Sprawling metro regions consume more energy and
emit more waste, some of which contributes to climate change.
Not exact matches
The sentence marked with an asterisk was changed from «In fact, fly ash — a by - product from burning coal for power — and other coal
waste contains up to 100 times
more radiation than nuclear
waste» to «In fact, the fly ash
emitted by a power plant — a by - product from burning coal for electricity — carries into the surrounding environment 100 times
more radiation than a nuclear power plant producing the same amount of energy.»
As cars become
more fuel - efficient, less heat is
wasted in the exhaust, which makes it harder to clean up the pollutants that are
emitted.
Lawn equipment like mowers and weedeaters (or weedwackers, depending on where you're from),
emit much
more waste into the air than cars and trucks.
Since anthropogenic
emitted CO2 comes out of a power plant stacks / vehicle exhausts at an elevated temperature (due to the trivial manmade
waste heat energy), and then cools down to near equilibrium with the rest of the atmosphere, why would this new CO2 then absorb
more energy and heatup again?
«In reality, the oil sands are
more environmentally progressive and
emit less
waste than all sorts of other common industries in Canada and around the world.
Although groups and individuals have respectable ethical arguments to make that they are complying with their ethical duties if they are meeting nationally imposed obligations, ethical arguments remain that they should do
more if: (a) the national target does not move as quickly as possible to reduce the nation's emissions to its fair share of safe global emissions, or (b) the group or individual could do
more to reduce GHG emissions without imposing great hardship on themselves because they are
wasting GHG
emitting energy on unnecessary activities.
And that packaging represents
wasted resources such as petrochemicals, trees, chemicals, water as well as transport emissions — the heavier the product, the
more greenhouse gas emissions
emitted.
New York University, for example, may rank as a big emitter in New York, but a year ago it opened a co-generation facility that makes electricity and uses the
waste heat to heat and cool buildings, thus doing far
more work per pound of carbon dioxide
emitted than most other sources.
For those of us on a
more human time frame, the methane and other gases
emitted from decomposing organic matter work just as well as the stuff you have to frack out of the ground... and, as you can see in the infographic below, create all sorts of opportunities to deal with
wastes more efficiently, and to even create a few jobs.