«Luckily, the opposite is also true: if
we emit less greenhouse gas and the temperature drops, we gain a bonus in the form of less methane production.
We should continue to support the very best parts of it: the ones that encourage the production of more advanced and more sustainable biofuels, for instance, or the requirement that a renewable fuel must
emit less greenhouse gas than the petroleum - based fuel it would replace.
that
we emit less greenhouse gas, let next generation more happy and left resouce for our next generation.
In addition, the popularity of natural gas relies, in part, on its reputation as a «bridge fuel» — the fossil fuel that will lead to a renewable energy future because it's cleaner burning,
emits less greenhouse gas and uses water less intensively in certain steps of the process.
To qualify as «advanced,» EPA has to certify that the fuel
emits less greenhouse gas emissions than conventional gasoline.
Plug - in hybrids typically
emit less greenhouse gas than conventional vehicles.
To meet U.S. and international climate goals we need to
emit less greenhouse gas into the atmosphere and, eventually, emit none.
Modern cookstoves
emit less greenhouse gases and also reduce fuel use by 30 - 60 % and black carbon emissions by 50 - 90 %.
Not exact matches
(Hanna Tuomisto, who in 2011 conducted a study at Oxford University's Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, found that growing meats in - vitro would use 35 % to 60 %
less energy,
emit 80 % to 95 %
less greenhouse gas and use around 98 %
less land than conventionally produced animal meat.)
New Democrats have repeatedly pointed out that it is ludicrous to force the public sector, which is responsible for
less than one per cent of
greenhouse gases emitted in the province, to subsidize big polluters who pay no penalty for the majority of their
greenhouse gas emissions.
According to the company, making the plant - based burger uses 99 percent
less land, 85 percent
less water, and
emits 89 percent
less greenhouse gas than traditional beef production.
Hilary Benn has pointed out that modern incinerators actually
emit less toxic
gas than a barbeque, and could help to reduce waste and therefore
greenhouse gases.
So, what happens when ships
emit less sulphur and warming from
greenhouse gases is no longer offset?
Pound for pound, insect farming
emits 1 per cent of the
greenhouse gases that raising ruminants like cows and sheep does — and it requires far
less water.
Current climate change models indicate temperatures will increase as long as humans continue to
emit greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, but the projections of future precipitation are far
less certain.
The report notes that three business sectors — energy firms, utilities and materials companies — account for 87 percent of scope 1 and 2 emissions,
greenhouse gases that are directly
emitted by a firm's activities, even though they account for
less than 25 percent of all companies on the index.
Moreover, the soils of the mammoth steppe were drier and
emitted less of the
greenhouse gas methane.
Such a system limits the total amount of
greenhouse gases emitted while allowing companies to pay for releasing more or to earn credit for spewing
less.
The low - carbon fuel standard orders providers to reduce the carbon intensity of their fuels by 10 percent by 2020 through efforts such as blending in biofuels that result in
less greenhouse gases emitted when burned.
And of course, the gain means
less oil consumed and fewer
greenhouse gases emitted.
It's a staggering amount of carbon, but so far
less than the
greenhouse gases emitted by countries like the United States or China.
This is much
less than the current «best estimate» of about 3 deg.C, and would imply that there is * not * any unfelt warming «still in the pipeline» from
greenhouse gases we've already
emitted.
Both solutions are
emitting much
less greenhouse gases than fossil fuels.
Raising insects for human consumption uses far
less water, land, and food than livestock, and insects
emit almost no
greenhouse gases.
EPA is not even requiring reporting of
greenhouse gas emissions for sources
emitting less than 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide annually.
Australia and the USA are culpable on two counts, they are producing more
greenhouse gasses than any other nations (considering population sizes) and they are doing
less about controlling their emissions than any of the other major
greenhouse gas emitting nations.
Less than half that target was met last year when 912 million tons of
greenhouse gases were
emitted, according to government data.
When we waste
less energy, we need fewer power plants, which
emit harmful pollutants and heat - trapping
greenhouse gases — especially coal - fired ones.
Of the fossil fuels, natural
gas emits less carbon dioxide than oil (though the
gas itself, methane, is a powerful
greenhouse gas and there are serious leakage problems with its use).
And in fact when you look at the scientific literature, it's an interesting disconnect because the modelers who study emissions and how to control those emissions are generally much more comfortable setting goals in terms of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gas concentrations because that comes more or
less directly out of their models and is much more proximate or more closely connected to what humans actually do to screw up the climate in the first place, which is
emit these
greenhouse gases.
Natural
gas, which burns cleaner than coal and
emits about half as many
greenhouse gases, was responsible for
less than 19 percent of U.S. power generation.
Electricity generators have chosen natural
gas for its affordability and reliability, often replacing coal - fired power plants and
emitting up to 56 percent
less greenhouse gases than coal for the same amount of electricity.
That's right, the latest climate science (some 10 studies published in just the past 3 years) indicates that the earth's climate sensitivity — that is, how much the global average surface temperature will rise as a result of
greenhouse gases emitted from human activities — is some 33 percent
less than scientists thought at the time of the last IPCC Assessment, published in 2007.
Corn ethanol production and use
emits 22 percent
less greenhouse gas than gasoline, according to the October 2007 issue of National Geographic magazine.
Natural
gas generates more than 50 %
less greenhouse gas emissions than coal, not even including the many harmful particulate pollutants coal
emits.
The authors found that wells in the Marcellus region
emit 20 percent to 50 percent
less greenhouse gases than coal used to produce electricity.
The U.S. may
emit more per capita than developing nations, but we use far
less energy and
emit far fewer
greenhouse gases per unit of economic output.
Each of those assessments attempts to account for all the
greenhouse gases emitted during the production and installation of solar cells, as well as how much energy solar cells produce — and, therefore, how much
less carbon is
emitted when switching from fossil fuels.
According to Slate.com and a 2005 University of Chicago study, a lacto - ovo vegetarian
emits far
less greenhouse gas than an individual on a standard, meat - rich American diet — the difference is equivalent to around 1.5 metric tons of carbon dioxide per year, assuming the same daily caloric intake.
-- Yes, it may be correct in so far as they can say that; «around 10 % of the wavebands
emitted by IR radiation are made up of wave - lengths that can not be absorbed by «
Greenhouse Gases» (GHGs), but that can not possibly mean that 0.04 %, in the case of CO2 concentration but certainly
less than 10 % of the Atmosphere as a total has got what must be a «supernatural» ability to stop LWR.
The higher cloud, which is now
emitting all that latent energy like a mofo in longwave, has
less non-condensing
greenhouse gas above it and more below it.
The fact that climate change is likely to deal its harshest blows to
less developed nations is one of the cruel ironies about this issue — considering that it was largely the rich, industrialized world that
emitted the
greenhouse gases that caused the problem in the first place.
But overall, especially with climate, since nearly all of the growth in emissions is going to come in poor countries, if you can't come up with energy choices that are
less greenhouse gas emitting and also are cheap, they are just going to keep burning fossil fuels.