For example, they write, a 30 percent reduction in deforestation rates as seen in the Brazilian Amazon between 2005 and 2010 only cut carbon
emissions over the same time period by 10 percent.
This is an order of magnitude smaller than the likely warming induced by anthropogenic
emissions over the same time period.
Not exact matches
The researchers also used data from global climate monitoring stations to calculate CO2
emissions from tropical lands
over the
same time period.
The poverty level in China has dropped immensely since the late 1970s, but if you look at the distribution of improvement
over time versus their carbon
emissions over the
same period there's little correlation.
Over the
same period, American power - station
emissions cut theirs by nearly ten
times that amount — 170.1 million tons.
-- How do you explain that warming rate along [1910 — 1840]
period is exactly the
same (+0,45 °C
over 30 years) as the one observed
over [1970 — 2000]
period, whereas [CO2] was about 30 % lower and human
emissions 5
time lower?
The company also commits to reduce supply chain GHG
emissions ** by 29 %
over the
same time -
period.
The company also commits to reduce absolute scope 3
emissions 25 %
over the
same time period.
This commitment is driven by a target to reduce
emissions intensity per employee 30 %
over the
same time -
period.
This commitment is driven by a target to reduce
emissions intensity per employee by 40 %
over the
same time period.
The 20 % is the increase in additional CO2 levels
over a
period of in average 8 years, caused by
emissions increasing by 22 %
over the
same time span...