The amount of carbon dioxide
emitted by our coal plants?
In contrast, the CO2 emissions
emitted by a coal plant represents a cumulative contribution to the atmospheric stock of carbon.
Not exact matches
Essentially, sulfur dioxide gets
emitted near the surface, either
by a
coal - fired power
plant's smokestack or a volcano.
The sentence marked with an asterisk was changed from «In fact, fly ash — a
by - product from burning
coal for power — and other
coal waste contains up to 100 times more radiation than nuclear waste» to «In fact, the fly ash
emitted by a power
plant — a
by - product from burning
coal for electricity — carries into the surrounding environment 100 times more radiation than a nuclear power
plant producing the same amount of energy.»
Most electricity in the United States is generated at power
plants that run on
coal and natural gas — fossil fuels that contribute significantly to global warming
by emitting large amounts of carbon dioxide.
Another study, published last year in Reviews of Geophysics, lists the man - made aerosols as coming from sulfates, nitrate and black carbon
emitted by internal combustion engines,
coal - fired power
plants, slash - and - burn agricultural practices, and smoke from cooking.
By their estimations,
coal - fired power
plants coming online since the turn of the millennium will
emit more CO2 than all other human
coal burning has since the dawn of the industrial age: 660 billion metric tons over their 50 - year lifetime versus 524 billion metric tons between 1751 and 2000.
That sulfur dioxide market, run
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has reduced sulfur dioxide levels
by 40 percent since 1992
by allowing companies to buy and sell the right to
emit the acid - rain forming pollution from
coal - burning
plants, which has increased the acidity of lake waters throughout the region.
It is unlikely that all of the CO2
emitted in the U.S. could ever be captured and transported — whether
by pipeline or tanker — to the west coast for injection, but local
coal - fired power
plants might be able to take advantage of the formation.
The results might not have immediate repercussions — nitrogen trifluoride currently adds 0.04 percent of the global warming effect created
by carbon dioxide
emitted from sources such as
coal - burning power
plants and cars.
I criticized this statement, noting that the actual emissions from U.S.
coal - burning power
plants declined only from 16.1 million tons to 12.4 million tons between 1980 and 1998 in the case of sulfur dioxide and from 6.1 million tons to 5.4 million tons between 1980 and 1998 in the case of nitrogen oxides (mostly
emitted as NO, not NO2, but
by convention measured as tons of NO2 - equivalent).
Study lead author Michael Raupach, GCP co-chair and atmospheric physicist at Australia's Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, says it will take economic, policy and social changes to reverse the trend, such as capturing the CO2
emitted by coal - fired power
plants and increased international cooperation.
Both are pollutants, but the first is dominated
by sulphate emissions from
coal burning power
plants, the second from ozone precursors such as NOx, volatile organic compounds, and carbon monoxide mainly
emitted from vehicles.
Fine particles
emitted by vehicles (especially diesel - powered ones),
coal - fired power
plants, and burning wood can penetrate deep into the lungs, while car exhaust, heat, and sunlight contribute to high ozone levels.
First, given the events of the past weeks in financial markets, I'm not sure how these groups intend to build confidence in a market trading a ton of carbon that is avoided
by protecting a forest acre in, say, Borneo, for a ton
emitted by a
coal - burning power
plant in Boston.
Andy points to the erstwhile dilemma posed
by mercury - thanks to the Times interminable editorializing about the tons of quicksilver
emitted by coal fired power
plants several states upwind, many Manhattanites fear Minimata Disease should they crack open a window.
Rudolph W. Giuliani called for moving from energy rhetoric to action, using the popular Republican phrasing «clean
coal,» a phrase with no meaning in the climate context until someone comes up with a cheap way to capture and store carbon dioxide
emitted by power
plants on the scale of billions of tons a year.
