Regardless of who is elected later this year we won't see
emissions trading until 2010 at the earliest.
Not exact matches
Lead author Dr Zhifu Mi,
until recently at UEA's School of International Development, now at University College London, said: «The patterns of
emissions embodied in China's domestic and foreign
trade have changed since the economic recession but the interregional carbon
emission flows in China and internationally in the post-financial crisis era have not been analysed thoroughly.
Theoretically, a global
trading scheme will cut
emissions far more, but since it won't start
until 2020, it will have a lot of catching up to do.
More importantly, the Climate Security Act of 2007 (Lieberman / Warner bill) is currently in mark - up and exempts co-ops from the cap - and -
trade decreasing carbon allocations by setting their
emissions at 2006 levels
until 2035 and then allowing them to sell or
trade their
emission credits.
His critics show few signs of ever accommodating the ideas he now presses, which include a prompt moratorium on new coal - burning power plants
until they can capture and store carbon dioxide and a rising tax on fuels contributing greenhouse - gas
emissions, with the revenue passed back directly to citizens, avoiding the complexities of «cap and
trade» bills.
My point is this: In my view, the Times should find out, and convey to the public (in one place and in organized fashion), the views of each and every Congressperson, and person running for Congress, regarding a moratorium on coal - fired power plants (
until their carbon dioxide
emissions can be eliminated), a carbon «cap - and - auction» or «cap - and -
trade» system, or carbon tax, and related matters having to do with global warming.
Establishing industrial energy efficiency program funding at 0.25 % of
emissions allowances
until 2030; and the establishment of a Revolving Loan Fund with 1/3 of the Energy - Intensive,
Trade - Exposed Industries (EITE) allocations.
The South Australian independent senator Nick Xenophon has said he won't vote for the carbon tax repeal
until the Coalition agrees to change Direct Action to incorporate the intensity - based
emissions trading scheme proposed by Frontier Economics.
It projects trends in energy supply and demand, prices,
trade and carbon
emissions from now
until the year 2030.
For example, nine states in the Northeast, as part of a regional cap - and -
trade program that sets overall limits on carbon and then allows states to
trade permits to pollute, have committed to cut
emissions by 45 percent during the next year and by another 2.5 percent a year after that
until 2020.
The decision breaks the deadlock over the Government's 11 bills introducing an
emissions trading scheme (ETS), which were defeated in Parliament last Thursday and are not due to be reintroduced
until November.
In any case, what you appear to be prposing is that we cap and
trade co2, and that
until we do, we can not know what benefits un-capped co2
emissions have.
Malcolm Turnbull could've stayed leader in 2009 — all he had to do was agree to delay the
emissions trading scheme
until the rest of the world acted.
3 April 2014, Brussels — Today, the European Parliament's plenary voted to extend the exclusion of intercontinental flights from paying for carbon
emissions as part of the EU Emissions Trading Scheme un
emissions as part of the EU
Emissions Trading Scheme un
Emissions Trading Scheme
until 2016.
Given that, if one wants freedom of choice and an efficient market, shouldn't one accept a market solution (tax / credit or analogous system based on public costs, applied strategically to minimize paperwork (don't tax residential utility bills — apply upstream instead), applied approximately fairly to both be fair and encourage an efficient market response (don't ignore any significant category, put all sources of the same
emission on equal footing; if cap /
trade, allow some exchange between CO2 and CH4, etc, based CO2 (eq); include ocean acidification, etc.), allowing some approximation to that standard so as to not get very high costs in dealing with small details and also to address the biggest, most - well understood effects and sources first (put off dealing with the costs and benifits of sulphate aerosols, etc,
until later if necessary — but get at high - latitude black carbon right away)?
The
emissions -
trading orthodoxy had no competition in the mainstream debate
until very recently, when a broad coalition of prominent Australians and organisations signed an open letter to the Prime Minister.