Sentences with phrase «emissions figures shows»

A glance at the consumption and emissions figures shows that the AMG V12 is fit for the future: with fuel consumption of 23.7 mpg (equivalent to 279 g / km CO2), the S 65 AMG Coupé is significantly more economical than all of its rivals.

The fuel consumption and CO2 emissions figures shown were determined according to the European Regulation (EC) 715/2007 in the version applicable at the time of type approval.

Not exact matches

The government has insisted it is on track to meet and exceed its Kyoto target, as new figures show greenhouse gas emissions fell between 2004 and 2005.

Business and environmental groups have called for changes to the EU emissions trading scheme after new figures show some countries are failing to use it to cut pollution.

The government has attempted to downplay provisional figures showing carbon dioxide emissions rose by 1.25 per cent last year and instead argued the rise should motivate government, business and individuals to take action on reducing emissions.

The EPA partly arrived at the lower figure by excluding the cost of U.S. emissions on other countries, yet as the study shows, effects in developing countries have clear spillovers on developed countries.

EU car emissions fell 2.6 percent in 2012 from 2011, official figures showed on Wednesday, adding to a fierce Brussels debate on how quickly automakers can improve vehicle fuel efficiency.

BRUSSELS (Reuters)- EU car emissions fell 2.6 percent in 2012 from 2011, official figures showed on Wednesday, adding to a fierce Brussels debate on how quickly automakers can improve vehicle fuel efficiency.

Below is one of the figures from the draft summary that sparked debate; it shows that emissions from lower - middle income countries (LMCs) and upper - middle income countries (UMCs) are rising faster than emissions from high - income countries (HICs).

Those who argue that reducing emissions will be too expensive ignore the costs of climate change - economic studies have consistently shown that mitigation is several times less costly than trying to adapt to climate change (Figure 7).

Average daily minimum and maximum temperatures increase in the mid-century and end - of - century projections for both stabilization and business - as - usual emission scenarios (Figure 2 - 10 shows output for annual average daily maximum temperature).

The record year for renewables, coupled with a second year of declines for coal, saw global CO2 emissions remain flat for the third year in a row, the BP figures show, increasing by just 0.1 %.

The motorists» association says results show emissions of noxious gases up to four times the regulatory limits, while greenhouse - gas emissions and fuel consumption was up to 35 % higher than figures shown on the government - mandated Fuel Consumption Label.

The new Cayenne gains LEVII emission status and preliminary fuel economy testing showed estimated EPA fuel economy figures of 18 mpg in the city and 22 on the highway.

The new Cayenne gains LEV2 emission status and preliminary fuel economy testing showed estimated EPA fuel economy figures of 18 mpg in the city and 22 on the highway.

Showcased at the exhibition stand of the tradition - steeped British brand, it will be a joint premiere for the new MINI Hardtop (combined fuel consumption: 6.0 — 4.8 l / 100 km; combined CO2 emissions: 138 — 109 g / km) and the MINI Convertible (combined fuel consumption: 6.3 — 5.2 l / 100 km; combined CO2 emissions: 144 — 118 g / km; EU test cycle figures, dependent on tyre format selected) at a major international motor show.

This model - based range is shown as the grey band (labelled «Several models all SRES envelope» in the original Figure 5 of the TAR SPM) and ranged from 21 to 70 cm, while the central estimate for each emission scenario is shown as a coloured dashed line.

The TAR showed sea level rise curves for a range of emission scenarios (shown in the Figure above together with the new observational record of Church and White 2006).

The results showed that ASEAN countries have relatively high allowable emissions in terms of Sulphur Oxides (SOx), Nitrogen Oxides (NOx), and Particulate Matter (PM)(see figures 1).

The figure shown here summarizes how each of these strategies helps reduce emissions to reach the target.

Figure 1 shows the carbon dioxide emissions pathways of the original RCPs along with our determination within each of the contribution from U.S. electricity production.

All told, Figure 3 shows the developed countries — with only a fifth of the world's population — consuming nearly half of the remaining, quickly vanishing global emissions budget.

The figures also show the current «best guess» of the man - made warming to the year 2100, assuming no action is taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Figure 1 shows (the red line) the EU's mitigation obligations (its share of an emergency emissions reduction pathway that is stringent enough to support a high probability of holding the 2ºC line), relative to the EU's reference pathway.

