To help policymakers and other decision makers develop effective strategies for managing and reducing GHG emissions through a better understanding of
the emissions impacts of policies and actions
Not exact matches
Exxon has argued against all the other shareholder proposals as well, including a «
policy to explicitly prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity»; a
policy articulating Exxon's «respect for and commitment to the human right to water»; «a report discussing possible long term risks to the company's finances and operations posed by the environmental, social and economic challenges associated with the oil sands»; a report
of «known and potential environmental
impacts» and «
policy options» to address the
impacts of the company's «fracturing operations»; a report
of recommendations on how Exxon can become an «environmentally sustainable energy company»; and adoption
of «quantitative goals... for reducing total greenhouse gas
emissions.»
Impact on oil and gas production: compared to a carbon tax, Alberta's
policy offers emitters less
of an incentive to reduce production in order to cut GHGs, notes Leach: «assuming that the facility reduced production by 10 percent, and that
emissions decreased proportionately (a simplifying assumption), the facility's
emissions intensity would not change, so its carbon liability per barrel
of oil produced would also remain constant.»
«Meat — The Big Omission from the Talks on
Emissions» Humane Society, Brighter Green, Chatham House 9 Dec 15:00 — 16:30 Observer Room 04 COP21 Paris — Le Bourget Site Leading experts and government officials will discuss the climate
impacts of meat and dairy consumption, public awareness, and potential
policy and behaviour - change solutions.
Those nine areas are focused on agriculture (carbon farming), increasing energy efficiency, reducing food waste, eliminating commodity - driven deforestation, reducing the climate
impact of packaging, advocating for responsible
policies, committing to 100 percent renewable power, reducing short - lived climate pollutant
emissions and transportation - related
emissions.
«Speed reductions, which are known to reduce
emissions, would need to be maintained over a very long - term period in order to produce regional air quality benefits,» said James Corbett, a professor
of marine
policy at the University
of Delaware, who has studied the
impact of the shipping industry on human health.
Even without formal
policy and programs, the importance
of reducing
emissions can be widely accepted by individuals and organizations and result in actions that have substantial
impact.»
«Efforts to mitigate
emissions take a variety
of forms at the state and local level and may have substantial
impact even in the absence
of a unified national
policy,» the paper notes.
«Identifying this causal effect is not only necessary for proposing regulatory
policies on plant
emissions, but also essential for inferring the long - term health
impacts of such
policies,» says Yang.
«The methodology can not be used to infer anything about the direct
impacts of specific
policies, such as power plant
emissions limits or renewable portfolio standards, or the effect that changes in relative prices may have on fuel choice, such as the
impact of the change in supply or price
of natural gas or renewables may have had on the competitiveness
of coal.
This article aims to show that behavioral multi-agent models are a suitable approach for assessing the
impact of policy instruments to reduce CO2
emissions in road transport by introducing a multi agent model for the German road transport sector.
In line with the Honda's
policy of reducing
impact on the environment the engine is E10 - compliant and has Euro IV
emission levels.
The possibility
of quick and seemingly inexpensive geoengineering fixes could distract the public and
policy makers from critically needed efforts to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions and build society's capacity to deal with unavoidable climate
impacts.
By midcentury, this would add up to nearly a quarter - billion more Chinese than currently projected by the U.N. And given China's
impact on the environment, especially greenhouse gas
emissions, this change
of policy clearly portends a great deal.
As I wrote above, James Carville's campaign mantra about «the economy, stupid,» is vital to keep in mind here as well, so I'll closed with the voices
of three economists who've extensively analyzed the economic
impacts of accumulating greenhouse gases and various
policies for curbing
emissions.
In particular, future greenhouse gas
emissions depend on societal choices,
policies, and technology advancements not yet made, and climate - change
impacts depend on both the amount
of climate change that occurs and the effectiveness
of development in reducing exposure and vulnerability.
Economic assessments
of proposed
policy to put a price on carbon
emissions are in widespread agreement that the net economic
impact will be minor.
As for the
impact on
policy, Lewandowsky said, «We show that the adverse effects
of uncertainty are «leveraged» and hence amplified by more
emissions.
April 8: «1.5 亿多辆 : 控制中国汽车对环境影响的挑战 (150 Million and Counting: Challenges
of Controlling the Environmental
Impacts of China's Motor Vehicles)» by David Vance Wagner, International
Policy Adviser, Vehicle
Emissions Control Center, Ministry
of Environmental Protection, People's Republic
of China.
Policy attention to air quality is rising and global
emissions of all the major pollutants fall in our projections, but their health
impacts remain severe.
The latest relevant ABARE publication («Economic
impact of climate change
policy», ABARE Research Report 06 - 7) says that global CO2
emissions in its reference case closely follow those under the IPCC's A2 scenario to 2030 and that the latter scenario assumes a decline in economic growth after that year (pps.
When reviewing the environmental
impacts of fossil fuel projects under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA), the judges said, the agency can't assume the harmful effects away by claiming that dirty fuels left untouched in one location would automatically bubble up, greenhouse gas
emissions and all, somewhere else.
The
impact of policies which involve trade - offs between one GHG and another (such as replacing coal with natural gas, which would reduce CO2 but might increase methane
emissions) is especially uncertain, since current models
of both gases» life - cycles (and thus their relative GWPs) may need to be revised in the future.
You may believe that it has nothing to do with the study
of the
impact of additional CO2 on the environment, but for many other scientists who are studying the issue and advocating that
policies be implemented to reduce CO2
emissions; it is certainly true.
