Lets try using logic instead of
emotion for religion to choose our next president people.
Not exact matches
It's a
religion, inspiring the sort of
emotion usually reserved
for debates over whether or not God exists.
There is still no explanation
for the spontaneous origin of the universe, as well as the advanced cognition of the brain (chemicals and genetics reveal general trends, but no one knows how complete thoughts are actually formed, nor
emotions or personalities); creation and the human conscious, the two fundamental focuses of
religion.
No different than my rambling post agreeing with him and providing even more real life human scenarios that can evoke strong
emotions, that can easily cause someone to either A: Seek out
religion, even if it's only
for some semblance of accepttion and / or explanation of the unknown, or B: If they already have a
religion, re-embracing it with new enthusiasm.
Why not form an opinion totally based on how you «feel» or your «
emotions» and justify your argument on why you feel that way, rather than saying «
for the bible tells me so»... That's why we can't move forward on issues in this country; people feel they can't express themselves without the safety of a group's opinion... Let's listen to ourselves
for once instead of having your daddy's politics and
religion handed down to you like a family asset.
Living on the frontier, their lives always in danger from Indian attacks, struggling against nature
for a living, accustomed to the raw, untamed life, these people were prepared
for revivalistic
religion which touched the
emotions.
One result of the process — which certainly Mark would not have encouraged, though his work started the development in that direction — is the sentimental, saccharine, sickly - sweet Jesuolatry that has mistaken strong
emotion for an evidence of
religion, has softened the ethical fiber and beclouded the whole theological sky of certain areas of Christianity.
In response to the first claim, Pelikan quotes Lionel Trilling: «It is probably true that when the dogmatic principle in
religion is slighted,
religion goes along
for a while on generalized
emotion and ethical intention — «morality touched by
emotion,»» but it «then loses the force of its impulse and even the essence of Its being.»
If
religion is to mean anything definite
for us, it seems to me that we ought to take it as meaning this added dimension of
emotion, this enthusiastic temper of espousal, in regions where morality strictly so called can at best but bow its head and acquiesce.
The saintly character is the character
for which spiritual
emotions are the habitual centre of the personal energy; and there is a certain composite photograph of universal saintliness, the same in all
religions, of which the features can easily be traced.
For the secular orthodox, all
religion is merely «subjective», based on
emotion, wish or faulty inference, and therefore false.
Whitehead explains the need
for religion to be grounded in a philosophical understanding: «
Religion requires a metaphysical backing;
for its authority is endangered by the intensity of the
emotions which it generates.
Whitehead says, «
For religion is concerned with our reactions of purpose and
emotion due to our personal measure of intuition into the ultimate mystery of the universe.»
If
religion does that, it admits that its dogmas are merely pleasing ideas
for the purpose of stimulating its
emotions.
But look at other Islamic Arabs majority countries such Egypt, Sudan, All North African Countries you would find Worship houses
for Muslims, Christians, Jews and God know what else and been living
for years in Peace and Respect until this Era since WW's + 1948 unjust decisions the world is changing badly separating brothers of one blood in different faith & beliefs become to doubt each other in to some race towards power and dominance over each other in to some Jungle Laws, this has brought negative feeling and
emotions among all multi
religion cultures that were living and trading in peace...!
For about a century now, no other issue in American Jewish life has evoked as much
emotion and energy at the local level as has the struggle to keep
religion out of their children's schools.
For an ethical consciousness to take bold it must be a vital part of life; this truth is neatly expressed in Matthew Arnold's summary of the ethical value of
religion as «morality lighted by
emotion.»
The chat rooms
for singles are designed to help men and women, regardless of their
religion, perspectives, race, culture and ethnicity, by providing them a platform where they can freely and comfortably search
for their soul mates, expressing their true
emotions.
This in - strument encompasses 15 coping dimensions, namely, active coping, planning, suppression of competing activities, restraint coping, seeking social support
for instrumental reasons, seeking social support
for emotional reasons, positive re-interpretation and growth, acceptance, turning to
religion, focus on and venting
emotions, denial, behavioral disengagement, mental disengagement, alcohol - drug disengagement, and joking, operationalized through 60 items.