Figure B shows the response of the same simple model to the lowest of the emissions scenarios considered in 1992 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

Figure 1 shows recent emissions (the 1990 — 2009 gray area), our representative 350 emissions pathway (the 2010 — 2050 red area) and, for comparison, a business - as - usual pathway (the dotted black line) that's consistent with the International Energy Agency's standard «reference case» (no new climate policy) projections.

Figure A shows the temperature change under such a «business - as - usual» emissions scenario in a simple climate model.

Figure 2 shows Australia's emissions between 1990 and 2001.22 Over the 11 year period emissions from energy have increased by 83 million tonnes of CO2 - e.

It's even got a great graph showing how curbing global emissions affects the odds of preventing dangerous levels of global warming (Figure 14 - 3 if you're still following along).

The IPCC model projections of future warming based on the varios SRES and human emissions only (both GHG warming and aerosol cooling, but no natural influences) are shown in Figure 6.

As this figure shows, even without accounting for the actual GHG emissions since 1990, the warming projections are consistent with the observations, within the margin of uncertainty.

He shows, how the emission originates over a wide range of altitudes with a significant contribution from altitudes 8 - 15 km, where the amount of water is small and CO2 is the main source of emission and where the temperature is falling with altitude (Figure 2).

Figure 2: RCP on - line database showing RPC6 spatial data for industry CO2e emissions for the year 2020.

By 2030, the figure will be 56.7 GtCO2e, showing that global emissions — while slowing — would still be on an upward trajectory.

The total emissions for each year between 2014 and 2017 and the countries that were responsible for the change in emissions are shown in the figure below.

Again, this loss does not show up in the FAO's figures, and the resulting emissions are considered to be natural, not man - made.

The figure below shows global CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, divided into emissions from China (red shading), India (yellow), the US (bright blue), EU (dark blue) and the remainder of the world (grey).

Figure 2: Data show that CO2 removed from the atmosphere by plant growth does not compensate for fossil fuel emissions.

The figure below shows how the rate of reduction varies based on peak year, adding in the new estimated 2017 emissions.

But the study says Drax's own data shows that while burning coal leads to emissions of 1,901 lb of carbon dioxide per megawatt hour (Mwh), the figure for wood is significantly higher — 2,128 lb per Mwh.

To illustrate this, Figure 5 - 21 shows gridded sulfur emissions in 1990 and 2050 in the A1B marker (see Box 5 - 5)

Figure 5 - 16: Regional and global CO2 emissions in the four SRES markers scenarios A1B, A2, B1, and B2, shown as an index (1990 = 100).

If you are fully familiar with the figures, which show natural emissions are roughly 30 times larger than human emissions, then I suggest you consider the honesty of your statement.

On the contrary, Figure 1 is a conservative estimate of potential emissions from tar sands because: the economically extractable amount grows with technology development and oil price; the total tar sands resource is larger than the known resource, possibly much larger; extraction of tar sands oil uses conventional oil and gas, which will show up as additions to the purple bars in Figure 1; development of tar sands will destroy overlying forest and prairie ecology, emitting biospheric CO2 to the atmosphere.

Those who argue that reducing emissions will be too expensive ignore the costs of climate change - economic studies have consistently shown that mitigation is several times less costly than trying to adapt to climate change (Figure 7).

Posted by Olive Heffernan on behalf of Paty Romero Lankao It does make sense to compare the per capita CO2 emissions of Mexico City and Los Angeles (see figure below) to illuminate the debate on shared but differentiated responsibilities on greenhouse gases emissions and show that just as urban centers register different levels and paths of economic development, cities do not contribute at the same level to global warming.

That was backed up by figures from the Federal Environment Agency, which showed carbon dioxide emissions from transport rose by 5.4 m tonnes, or 3.4 per cent in 2016 — partly due to an increase in freight traffic, which expanded by 2.8 per cent.

These trends are illustrated in the figure below, which shows essentially flat energy use and emissions in the reference case but declining energy use and emissions in the energy efficiency case.

It does make sense to compare the per capita CO2 emissions of Mexico City and Los Angeles (see figure below) to illuminate the debate on shared but differentiated responsibilities on greenhouse gases emissions and show that just as urban centers register different levels and paths of economic development, cities do not contribute at the same level to global warming.

Figures released today by the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) show that greenhouse gas emissions in the UK fell by 2.4 percent in 2013.