Among other initiatives, we're proud to have reduced our greenhouse gas emissions intensity
by more than 30 % since 1990; to be the initial developer of a supercritical
coal plant that will emit 15 % lower carbon dioxide than existing plants; to be a founding member of the FutureGen Alliance; to be a part of Australia's low - carbon Coal 21 program; and to be the only non-Chinese partner in China's zero - emissions GreenGen proj
coal plant that will
emit 15 % lower carbon dioxide than existing
plants; to be a founding member of the FutureGen Alliance; to be a part of Australia's low - carbon
Coal 21 program; and to be the only non-Chinese partner in China's zero - emissions GreenGen proj
Coal 21 program; and to be the only non-Chinese partner in China's zero - emissions GreenGen project.
At a plausible GHG emissions price of $ 50 / t CO2eq under a future US carbon mitigation policy, such co-production systems competing as power suppliers would be able to provide low - GHG -
emitting synthetic fuels at the same unit cost as for
coal synfuels characterized
by ten times the GHG emission rate that are produced in
plants having three times the synfuel output capacity and requiring twice the total capital investment.
In addition, closer to New Jersey, Governor Chris Christie and Commissioner Martin have called on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to expedite action to reduce pollutants
emitted by the Portland Generating Station, a
coal - fired power
plant operated
by RRI Energy in Northampton County, Pennsylvania, directly across the Delaware River from Knowlton, New Jersey.
China's biggest cities are choking on smog and air pollution
emitted by nearby
coal plants, and residents are fed up....
Last year, he sued to block a rule restricting how much mercury could be
emitted into the air
by coal plants.
Colorado's
coal - and natural gas - fired power
plants harm public health
by emitting smog - forming pollution.
New and refurbished
coal - fired power
plants will not be eligible for funding unless they
emit less than 550 grams of carbon dioxide per kilowatt - hour (gCO2 / kW), which could be met either
by a combined heat and power
plant or one that also burns biomass.
EPA did relax the CCS requirement, but did so simply
by requiring less of
coal plants»
emitted carbon to be captured.
The most energy - intensive type of PV cell to make — the monocrystalline silicate cells — only
emits 1.8 ounces of global warming pollution per kilowatt hour, compared to 2.2 pounds
by a
coal - fired power
plant.
In our scenario, the remaining
coal plants in 2030 are expected to
emit 165 Mt.. This means that Germany will overshoot its abatement target
by 85 Mt in 2030, reaching a 62 percent reduction instead of the 55 percent that is decided politically.
In the years prior to 1985, several publications reported the scientific consensus that acid rain
emitted by coal - fired electricity generation
plants belching sulfur dioxide was destroying vast swathes of forests and lakes in the eastern United States.
But to capture from the air the amount of carbon dioxide
emitted by, say, a 1,000 - megawatt
coal power
plant, it would require air - sucking machinery about 30 feet in height and 18 miles in length, according to a study
by the American Physical Society, as well as huge collection facilities and a network of equipment to transport and store the waste underground.
«A power
plant burning wood chips will typically
emit one and a half times the carbon dioxide of a
plant burning
coal and at least three times the carbon dioxide
emitted by a power
plant burning natural gas.
The researchers found that wood pellets burned in European and UK power
plants, such as the Drax facility in North Yorkshire — which has transitioned some of its
coal power generation capacity to wood pellets with the support of UK government subsidies — actually
emit more CO2 per kilowatt hour than that generated
by coal.
The air and water pollution
emitted by coal and natural gas
plants is linked with breathing problems, neurological damage, heart attacks, cancer, premature death, and a host of other serious problems.
David Cameron, the leader of the conservative party and possibly the next primer minister of the UK, said today that a Conservative government would put a tax on the carbon
emitted by coal and natural gas power
plants.
That sulfur dioxide market, run
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), has reduced sulfur dioxide levels
by 40 percent since 1992
by allowing companies to buy and sell the right to
emit the acid - rain forming pollution from
coal - burning
plants, which has increased the acidity of lake waters throughout the region.
Hence in this latter comparison, which primarily compares the effect of the CO2 and CH4
emitted by these two sectors (and hence the leak rate threshold decreases with a nearer - term perspective), even very small leak rates would make the mean natural gas
plant as environmentally damaging as
coal.
The EPA estimates that its rule will reduce
by 90 percent the amount of mercury
emitted by coal - fired power
plants, the nation's largest source of mercury pollution.