Sentences with phrase «empirical data support»

«Altogether, the empirical data support a high sensitivity of sea level to global temperature change, and they provide strong evidence against the seeming lethargy and large hysteresis effects that occur in at least some ice sheet models.»

Altogether, the empirical data support a high sensitivity of the sea level to global temperature change, and they provide strong evidence against the seeming lethargy and large hysteresis effects that occur in at least some ice sheet models.

Critics complain that this massive change to American education — one of the most significant shifts ever — was rushed through without any real democratic process or empirical data supporting the value.

Yet another comment totally devoid of any empirical data supporting your climate alarmism groupthink, totally failing to refute anything that I posted, and in total denial of the fact that your CatastrophicAGW - by - CO2 groupthink is not science, but religion, cult religion, peddling propaganda, because empirical data (science) doesn't support it.

Sorry, but repeating your climate cult propaganda which only makes empirical evidence - free CLAIMS and does NOT include any empirical data supporting your pseudoscience only further exposes you as a fanatical, scientifically illiterate duped climate cult zealot.

Global warming emerged as a very strong hypothesis in the then - obscure scientific discipline of climate science in the 1980's with mounting empirical data supporting the human role in increases in greenhouse gas emissions, particularly carbon dioxide.

This post includes empirical data supporting natural variability.

These were local phenomena and there are no empirical data supporting the notion that human aerosols caused a 30 - year cycle of slight global cooling, despite rapidly accelerating increases in CO2 emissions and concentrations.

The first part of the talk will focus on empirical data supporting the effectiveness of schema therapy for chronic depression.

Not exact matches

Data driven — Readers are more apt to trust content strongly supported by empirical dData driven — Readers are more apt to trust content strongly supported by empirical datadata.

This is the result of many erroneous assumptions in the theory that the empirical data simply doesn't support.

(disclosure — I teach these courses in my school and the students are required to research and ID empirical data from OECD, IMF, Bloomberg, Capital IQ etc. to support their arguments).

It is intuitive (looking inside oneself) and, like faith, involves an adherence to an explanation that is neither supported by empirical data or testable.

From this perspective, and it can be supported from the history of modern philosophy as well, the modern period has been one that appealed away from reason to history, empirical data, and practice.

In the absence of empirical data to support these claims, Mill simply appeals to his readers to make their own observations; he asserts that in doing so, they will recognize that pleasure or happiness is in fact the sole object of desire (U 49).

Indeed the General Secretary of our Bishops» conference is quoted as saying last April that there is no «empirical data» to support Cardinal Bertone's comments linking paedophilia and homosexuality.

If you lead with empirical data, however, you've told your audience «here's a problem, here's the data that supports the existence of the problem, here's my suggestion for a solution.»

Dr. Webbe: I am not aware of any empirical data that would support this ban for U11.

Moreover, although it seems almost de rigueur for apologists for soccer heading to comment that heading is much safer when proper technique is employed, I know of no empirical data that support the contention.

These results suggest that without valid population - level data, speculations regarding the role of energy intake in the rise in the prevalence of obesity are without empirical support, he said.

Using empirical data from this monitoring and from ongoing field studies the convention would support, scientists could more thoroughly assess surveys» cumulative long - term impacts on marine life and identify areas where seismic activities should be prohibited or temporarily limited to protect important habitats or vulnerable populations.

«Unfortunately, the empirical data don't support it that well.»

The validity of the results was supported by the high correlation between the empirical results of total drag on the skier mannequin in a wind tunnel and corresponding data in the computer simulations.

«Given the number of visitors who are keen to observe and learn from our experiences, it has become important that we provide evidence - based information and empirical data that supports the information we provide.

First of all, the empirical data do not support the CRP claims.

This essay draws on both empirical and anecdotal data to evaluate the potential impacts of this transition, and concludes that the location at which support services are provided to pregnant teens is less important than the quality and accessibility of the services themselves.

«Picking the «Vette is the obvious choice since it's supported by ample empirical data.

However, the study's conclusions beyond this point are not supported by the empirical data and ignore the plain realities facing student loan borrowers.

It appears quite obvious that investor expectations are low, including your own, and I think all the empirical data about investors views on the stock market support this but if you disagree, fine, I don't feel any need to argue about it.

Do you have some actual empirical data to support those assertions?

I COULD go on, but why bother, when a pure theoretician, assumes the Solar Systen is made up out of constants, and there are no empirical data (the one paper he does cite seems to be all over the place with time scaling issues though) to support the multitude of his various claims.

As well as your objections, the number 5.35 is based on the hypothetical numbers derived from the estimations of climate sensitivity and the output of non-validated models, and have absolutely no meaning whatsoever, since there is no empirical data to support them.

You lose, because you have no empirical data to support your pseudoscience religion of CatastrophicAGW - by - CO2..

1) deny the reality and fail to refute the fact that the mainstream climate science of the mid-1900s documented that fact that your CO2 hypothesis was never widely held and was rejected as a fringe theory that was not supported by the real world empirical data and

If such a signal existed, it would, indeed, be strong empirical data to support a numeric value of total climate sensitivity; the rise of surface temperature as a result as a result of adding CO2 to the atmopshere.

I keep coming back to what has troubled me for a long time; the lack of empirical data, hard measured data, to support the various numeric values that are associated with a rise in surface temperatures as a result of adding CO2 to the atmosphere; climate sensitivity.

You fail once again, as you refuted nothing that I posted and you presented no empirical data to support your CO2 climate alarmist dogma.

«That you can't support your claims with any substantive body of research...» The empirical data shows that natural climate variability is still the primary cause of the climate warming of the past century.

You claim there is specific empirical data which somehow supports the values of total climate sensitivity.

That's very nice but, as requested by Jim and me, please cite specific references to empirical evidence (i.e. data derived from actual physical observations or reproducible experimentation) supporting the Myhre et al. quantitative estimate on CO2 radiative forcing.

But you can NOT support your claims with empirical data, because just as I pointed out, and you have failed to refute, there isn't a single peer reviewed paper that empirically shows that anthropogenic CO2 was the primary cause of the late 20th century warming like your climate alarmist religion claims.

Once again you fail to provide any empirical data to support your climate cult beliefs.

On the contrary it's a simple fact that there's very much empirical data to support AGW (and perhaps also CAGW, alhough I don't know, what the C really means).

All your lying and handwaving is only to obfuscate that you can't support your climate cult beliefs with empirical data and science.

My own perspective on this is that it would be a significant departure from earlier work by Trenberth if he really came with empirical evidence (i.e. data based on actual physical observations, rather than simply model simulations) to support his position.

This means that, in a very real sense, the main support we have for Climate Change is the empirical data!

«Creationism» does not have the support of empirical data from observations or lab work.

The IPCC CAGW premise or hypothesis has not yet been supported by empirical scientific data, nor has it successfully withstood falsification attempts — as a result it remains an uncorroborated hypothesis, nothing more.

There is absolutely no empirical data whatsoever to support it.

It does not matter what aspect of CAGW is discussed, the warmists can always point to a paper in the peer reviewed literature that supports their hypothesis, except for one aspect; the empirical data.