Sentences with phrase «emissions scenario»

Under a more moderate emissions scenario, the county can expect nearly 20 weeks of cold temperatures each year, on average, by late century.
Tables S3 — S6 list the individual large cities committed at different thresholds under each emissions scenario and ice sheet case, by year.
He confuses the proposition that «an emissions scenario (input) is reasonable» with «the predictions of temperature in this scenario (output) are reasonable».
Soil moisture 12 inches below ground projected through 2100 for a high greenhouse gas emissions scenario.
Model projections for precipitation changes are less certain than those for temperature.12, 2 Under a higher emissions scenario (A2), global climate models (GCMs) project average winter and spring precipitation by late this century (2071 - 2099) to increase 10 % to 20 % relative to 1971 - 2000, while changes in summer and fall are not expected to be larger than natural variations.
Commitments within each case begin to diverge after 2030 depending upon the emissions scenario and diverge strongly after midcentury.
In the zero emissions scenario (Fig. 2B), the observed spatial distribution of H2SO4 is quite different.
Cities exceeding 100,000 residents where 50 or 100 % of the 2010 population - weighted area will fall below the future committed high tide line, assuming inevitable collapse of the WAIS under any emissions scenario (triggered case)
Figure 7: IPCC TAR model projection for emissions Scenario A2 (blue) vs. observed surface temperature changes (average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4; red) for 1990 through 2012.
We used the multi-model mean warming associated with the RCP 8.5 emissions scenario (out to 2050) as a representation of the quickest rate of forced warming that could conceivably be occurring currently.
Question: Does your study rule - out the rate of warming associated with the IPCC's RCP 8.5 emissions scenario?
Across most of the continental United States, those days will be about 10ºF to 15ºF hotter in the future under the higher emissions scenario.
In the zero SO2 / H2SO4 emissions scenario, although both MSA and SO2 are derived from the oxidation of OSCs, their distribution in the SoCAB is different (Figs. 2C and 3B).
For example, stormwater across the city of Milwaukee recently showed high human fecal pathogen levels at all 45 outflow locations, indicating widespread sewage contamination.87 One study estimated that increased storm events will lead to an increase of up to 120 % in combined sewer overflows into Lake Michigan by 2100 under a very high emissions scenario (A1FI), 57 leading to additional human health issues and beach closures.
The mean high temperature projections for 2050 and 2100 were derived from a suite of 28 climate models (CMIP5 / Oak Ridge National Laboratory) under IPCC emissions scenario RCP8.5, averaged over November 22 - 28 for 2030 - 2049 and 2080 - 2099, respectively.»
Figure 5 compares the IPCC SAR global surface warming projection for the most accurate emissions scenario (IS92a) to the observed surface warming from 1990 to 2012.
2: Our Changing Climate, Key Message 5).2 Regional climate models (RCMs) using the same emissions scenario also project increased spring precipitation (9 % in 2041 - 2062 relative to 1979 - 2000) and decreased summer precipitation (by an average of about 8 % in 2041 - 2062 relative to 1979 - 2000) particularly in the southern portions of the Midwest.12 Increases in the frequency and intensity of extreme precipitation are projected across the entire region in both GCM and RCM simulations (Figure 18.6), and these increases are generally larger than the projected changes in average precipitation.12, 2
(D, F, H, J) Higher emissions scenario (A1FI).
The projections for the end of the century (2081 - 2100) are approximately 5.6 °F for the lower emissions scenario and 8.5 °F for the higher emissions scenario (see Ch.
Figure 9: IPCC AR4 multi-model projection for emissions Scenario A2 (blue) vs. observed surface temperature changes (average of NASA GISS, NOAA NCDC, and HadCRUT4; red) for 2000 through 2012.
In the zero anthropogenic SO2 emissions scenario, those were turned off.
Depending on the emissions scenario (B1, A2, A1FI) our semi-empirical estimates (central estimates published 2009) range between ca. 1.0 and 1.4 meters for the period 1990 - 2100.
For the study, the researchers used a set of 10 global climate models to simulate future changes in wind power under a high future emissions scenario (known as RCP8.5) and a moderate emissions scenario (known as RCP4.5).
Figure A shows the temperature change under such a «business - as - usual» emissions scenario in a simple climate model.
