In the case of gases the emissivity limits the radiation to some wavelengths while solid and matter
emits IR at all wavelengths within limits set by the temperature.
According to one theory, the black absorbs light so it rotates away from the light, or is it that the black
emits IR?
The warmed earth
emits IR, which is a loss of energy, and so results in COOLING.
Without regard to the R.W.Wood's experiment, if you simply ask warmists to prove experimentally that CO2 indeed warms the surface (not just
emits some IR), they fail immediately.
3) Posts that deny explicitely or implicitely that CO2
emits IR at frequencies corresponding to vibrationally excited states.
-- robust radiative physics — ground - based instrumental evidence that CO2 absorbs and therefore
emits IR exactly in accordance with the physical theory — satellite data confirming this — satellite data apparently indicating a radiative imbalance at TOA — robust measurements of the fraction of atmospheric CO2 — increasing global OHC since the mid-C20th
Water vapour is a semi-greenhouse gas as it «traps» latent energy, but
emits IR to space.
Sandwiched inside is a two - part material: nano - PE that is coated on one side with IR - absorbing (and emitting) black carbon, and on the other side an ultrathin layer of copper that only weakly absorbs and
emits IR.
Even if ultimately there is real confidence in ocean heat content data — i.e. the trends exceed the differences in data handling — without understanding changes in reflected SW and
emitted IR it remains impossible to understand the global energy dynamic.
The increase in
emitted IR was 0.7 and 0.5 W / m2.
But to begin, note the physical chemistry of tri-atomic atmopspheric molecules; pass optical bands and absorb /
emit IR.
If one could see the IR light, an opaque atmosphere would make the pattern of
emitted IR diffuse since only the IR from the upper levels of the atmosphere escape to space after it has been absorbed and re-emitted by the greenhouse gases (this of course depends on the wavelength of the IR and the absorption spectrum, but we can use this assumption for heat loss integrated over the whole IR spectrum).
All molecules
emit IR, including those that do not absorb it.
Both can and will
emit IR radiation when in in excited state, going down in temperature in the process.
under intense IR radiation CO2 will effective «fill up» and become saturated, unable to absorb any more until it has
emitted some IR photons?
Even assuming that the visible reflectivity of the paint is 100 %, and the infrared emissivity is also 100 %, and ignoring that GHGs would trap some of
the emitted IR, the maximum influence would be on the order of 0.14 % (7e11 / 5e14; I hope I did the math and counted the decimal places right) decrease in radiative forcing.
They can not absorb or
emit ir radiation through vibrational modes.
Miskolczi's optical thickness is how much of the surface
emitted IR radiation reaches the top untouched and is equivalent to 15 %.
If you are designing an atmospheric model with molecules that absorb or
emit ir energy, N2 and O2 would not be modeled as absorbing or emitting ir energy through vibrational interactions with electromagnetic radiation.
Even the surface of Mercury with sun heated surface of 725 K isn't hot enough to
emit IR light which this camera could see.
The important thing about CO2 and H2O molecules is that they can
emit IR according to their temperature.
HIRS shows an increase in
emitted IR of 0.2 W / m2 between the 1980's and 1990's.
To be a GHG it must not
emit any IR like nitrogen.Which is why nitrogen is put into double glazing units not CO2.
The ambient atmospheric properties are important since if there is a lot of other stuff absorbing and
emitting IR, then doubling CO2 will have less of an effect (i.e. doubling CO2 is most strongly felt at the surface in the Arctic, and at the top of the atmosphere in the tropics).
But N2 and O2 are mostly IR inert, they neither absorb nor
emit IR (based upon the electrial nature of the molecule... symetrical).
Does CO2 also cool those same N2 / O2 gases by
emitting IR at night, when there is no incoming IR from the Earth's surface?
At the same instant others will
emit IR and decrease their vibrationnal energy.
The cavity will
emit IR according to a black body law.
Also nitrogen N - N colliding with another molecule will be deformed and acquire a transient dipolar momentum which will allow it to absorb and
emit IR.
When CO2 is present high in the atmosphere, it helps
emit IR, so causing cooling of the atmosphere acting as a vector by which other gases can lose heat into space.
Also if the earth is at say 300 K and is
emitting IR at 10 mirco and CO2 absorbs at 200 K at 15 micro just how much of the earths IR emissions can be absorbed?
While O = C =O has no permanent dipolar momentum, it has vibrational modes where an asymmetry appears and it is those modes that will absorb and
emit IR.
This looks like heating to me, and, the temperature is controlled by the variance in the rate of absorbed and
emitted IR photons for any small volume.
But more directly in response to your point, in caveat 2 Tom clearly states: ******************************************************************** You will sometimes read or hear that «the CO2 has not the time to
emit IR because the relaxation time is much longer than the mean time between collisions.»
Not heresy, as nobody would argue that «greenhouse» gases don't absorb and
emit IR and radiate to space.
Can radiative gases
emit IR to the surface (land only) and slow it's cooling rate?
N2 and O2 are generally called non radiative gases in climate science, but they do absorb and
emit IR.
Al is a very poor IR radiator (emissivity less than 0.1 typically), so whether the Al surface is hot or cold, most of the IR from it could well be REFLECTED IR from the water below, not
EMITTED IR from the water block itself.
office and other modellers won't acknowledge the real cause of the UHI is that to do so, they would have to admit that the Earth does not
emit IR as if it were an isolated black body in a vacuum, so the GHE is the reduction of its emissivity.
Jim D October 20, 2014 at 8:46 pm «dalyp, you are confusing net IR with
emitted IR.
At the same time N2 and O2 release energy to other H2O and CO2 molecules that
emit IR.
Do you still think that colder objects do not
emit IR radiation?
The «notch» is caused by molecules absorbing and subsequently
emitting IR photons in all directions.
Some of those gases absorb and
emit IR radiation.
Trees
emit IR, enough to melt snow and reduce snowpack.
Make a measurement of
emitted IR from that container.
It can not store heat it HAS to
emit IR, that is a physical property of CO2.
Is it a gas that absorbs and
emit IR within certain bands of the EM spectrum?
For reference here the skin layer is the layer capable of
emitting IR.
If the water surface temperature increases, then the likely response is that
emitted IR will increase, thermal losses to the atmosphere will increase, and thermal transfer into the ocean will increase as well.