As shown in this chart, renewable energies tend to have much lower
emissions than other sources, such as natural gas or coal.
Not exact matches
The Fuel Quality Directive has attracted a great deal of attention here in Canada because it would assign a higher
emissions rating to Alberta oilsands
than to
other sources of crude oil, and I have -LSB-...]
Next week, the EU is expected to vote on the Fuel Quality Directive which would assign a higher
emissions rating to Alberta oilsands
than to
other sources of crude oil, including some which may or may not actually have higher
emissions than oilsands oil.
If similar results are found in
other urban areas, then unknown urban
sources could account for 7 to 15 per cent of humans» global
emissions of the gas, the researchers calculate — far more
than was thought (Geophysical Research Letters, DOI: 10.1029 / 2009gl039825).
Hydrogen is a very good carrier for renewable energy because it is abundant, generates zero
emissions, and is much easier to store
than other energy
sources, like solar or wind energy.
Algae production consumes more energy, has higher greenhouse gas
emissions and uses more water
than other biofuel
sources, like corn, switch grass and canola, Clarens and his colleagues found by using a statistical model to compare growth data of algae with conventional crops.
Biofuels use more land area, generate more greenhouse gas
emissions, and have a greater impact on the environment
than other alternative energy
sources such as photovoltaic solar energy, solar thermal energy, or wind power.
A host of new techniques and technologies will be required to reduce
emissions from these
sources that includes reusing heat and power generated in manufacturing processes; recycling materials or substituting them; controlling greenhouse gases
other than carbon dioxide (CO2); and, ultimately, capturing and burying the CO2 produced.
Her favorite chemicals — favorite in the sense that she has studied them more
than any
others — are the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in cigarette smoke, power - plant
emissions, automobile exhaust, and
other sources of combustion.
In Boston, methane
emissions from aging pipes and
other sources may be more
than double official state estimates for the city, according to a study published Thursday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, which was led by a team of researchers and scientists at Harvard University.
I doubt that politicians truely understand the problem at hand, it is not as if we have a new energy technology ready to fill in for fossil fusl at the present time and whilst I am sure
than energy efficiency can reduce carbon
emissions by around 25 % it will be left to the markets to decide this and that means awaiting the onset of peak fossil fuels to push up the price of it that will make
other energy
sources more viable.
The oil sands are still a tiny part of the world's carbon problem — they account for less
than a tenth of one percent of global CO2
emissions — but to many environmentalists they are the thin end of the wedge, the first step along a path that could lead to
other, even dirtier
sources of oil: producing it from oil shale or coal.
AB: The planet absorbs CO2 based on concentration, not
emissions (
other than near point
sources).
This shift away from CO2 - centric
emissions debates is also evident in a group blog post by analysts at the Center for American Progress, who propose a «multiple multilateralism» approach on climate that, among
other things, seeks quick steps on
sources of warming
other than carbon dioxide — particularly sooty Arctic pollution and gases already considered under the existing ozone - protection treaty.
While the greenhouse gas footprint of the production of
other foods, compared to
sources such as livestock, is highly dependent on a number of factors, production of livestock currently accounts for about 30 % of the U.S. total
emissions of methane.316, 320,325,326 This amount of methane can be reduced somewhat by recovery methods such as the use of biogas digesters, but future changes in dietary practices, including those motivated by considerations
other than climate change mitigation, could also have an effect on the amount of methane emitted to the atmosphere.327
Regarding all the
other sources of CO2, it is very true that anthropogenic
emission are very much smaller
than natural
emissions, but natural
emissions are well balanced by natural sinks.
As the last major economy to submit a target for a global climate pact, India is pledging to reduce the intensity of its carbon
emissions and boost the share of electricity produced from
sources other than fossil fuels to...
Economic analyses have shown conclusively that reducing
emissions from deforestation is considerably less expensive
than reducing
emissions from fossil fuel combustion and
other industrial
sources.
Methane
emissions are the
source of the greenhouse gas which, after carbon dioxide, probably causes climatologists more sleepless nights
than any of the
other gases.
For the period 1850 - 1900, the
emissions were a lot smaller
than the natural variability, thus nature has been a sink in some years and a
source in
other years.
Half of man's
emissions no more remain in the atmosphere
than do half the
emissions from all the
other sources, which are 33 times as great.
Aircraft not only emit 12 percent of CO2
emissions from U.S. transportation
sources — they also emit nitrogen oxides
other than nitrous oxide, causing warming when emitted at high elevation.
Studies have generally found either higher
emissions than expected from EPA inventory methods, or mixed results (some
sources higher and
others lower).
In
other words, while low - or zero - carbon
sources would make up a greater portion of India's energy supply, overall carbon
emissions would nearly double: from around 2.1 billion tons in 2014 to more
than four billion tons by 2040, according to the International Energy Agency.
Climate skeptic scientists have long questioned whether the effects of relatively minor (compared to
other CO2
sources and sinks) human - caused
emissions of CO2 have more
than a minor effect on global temperatures and some have even questioned whether the UN and USEPA have even gotten the causation backwards (i.e., because on balance global temperatures affect atmospheric CO2 levels).
