Not exact matches
Sex between unmarried adults might be inside that gray area between the ideal and the immoral if, first, no one's marriage is being violated by either party; second, if it is a union
of love and caring, not just a union
of convenience and desire; third, if sex is shared only after other
things have been shared, other
things such as time,
values, friendship, communication and a sense
of deep trust and
emotional responsibility; fourth, if it is both loving and discreet, private, shielded from those who would not or could not understand; if it is
valued as a bond between the two people involved and between them alone, never violating the sacredness
of the exclusive quality
of that moment.
Adults are weighing a spectrum
of considerations and
values —
things like constitutional freedoms, political orientation, safety, and the
emotional well being
of students.
Set forth below is the text
of a comment that I recently posted to the discussion thread for one
of my columns at the
Value Walk site: «Everything that you are describing is the sort
of thing that you would expect to see when the P / E10 level is where it is today in the event that Shiller is right and stock investing really is a highly
emotional endeavor.»
It's all
of the
things you've purchased over the years that no longer have even a sentimental
value; the items that have been cast aside in an abyss
of emotional, financial, and physical clutter.
== -LCB- So the difficult
thing about embracing and properly considering all said factoids, is how to do this without prompting the
emotional responses that immediately occur when people's cultural
values are either challenged or promoted, which leads to endemic domain polarization and the emergence
of cultural consensus based upon the winning narrative. -RCB-
So the difficult
thing about embracing and properly considering all said factoids, is how to do this without prompting the
emotional responses that immediately occur when people's cultural
values are either challenged or promoted, which leads to endemic domain polarization and the emergence
of cultural consensus based upon the winning narrative.
Generally speaking, aside from very specific types
of cases involving contracts, or specific types
of statutory relief, a Plaintiff typically includes counts for
things like NIED (negligent infliction
of emotional distress), pain and suffering, loss
of consortium, loss
of future earning capacity — these are a few
of the types
of counts whereby there is no specific
value a defendant could ever point to being «fully satisfied» — the reason being, a jury needs to determine the legitimate
value of these claims unless the Plaintiff accepts a settlement award whereby he / she / it feels as if it's fully satisfied.
Secondly, as a Gottman therapist I see the
value in incremental behavior change («small
things often»), but where is the friendship,
emotional connection, mutually respectful management
of conflict, making life dreams come true, and shared meaning in the training
of one's partner like an animal in captivity.