• New coal - fired
power plants would only be permitted when they replace existing coal - fired capacity (so they would not increase the total capacity) unless they were
completely clean, i.e., unless they had a way of removing carbon dioxide
from emissions.
The challengers next claim is that EPA is
completely barred
from limiting
power plants» dangerous carbon pollution because EPA has already used another part of the law — Section 112 — to curb the same
plants»
emissions of mercury and other hazardous air pollutants.
Lastly, what would have represented the most recent, comprehensive regulatory scheme for addressing carbon dioxide
emissions from US
power plants and thus a key component of US energy policy, the Clean Power Plan developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of the Clean Air Act, was mired down by legal challenges under the Obama Administration and has been completely abandoned by the Trump Administra
power plants and thus a key component of US energy policy, the Clean
Power Plan developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of the Clean Air Act, was mired down by legal challenges under the Obama Administration and has been completely abandoned by the Trump Administra
Power Plan developed by the US Environmental Protection Agency under the authority of the Clean Air Act, was mired down by legal challenges under the Obama Administration and has been
completely abandoned by the Trump Administration.