For example, they write, a 30 percent reduction in deforestation rates as seen in the Brazilian Amazon between 2005 and 2010 only cut carbon
emissions over the same time period by 10 percent.
This is an order of magnitude smaller than the likely warming induced by anthropogenic
emissions over the same time period.
Not exact matches
The researchers also used data from global climate monitoring stations to calculate CO2
emissions from tropical lands
over the
same time period.
I suspect that there might be a measurable connection with similar Tundra regions across Russia and NE Europe as well as a reasonable direct connection with whatever the CO2 Flux is from these very
same regions — being just as important an
emission as CH4 from Permafrost
over time.
At the
same time, the political turmoil
over high energy prices has created a new hurdle facing those — including both presidential candidates — who say they want to blunt the unabated climb in
emissions of greenhouse gases with a cap or tax.
The poverty level in China has dropped immensely since the late 1970s, but if you look at the distribution of improvement
over time versus their carbon
emissions over the
same period there's little correlation.
Over the
same period, American power - station
emissions cut theirs by nearly ten
times that amount — 170.1 million tons.
At the
same time, Parliament has approved stringent new measures to reduce carbon
emissions by 2020, with the biggest CO2 cuts by far to come from an increase of more than 800 percent in offshore wind power
over the next seven years.
He could nod to opening up new land for drilling with less red tape, while at the
same time proposing an elusive carbon tax that reduces aggregate U.S.
emissions over time.
To ask India to take on the
same obligations as developed countries with more than 30
times higher per capita income and
over ten
times higher per capita
emissions is simply unfair.
Both of the major political parties have committed to
emissions targets: the Liberals have a target of a 26 - 28 % reduction relative to 2005 levels by 2030, whereas Labor has pledged a 45 % cut
over the
same time frame.
Each RCP contains the
same categories of data, but the values vary a great deal, reflecting different
emission trajectories
over time as determined by the underlying socio - economic assumptions (which are unique to each RCP).
Equivalent carbon dioxide (CO2)
emission - The amount of carbon dioxide
emission that would cause the
same integrated radiative forcing,
over a given
time horizon, as an emitted amount of a well mixed heat - trapping gas (greenhouse gas) or a mixture of well mixed greenhouse gases.
-- How do you explain that warming rate along [1910 — 1840] period is exactly the
same (+0,45 °C
over 30 years) as the one observed
over [1970 — 2000] period, whereas [CO2] was about 30 % lower and human
emissions 5
time lower?
The company also commits to reduce supply chain GHG
emissions ** by 29 %
over the
same time - period.
At the
same time, if
emissions reductions are too modest
over the coming two decades, it may no longer be possible to reach a goal of 450 ppm CO2eq by the end of the century without large ‐ scale deployment of carbon dioxide removal technologies.
The company also commits to reduce absolute scope 3
emissions 25 %
over the
same time period.
This commitment is driven by a target to reduce
emissions intensity per employee 30 %
over the
same time - period.
This commitment is driven by a target to reduce
emissions intensity per employee by 40 %
over the
same time period.
That means that the ~ 0.6 warming since the LIA is good for not more than ~ 5 ppmv CO2 increase
over the past 55 years, while human
emissions were ~ 170 ppmv and the increase in the atmosphere was ~ 80 ppmv in the
same time frame...
Consider the following two charts, which tell a complex tale in a simple manner that, while not ideal, does serve to highlight the main point — U.S.
emissions, cumulated
over time, are greater than China's, but at the
same time the U.S. is pledging to smaller cuts.
But a direct comparison is made possible by table 13.6 of the report, which allows a comparison of old and new projections for the
same emissions scenario (the moderate A1B scenario)
over the
time interval 1990 - 2100 (*).
Accordingly,
over the next few decades the focus of climate policy should be to: (a) broadly advance sustainable development (particularly in developing countries since that would generally enhance their adaptive capacity to cope with numerous problems that currently beset them, including climate - sensitive problems), (b) reduce vulnerabilities to climate - sensitive problems that are urgent today and might be exacerbated by future climate change, and (c) implement «no - regret»
emission reduction measures while at the
same time striving to expand the universe of such measures through research and development of cleaner and more affordable technologies.
(G&A are also inconsistent on a number of fronts, including applying the 20 - year GWP for methane to livestock but using the 100 - year GWP for other anthropogenic methane
emissions, and making an adjustment to
emissions figures for the year 2000 to account for increases in livestock tonnage between 2002 and 2009, but not making similar adjustments for rising fossil fuel consumption
over the
same time).
The 20 % is the increase in additional CO2 levels
over a period of in average 8 years, caused by
emissions increasing by 22 %
over the
same time span...