Figure 6: Easterbrook's two global temperature projections A (green) and B (blue) vs. the IPCC TAR simple model projection tuned to seven global climate models for emissions scenario A2 (the closest scenario to reality thus far)(red) and observed global surface temperature change (the average of NASA GISS, NOAA, and HadCRUT4)(black) over the period 2000 through 2011.
However, this rise in wind potential is only projected for a high emissions scenario (RCP8.5).
Even under a minimum - emissions scenario, models indicate a warming of 1.5 C above present - day temperatures by the year 2100.
The key difference from figure A is that much lower population and economic growth rates are assumed in this lower emissions scenario.
«In the southern hemisphere, the increase in wind power depends on the land - sea thermal gradient, and apparently the stronger emissions scenario (RCP8.5) is needed to make the difference in temperature and thus pressure between land and sea strong enough to amplify the winds.»
Aircraft emissions used a time changing pattern from the QUANTIFY B2i emissions scenario (Lee et al. 2010), as the overall pathway for this scenario closely matched the GCAM model output.
The global mean temperature difference is shown for the time period 1900 to 2100 for the IPCC A2 emissions scenario (relative to zero for the average temperature during the years 1961 to 1990).
This team, led by Jose Marengo of the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE), assesses the local impacts of the global SRES A1B emissions scenario, an old IPCC scenario for (A1) a world with rapid economic growth, decreasing population after 2050 and rapid implementation of efficient technologies with (B) a «balanced mix of energy sources».
«Under a moderate emissions scenario, applications for asylum would increase by 28 percent by the end of the century,» Newsweek reports.
(SRES is Special Report on Emissions Scenario)
If skeptics are right and we follow the high emissions scenario, we'll break that limit 3 decades later than we would otherwise suspect.
«Under a high emissions scenario, where we don't make significant changes to our fossil fuel use, applications could increase by 188 percent — nearly tripling.»
The draft's authors suggest that under the worst - case emissions scenario the modelers considered, global sea levels could rise by up to 1 meter by the end of the century, about two centimeters higher than the top of the range offered in 2007.
Using a recently developed hurricane synthesizer driven by large - scale meteorological variables derived from global climate models, 1000 artificial 100 - yr time series of Atlantic hurricanes that make landfall along the U.S. Gulf and East Coasts are generated for four climate models and for current climate conditions as well as for the warmer climate of 100 yr hence under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emissions scenario A1b.
In other words, shells of these marine organisms may simply dissolve as soon as atmospheric CO2 reaches the levels that are expected to occur in about 50 years under the IS92a business - as - usual CO2 emissions scenario.
While the direct emissions saved from Arctic shipping may be significant in the context of shipping emissions overall, the net emissions scenario of an open Arctic are unlikely to offset the warming Arctic, not by a long shot.
The post-2000 growth rate exceeds the most fossil - fuel - dependent A1F1 emissions scenario developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in the late 1990s.
There may be more to consider under such a high emissions scenario.
Climate models show that by the end of this century, under a business - as - usual emissions scenario where there is no constraint in the amount of greenhouse gas emissions pumped into the atmosphere that ratio could climb to 50:1.
Global emissions of heat - trapping gases are now increasing even more rapidly than the highest emissions scenario scientists have been analyzing.
There is no estimate, even probabilistically, as to the likelihood of any emissions scenario and no best guess.»
His latest attempts at model / obs comparisons, reflected in the Fox article, do not flag which emissions scenario he is using at all, but I assume it is still RCP8.5.
The IPCC Summary For Policymakers shows the graph below for a business - as - usual carbon emissions scenario, comparing temperatures in the 1980s with temperatures in the 2020s (orange) and 2090s (red).
For RCP8.5 [the high emissions scenario and warming track in the illustration above] by 2100, the combination of high temperature and humidity in some areas for parts of the year will compromise normal activities, including growing food or working outdoors (high confidence).
page 30: «Current carbon dioxide emissions are, in fact, above the highest emissions scenario developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), implying that if we stay the current course, we're heading for even larger warming than the highest projections from the IPCC.»
I think it is important to stress that with the current growth of fossil fuel emissions we are above the highest IPCC emissions scenario (RCP 8.5), at least for fossil fuel combustion.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z