C - ROADS C - ROADS is an award - winning computer simulation that helps people understand the long - term climate
impacts of policy scenarios to reduce greenhouse gas
emissions.
Monitor trends in energy use and CO2
emissions: follow the evolution
of 50 global energy efficiency indicators to better understand
policies»
impact.
Elsewhere, the US says it «do [es] not have updated information» about the
impact of recent
policy announcements on
emissions.
It is being pointed out to you that the department's planning and programming
policy commits the department to leadership in substantial
emissions reductions to «reduce greenhouse gas
emissions in support
of U.S. climate change initiatives» and «to foster efforts to assess, adapt to, and mitigate the
impacts of climate change».
The RGGI states use the production cost model Integrated Planning Model (IPM) to analyze the
impacts of air quality
policies including
emissions and allowance costs.
«Getting serious about climate change requires wrangling about the cost
of emissions goals, sharing the burdens and drawing up international funding mechanisms,» they add, so it makes sense to shift from a simple but esoteric measure
of global - temperature change to a range
of indicators to which larger numbers
of people are likelier to relate — indicators the authors argue are thus likelier to spur
policies that have a real climate - curbing
impact.
There are a number
of transport
emissions reduction
policy measures that Congress could pursue, but the one that will have the most immediate
impact is the one that will demand more from those modes
of transportation that are currently the most fuel and carbon efficient — like passenger rail.
10:30 a.m. Panel II: Scenarios and implications: the
impact of potential outcomes David Hunter, US Director, International
Emissions Trading Association (moderator) Rob Brenner, Senior Fellow, Nicholas Institute, Duke University; Former EPA Director
of the Office
of Policy Analysis and Review at the Office
of Air and Radiation (invited) William Brownell, Partner, Hunton and Williams Megan Ceronsky, Attorney, Environmental Defense Fund Kyle Danish, Member, Van Ness Feldman
I am trying to make the point that estimating the global economic
impact of global warming GHG
emissions and mitigation
policies is extremely important.
I am trying to make the point that estimating the global economic
impact of global warming GHG
emissions and mitigation
policies is critically important for justifying public expenditure on
policies.
In order to provide a contribution, the study uses the
IMPACT model to examine agriculture - GHG
emissions links and the effects
of policy and other changes on these links.
The model, which captures fuel use in the power, transport, and other energy sectors out to 2030, with fuel responsiveness parameterized to empirical literature, estimates the
impacts of mitigation
policies on CO2
emissions, revenue, premature deaths from local air pollution, household and industry groups.
We advise public
policy makers at all levels with respect to the design
of suitable instruments for
emissions trading, incentives and funding mechanisms as well as the evaluation
of their
impacts.
While other measures are also essential — including technological solutions, personal lifestyle changes and
policies to reduce fossil fuel use and develop alternative energy — the positive
impact of each
of those is reduced and may even be completely cancelled out by adding
emissions from hundreds
of millions
of new people as our population increases.
Using the NRDC
policy framework, along with the proprietary outlook from IHS Inc. on energy efficiency and power demand, the Energy Institute report then assesses the costs and market
impacts of meeting the Obama Administration's
emissions target
of 42 % reductions below 2005 levels by 2030.
Amongst climate scientists and advocates
of climate
policy, a growing recognition is taking hold that the current trajectory
of global
emissions will almost certainly lead us to a world
of dangerous climate change
impacts.
The World Bank and the OECD could review the
emission reduction
policies and their costs, while national institutions could assess the
impacts of climate change.
In practical terms, the law requires the government to transition from non-renewable to renewable energy; to develop new economic indicators that will assess the ecological
impact of all economic activity; to carry out ecological audits
of all private and state companies; to regulate and reduce greenhouse gas
emissions; to develop
policies of food and renewable energy sovereignty; to research and invest resources in energy efficiency, ecological practices, and organic agriculture; and to require all companies and individuals to be accountable for environmental contamination with a duty to restore damaged environments.
Its powerful combination
of strong international leadership, progressive thinking and forward - looking
policies are reflected in its calls for dramatic cuts in global greenhouse gas
emissions and for mechanisms to help vulnerable countries adapt to the
impacts of climate change.
To many economists and
policy - makers, a market - based means
of limiting carbon dioxide
emissions makes sense, given that they are produced in every sector
of the global economy, with
impacts felt over the entire planet.
As an example
of a «Free Market»
policy that could make a significant
impact on cutting global GHG
emissions and providing many other valuable benefits as well, assume the USA decides to remove the impediments to low - cost nuclear power.
The
policy problem is a chain
of numbers, each
of which can be assigned a clear, unambiguous, unmetaphysical estimated probability distribution: the
emissions trajectory, the carbon cycle feedbacks, the climate response, the ocean chemistry response, the ice sheet response, the
impacts, these are all quantitative.
Later on in the opinion piece, Lomborg states that climate «alarmism has encouraged the pursuit
of a one - sided climate
policy of trying to cut carbon
emissions by subsidizing wind farms and solar panels,» referring to renewable energy
policies and technology as «expensive, feel - good measures that will have an imperceptible climate
impact.»
«(3) an analysis
of the status
of worldwide greenhouse gas reduction efforts, including implementation
of the Safe Climate Act and other
policies, both domestic and international, for reducing greenhouse gas
emissions, preventing dangerous atmospheric concentrations
of greenhouse gases, preventing significant irreversible consequences
of climate change, and reducing vulnerability to the
impacts of climate change.
But when you look at the big
impact on
emissions so far, they are mostly out
of luck and accident as opposed to
policy.
The
emissions impact would be comparable to that
of other major climate
policies under consideration by the Obama administration.