to $ 6.10 per tonne.

Pre-TAR AOGCM results held at the DDC were included in a model intercomparison across the four SRES emissions scenarios (B1, B2, A2, and A1FI) of seasonal mean temperature and precipitation change for thirty - two world regions (Ruosteenoja et al., 2003).9 The inter-model range of changes by the end of the 21st century is summarised in Figure 2.6 for the A2 scenario, expressed as rates of change per century.