Sentences with phrase «emitting more»

«By emitting more and more greenhouse gases we might trigger responses now that we may not be able to stop in the future.»

Fortunately, the EPA has started to crack down on companies that are emitting more than the legally permissible threshold of HCFCs.

For its part, the Communist Chinese regime — which is the world's biggest emitter of CO2, emitting more than the United States and Canada combined — gets a free ride, essentially, burning fossils fuels to its heart's content, for the next 15 years.

All of them emitting more GHG in their destination here they were in their point of origin.

If a black box in your room was next to a white box, according to SB they should be different temperatures and the black should be emitting more radiation than the white box, meaning they ought to have different temperatures.

«Several EU countries are still emitting more greenhouse gases than they did in 1990 or even increased their emissions from 2004 to 2005.

I beg to differ with the viewpoint that the belief that humans exert fundamental (100 % attribution) control over the melting of ice sheets and the raising or lowering of sea levels or the temperatures of the deep oceans by emitting more or less fossil fuels is a «mainstream» view.

First of all energy out doesn't decline in greenhouse theory because the atmosphere heats up emitting more energy.

The system would affect facilities emitting more than 25,000 tons a year (roughly 100 businesses in the state), though obviously costs would filter down to consumers.

IPS: Thawing permafrost is emitting more climate - heating carbon faster than previously realised.

He confirmed that China (and India) would be the primary CO2 emitters of the 21st century, that they «have a right» to develop their economies even if this means emitting more CO2 and that any CO2 curtailment activities made by the already industrialized nations of North America, Europe plus Japan will be futile unless China and India join in.

Will emitting more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere cause tornadoes in Los Angeles and massive floods in the Himalayas?

If the earth keeps emitting more energy than it absorbs, it will cool down.

The reason for the accumulation is simple: Human activities are emitting more carbon dioxide than the planet's natural processes (uptake by plants and the ocean) can remove.

The air actually loses energy by emitting more, so the net IR effect in the atmosphere is one of cooling, and this is what happens in the stratosphere.

But so do termites, by emitting more methane than all the world's farm animals combined.

-- and then produce their own actual satellite data proving the Earth is actually emitting more to space over the 1979 to 2005 period — which is the end of the Nimbus satellite program!

Agriculture is among the greatest contributors to global warming, emitting more greenhouse gases than all our cars, trucks, trains, and airplanes combined - largely from methane released by cattle and rice farms, nitrous oxide from fertilized fields and carbon dioxide from the cutting of rain forests to grow crops or raise livestock.

In point of fact it's physically impossible for the entire earth to ever be more than 10C everywhere at equilibrium as that would have it emitting more power than it receives from the sun which would violate conservation.

«increasing the RF on the Earth, by emitting more CO2, will automatically lead to a warmer Earth», is not only unproven but flies against hundreds of millions of years of actual evidence.

Shakhova et al (2010) reports that the continental shelf of East Central Siberia (ECS), with an area of over 2 million km2, is emitting more methane than all other ocean sources combined.

Short flights are the worst, emitting more CO2 per mile traveled than medium to longer flights.

The US transport sector is emitting more carbon dioxide than power generation for the first time since the 1970s.

This is not an unknown fact that humans have been emitting more carbon -LSB-...]

So even though humans have been emitting more and more CO2, less and less is accumulated.

And, the upper regions of the troposphere are emitting more energy from clouds than they would be if the skies were clear.

The logic is straightforward: Plants need atmospheric carbon dioxide to produce food, and by emitting more CO2 into the air, our cars and factories create new sources of plant nutrition that will cause some crops and trees to grow bigger and faster.

Humans are emitting more than twice as much CO2 as what ends up staying there.

Your wish to collect energy when you are emitting more than your are receiving is as bonkers as your pseudoscience claims, rather like your claims that over 150 years of established science based on empirical validations is wrong — and all because you do not understand the 2nd law of thermodynamics.

The truth is if you produce power using old power plants, you're going to be emitting more carbon — but to upgrade those plants, energy's going to be a little bit more expensive, at least on the front end.

I think it's important to point out that while China may be emitting more CO2 than we are at the moment, we the US, and the developed world overall, are still responsible for the overwhelming majority of the excess (beyond pre-industrial levels) CO2 in the atmosphere.

Since evidence of GW has continued to pour in and become stronger & stronger (and since I'm saving heaps of money by abating it), I don't think any contrarian or scientist can convince me to start emitting more GHGs, even if it becomes 100 % certain AGW is not happening.

As I discussed in # 333, requiring a warmer lower part of the atmosphere, on warming further and emitting more IR, to cause a cooler part receiving the excess IR to cool further, violates radiative transfer principles and / or the Second Law.

If all goes according to its industry - heavy plans, each of the nation's residents will soon be emitting more than 8 times the average American.

We buy everything from China and complain that their industries are emitting more carbon dioxide.

Under your different model scenarios, is there even one that has China not emitting more than the «danger limit»?

The US is apparently emitting more than we thought we were, maybe 30 Tg CH4 per year.

The shutter restricting the time and the sensor emitting more or less light based on what you want.

Like the art style, the sound effects are very cartoon - like rather than emitting a more serious feel; nothing over-the-top, but it does nicely finish and package everything together quite nicely.

It also falls short in terms of running costs, managing less than 40mpg on the official test, while emitting more than 170g / km of C02.

In no way a normally aspirated engine will be performance wise comparable to a similar turbo engine but in order for certain car manufacturers such as Toyota, to meet the emissions criteria it is preferable to invest in a normal aspirated engine of 1.5 lt i.o. the present 1.3 lt so that the cost of the relevant car, Yaris, remains low and is not effecting its sales as it would if they chose to use the 1.2 lt turbo they use on the CH - R which is also relatively emitting more.

Our 500 watt full spectrum infrared heaters are over 25 times more powerful than the closest competitor emitting more near, mid and far infrared.

For the past month or so, Indonesia has been emitting more greenhouse gases daily than the entire United States economy.

Over the next two years, iPTF14hls would dim and brighten at least five times, at one point emitting more light than three billion suns.

Shakhova et al (2010) reports that the continental shelf of East Central Siberia (ECS), with an area of over 2 million km2, is emitting more methane than all other ocean sources combined.

In contrast, the new distance means the nebula is emitting no more energy than the pulsar can provide.

Landfills may be emitting more methane than previously reported because the Environmental Protection Agency may be drastically underestimating how much garbage is being deposited in landfills across the U.S., according to a new Yale University study.

Just as oil and natural gas fields have been found to be emitting more methane than official government estimates suggest, a new study shows that more methane than previously thought may be leaking from the other end of that system — cities, where people actually use natural gas for heating and cooking.

Aldy's scheme would require emitting no more than 0.4 tons of C02 for every MWh of power starting in 2015.

Because it seemed relatively bright despite this distance, astronomers calculated that it must be emitting more infrared energy than any other known object.