Emissions from coal exported by Australia are almost twice as much as our entire emissions within Australia.more...
Do all the algebra, and you arrive at 199 million tons of CO2 per year in «direct»
emissions from the coal exports.
To calculate the carbon - dioxide
emissions from coal exports, I assumed that 110 million tons of Powder River Basin coal are exported each year.
Not exact matches
Factor in the «carbon light» CO2
from coal seam gas projects in the East (and other LNG expansion in the north and west) and you're talking about Australia's fossil fuel
emission exports equating to TWO Saudi Arabias by 2020, not one as I've been saying to many disbelieving ears.
The «climate pragmatists,» such as Victor, Stern, and myself, argue that the point of Australian climate policy is not to solve the global climate problem, or to solve the problem of
emissions from international trade, but rather to achieve politically feasible forward progress on domestic climate policy that can help set the foundation for future global policy (which as you and Victor have pointed out is the only way to deal with leakage, including
coal exports).
The
emissions from our
exports of
coal, gas and oil are counted in the country where they burned.
The
emissions from this
exported coal are currently equal to the total
emissions we produce here at home, and if government and industry get their way, these
emissions will double again.
However, the National Energy Technical Laboratory's (or NETL) just released «Life Cycle GHG Perspective on Exporting LNG
from the U.S.» found that there are 50 percent more
emissions from the natural gas
export supply chain compared to
coal's supply chain, offsetting the gains due to lower pollution
from combustion.
Government says
emissions from BC's
coal exports are someone else's problem.
After accounting for all the methane leakage factors mentioned by the Post, the NETL study clearly demonstrates that life cycle GHG
emissions from LNG
exports from the U.S. are significantly less than
emissions from coal generated electricity in China and in Europe.
Liberals have proudly discussed the possibility of a carbon tax on imports
from countries that have not adopted
emission reductions strategies, but they have yet to publicly propose an
export ban or tariff on
coal.
Halting crude oil
exports would reduce drilling and fracking and could prevent up to 500 million tons of greenhouse
emissions — the pollution equivalent of more than 135
coal - fired power plants, according to a report
from the Center for American Progress.
The
emissions from the 721 million tons of
coal in the South Porcupine is equivalent to the annual
emissions of over 234 million passenger cars — that's nearly all the cars in the U.S.. Another way of measuring this
coal — especially important for those in the Pacific Northwest resisting the industry's efforts to ship it through their communities for
export to Asia — is that 721 million tons of
coal is enough to fill 6.5 million train cars.