I personally am a hard - headed rationalist and emotional arguments don't appeal to me.
Not exact matches
«Rational
arguments do not convince people who have
emotional biases about something.
Further, if one removes the
emotional aspect from whichever belief is held, it must be conceded that Ham
did offer an objective and indisputable fact concerning how the public school system has intentionally excluded the intelligent design
argument.
It is an
emotional argument that
does not change or challenge reality.
In fact, there is a strong moral
argument that convincingly (to me, at least) describes why it is immoral to «deaden your acuteness» to the intuitions that are becoming
emotional stumbling blocks to belief, that these emotions are there for a reason, and they should not be deadened — especially if God doesn't exist.
Standardized test results don't take into account how factors outside of a teacher's control impact student performance on the day the test is taken; these include factors such as whether or not the student slept and ate well prior to the test, social and
emotional occurrences (e.g., student's parents are going through a divorce, there is a serious illness in the family, student had an
argument with a best friend just before the class in which the test is given, student doesn't feel well that day).
I've heard both
arguments; however, I'm more inclined to
do what I feel would be the best
emotional decision for me.
A handful of
emotional retorts and ill - conceived
arguments that have nothing to
do with the inquiry itself (e.g., «Market timing is stupid» or «There are lots of individual stocks that are fairly priced right now,» etc.).
and when people resort to
emotional arguments on a scientific subject in order to get me to
do something, i immediately grab my wallet, because it's going to cost me.
But I don't see that as a credible
argument, especially since the child's encapsulated persecutory delusion is resulting in the loss for the child of an affectionally bonded relationship with a beloved and loving normal - range parent who is a vital component for the child's healthy
emotional and psychological development.
It's important for couples to understand the nature of relationship conflict and the
emotional wounds that occur — to become more fully conscious of which misunderstandings and
arguments have the potential to
do irreparable relationship damage.
There are couples that are not part of the Four Horsemen and their
arguments don't escalate, they avoid conflict altogether and don't self - disclose or have
emotional engagement.
But just because relationship conflict is to be expected doesn't mean that you and your spouse / partner can not learn the skills needed to effectively communicate in order to get your needs met, reduce unnecessary
arguments, and build better understanding and
emotional intimacy.
Honesty, but don't tell... Let bygones be, but tally the future... Be reasonable and don't give in to anger, emotions, but adopt these illogical
arguments based on their
emotional appeal...
So in a sense, even if you
do calm down after being upset, you've still lost, because those biochemicals are going to hang out in your brain, making
arguments or
emotional withdrawal much easier.