«The efficiency of converting coal into electricity matters: more efficient power plants use less fuel and
emit less climate - damaging carbon dioxide,» wrote the authors of the International Energy Agency report on measuring coal plant performance.
Not exact matches
The only real
climate change solutions that I have seen are to reduce carbon dioxide in the air by having human activity
emit less of it.
Current
climate change models indicate temperatures will increase as long as humans continue to
emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but the projections of future precipitation are far
less certain.
The analysis clearly shows that the research is biased towards countries that are wealthier, better educated, more stable and
less corrupt,
emit the most carbon, and are
less vulnerable to
climate change.
For example, burning compressed natural gas
emits roughly 30 percent
less CO2 than burning diesel but, if the new methane leakage estimates are true, the practice ends up being worse for
climate change.
Because switching from coal to cleaner and more affordable energy would result in
less coal mined,
less coal burned, and
less carbon pollution
emitted, BLM's decisions do have a
climate impact — and a big one at that.
A new 1,000 - page Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change report appears to ignore both nuclear power and shale gas — even though both these energy sources
emit far
less CO2 than does coal.
The 2009 State of the
Climate report gives these top indicators: humans
emitted 30 billion tons of of CO2 into the atmosphere each year from the burning of fossil fuels (oil, coal, and natural gas),
less oxygen in the air from the burning of fossil fuels, rising fossil fuel carbon in corals, nights warming faster than days, satellites show
less of the earth's heat escaping into space, cooling of the stratosphere or upper atmosphere, warming of the troposphere or lower atmosphere, etc..
To solve this problem, Stiglitz (along with many other top
climate experts) points out that a global price commitment would exert an identical pressure to reduce emission without requiring poor countries to
emit less than rich countries.
A new initiative of the Inter-American Development Bank, the government of Honduras, and the
Climate Investment Fund is helping to replace open - fire cookstoves in Honduras with «ecostoves,» which use
less wood and
emit less smoke.
We hardly noticed A somewhat recent, but hardly noticed paper (open link) has appeared in Energy and Environment 18 (5) 2007
emitted by William Nierneberg's accomplice in killing off early, and
less expensive action on
climate change, Gary Yohe, Eli's old friend Richard Tol who thought Nicholas Stern should be stood up against the wall and striped of his economic stripes,
And in fact when you look at the scientific literature, it's an interesting disconnect because the modelers who study emissions and how to control those emissions are generally much more comfortable setting goals in terms of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas concentrations because that comes more or
less directly out of their models and is much more proximate or more closely connected to what humans actually do to screw up the
climate in the first place, which is
emit these greenhouse gases.
All we need to do to avoid the possibility of triggering disastrous
climate change is
emit less CO2.
Finally, as gray bodies GHGs
emit less than do true black bodies, so for reasonable accuracy any
climate - sensitivity calculation based on their emission must be reduced accordingly.
That's right, the latest
climate science (some 10 studies published in just the past 3 years) indicates that the earth's
climate sensitivity — that is, how much the global average surface temperature will rise as a result of greenhouse gases
emitted from human activities — is some 33 percent
less than scientists thought at the time of the last IPCC Assessment, published in 2007.
Although corn ethanol as modeled here
emits marginally
less GHGs than does gasoline, the combined
climate and air quality impacts are greater than those from gasoline vehicles.
Yet, since the world averages 6.5 CO2 tons of per capita emissions while countries like the United States are
emitting 19 tons per capita, and the world must reduce per capita emissions to perhaps
less than 2.0 tons per capita to prevent dangerous
climate change, it is very unlikely that many groups or people in developed countries can make a respectable argument that they are already below their fair share of safe global emissions.
They found that open oceans are much
less efficient than sea ice when it comes to
emitting in the far - infrared region of the spectrum, a previously unknown phenomenon that is likely contributing to the warming of the polar
climate.
To meet U.S. and international
climate goals we need to
emit less greenhouse gas into the atmosphere and, eventually,
emit none.
In the
climate world, the more carbon you
emit, the
less chance you have of achieving a certain temperature limit.
Climate science estimates that to have a 66 % chance of warming
less than 2 °C, we must
emit less than 1000 more gigatons of CO2 after 2011.
The fact that
climate change is likely to deal its harshest blows to
less developed nations is one of the cruel ironies about this issue — considering that it was largely the rich, industrialized world that
emitted the greenhouse gases that caused the problem in the first place.
But overall, especially with
climate, since nearly all of the growth in emissions is going to come in poor countries, if you can't come up with energy choices that are
less greenhouse gas
emitting and also are cheap, they are just going to keep burning fossil fuels.
While in the former area
climate campaigners are Big Oil's enemy, in the latter area they are its ally, as gas
emits less CO2 than its main rival (coal) for a given amount of energy.