For the avoidance of doubt, Gross Revenues shall (A) exclude monies received from any
source other than the sale of electric energy and capacity, including, without limitation, any of the following: (i) any federal, state, county or local tax benefits, grants or credits or allowances related to, derived from, or granted to the Wind Energy Project or Grantee, including, but not limited to, investment or production tax credits, or property or sales tax exemptions, (ii) proceeds from financing activities, sales, assignments, partial assignments, contracts (
other than the power purchase agreement) or
other dispositions of or related to the Wind Energy Project (such as damages for breach of contract or liquidated damages for delays in project completion or failures in equipment performance), (iii) amounts received as reimbursements or compensation for wheeling costs or
other electricity transmission or delivery costs, and (iv) any proceeds received by Grantee as a result of damage or casualty to the Wind Energy Project, or any portion thereof and (B) include any revenues derived from Grantee's sale of carbon dioxide trading credits, renewable energy credits or certificates,
emissions reduction credits,
emissions allowances, green tags, tradable renewable credits, or Green - e ® products, any of which are allocated to Grantee, if applicable, through its participation in any voluntary registry, association or market - based exchange.
Some options hold the potential for net
emission reductions that exceed 100 percent — meaning that more carbon would be sequestered during the production process
than would be emitted as carbon dioxide during its life cycle — if fertilizer inputs are minimized and biomass or
other renewable
sources are used for process energy (see Worldwatch Institute, 2007).
Hence,
emissions embedded in trade grew faster
than emissions of
other source.
If there was a national price for carbon
emissions, then
other sources of greenhouse gasses would also diminish more quickly
than shown.
Emissions from transportation may grow faster
than any
other sources through 2050, the report warns, rising up to 71 percent over 2010 levels.
E.g., research assumes greenhouse gas
emissions cause warming without explicitly stating humans are the cause»... carbon sequestration in soil is important for mitigating global climate change» (4a) No position Does not address or mention the cause of global warming (4b) Uncertain Expresses position that human's role on recent global warming is uncertain / undefined «While the extent of human - induced global warming is inconclusive...» (5) Implicit rejection Implies humans have had a minimal impact on global warming without saying so explicitly E.g., proposing a natural mechanism is the main cause of global warming»... anywhere from a major portion to all of the warming of the 20th century could plausibly result from natural causes according to these results» (6) Explicit rejection without quantification Explicitly minimizes or rejects that humans are causing global warming»... the global temperature record provides little support for the catastrophic view of the greenhouse effect» (7) Explicit rejection with quantification Explicitly states that humans are causing less
than half of global warming «The human contribution to the CO2 content in the atmosphere and the increase in temperature is negligible in comparison with
other sources of carbon dioxide
emission»»
When
emission reductions occur at sites or
sources owned by the project developer, there is also less risk that an entity
other than the project developer will claim ownership of the reductions.
LONDON, 31 March, 2018 — Methane
emissions are the
source of the greenhouse gas which, after carbon dioxide, probably causes climatologists more sleepless nights
than any of the
other gases.
The report indicates that livestock products are also responsible for more greenhouse gases
emissions than most
other food
sources, which are caused by feed production, enteric fermentation, animal waste and land - use change.
Just the act of mining it out of the ground causes a fair amount of destruction (and costs the lives of many miners, especially in poorer countries), and burning it produces more CO2
than any
other source of energy, as well as mercury that makes its way up the food chain and smog - forming
emissions of all kinds... But that's not all!
Other surprises include the recognition that reducing methane emissions from whatever source has important indirect impacts on a range of other drivers and is a more effective strategy for short - term reductions in global warming than had been previously recogn
Other surprises include the recognition that reducing methane
emissions from whatever
source has important indirect impacts on a range of
other drivers and is a more effective strategy for short - term reductions in global warming than had been previously recogn
other drivers and is a more effective strategy for short - term reductions in global warming
than had been previously recognized.
But obviously this is not the case as you can clearly see based on the fact that greenhouse
emissions from
other sources are many orders of magnitudes higher
than from PV, even if you take old data and produce PV in large number on old inefficient equipment and do ignore the simple fact that PV electricity production replaces fossil fuel based electricity production!
Fuelwood is not a suitable energy
source in all locations, such as densely - populated urban areas, because its air
emissions tend to be higher
than other options, and the air is already burdened with pollution from industry and transportation.
Comprehensive policies directed at reducing greenhouse gas
emissions from
sources other than energy, for example waste, industrial
emissions, fugitives, land - use change, deforestation and agriculture.
Jobs were up 20 %,
emissions down, more wind megawatts were installed
than any
other fuel
source, and happy landowners pocketed a cool $ 222 million for their trouble.
Pursuing shale gas only makes possible sense, from a climate perspective, if you accept the urgency of reducing
emissions, in which case if it genuinely is lower emitting
than other fossil fuel
sources then it could be used to replace those
sources in the short and medium terms.
These and
other mercury
emissions from human activities (past and present) account for at least 50 % and perhaps as much as 75 % of current, annual, global mercury
emissions from all
sources (including natural
sources), but a large, unknown portion of those mercury
emissions is due to past rather
than current human activities, according to EPA estimates.
With the stroke of a pen the technocrats quietly absolved government of all responsibility to reduce
emissions from some of the most obvious and most tractable
sources of pollution in the land: the fossil - fuel devouring power stations and factories whose smokestacks belch millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere each year — not to mention huge amounts of
other pollutants which damage our health more directly
than CO2.