Sentences with phrase «empirical evidence for these claims»

You call athiests crazy because we demand empirical evidence for your claim of the exisitance of a being outside of nature that affects your / my / our lives daily.

He does not, however, go on to offer any direct empirical evidence for this claim.

But there's no empirical evidence for these claims.

I'm curious whether you have a survey report or other empirical evidence for the claim, «In all but a few districts, school boards make [the reelection] decision based on principals» or assistant principals» evaluations.»

My claim that their slow adoption may be for other reasons than the stated ones is because I see a dearth of empirical evidence for that claim and instead see common sense observations and anecdotal evidence.

If the recent temperature record statistically significantly deviated from the multi-decadal positive temperature trend, then this would be empirical evidence for the claim something has been different in recent years.

In her article, she provides zero empirical evidence for her claims about the future, much like the shameful and egregious tactics of Master Gore himself.

Not exact matches

Barnett contends that the criticisms of a strong patent - rights system overlook recent empirical evidence and have overestimated the impact and scope of problems including «patent trolls» (firms that own patents but do not manufacture products), «royalty stacks» (the total demands of multiple intellectual property holders for remuneration leave too little revenue left for the manufacturer), and «patent thickets» (complex and conflicting legal claims that increase transaction costs for manufacturers).

«You're a fool» But thanks for supplying empirical evidence for such a massive claim.

I lack a belief in a god or gods because there is simply NO empirical evidence to support such a claim — for YOUR version or anyone else's.

An atheist will not value an acceptance of something not founded upon empirical evidence as a good reason for an outrageous claim.

And what empirical evidence do you claim for the existance of god, jesus, etc..

Theology can not be historically empirical in the sense that claims about Jesus» special relationship to God could be proved by historical evidence, for the evidence will always be consistent with various speculative hypotheses.

In fact, the claim that it is not the whole truth can not be empirically refuted, for the inevitably relative perspective of any scientific observer precludes his reception of empirical evidence for a non-relative spatio - temporal perspective.

But where, he asks, is empirical evidence for such claims?

And why do you claim that there could be no empirical evidence for god because he is a person, when clearly you agree he is not?

Others, like me, are convinced that no theoretical or empirical evidence exists for such a claim, and that a widespread belief in the existence of such a point of no return threatens to push ecological science and its application in the wrong direction.

For example, hundreds of years of empirical evidence have shown that garlic can help reduce high blood pressure and lower cholesterol, and modern research has corroborated this claim and has also identified the unique amino acids responsible.

His concern was that the phrase «scientifically proven» should be reserved for claims that are supported by impartial empirical evidence.

Our claim that these practices ought to be considered essential for successful leaders is based on reviews of empirical research and on illustrative original studies carried out in educational contexts.116 We also rely on a synthesis of evidence about managerial skills, compiled by Yukl (2002).

Writing Task The Lesson Level Learning Goal for this task is: Construct and present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support the claim that activities such as deforestation or reforestation can cause changes in the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

Contrary to the widespread claim that vouchers do not benefit participants and hurt public schools, the empirical evidence consistently shows vouchers improve outcomes for participants and public schools.

There is a wealth of empirical evidence — both qualitative and quantitative — that supports the claim that alternative schools for pregnant teens can have a positive impact on not only the educational outcomes of teen parents, but also the health outcomes of both parents and children.

PS Inasmuch as climatologists have been modeling around on this for twenty years, and still no one has provided the empirical evidence to support the CAGW claim of IPCC, I can only assume that it does not exist.

What I mean is simply that we have as much actual empirical evidence for the existence of even one unicorn in this world as we have for the basic AGW claim that more CO2 in the atmosphere can, will and does cause a net rise in Earth's average global surface temperature, i.e. NONE whatsoever!

-- If a scientific claim is involved, check for empirical evidence to support this claim: is the claim supported by actual physical observations or reproducible experimentation?

What empirical evidence do you have for this claim?

You just would claim that there was no empirical evidence for the hypotheses, because something like the IPCC and their reports didn't exist, wouldn't you?

You have given me a lot of verbiage and most recently a list of items, which I have gone through point by point to demonstrate to you that you have provided no empirical evidence to support the IPCC CAGW claim (as I outlined it for you, based on the AR4 report).

Unfortunately for said alarmists, the empirical evidence completely undercuts claims that warming causes bad weather - essentially, the claims are all hype for several reasons.

Claims of rapid, accelerating, dangerous and unequivocal global warming from CO2 and other greenhouse gases means that should be happening... especially for the oceans that represent about 72 % of the Earth's surface... yet the latest empirical evidence shows the above adjectives are big fat lies when it comes to this gigantic thermal sink... Ooops... those stubborn facts strike again...

This empirical evidence strongly counters any claim that changes in human CO2 emissions, up or down, can be viewed as a «control knob» or «thermostat» for Earth's temperature and climate.

In summary, your argument pointing to the lacking statistical significance of the temperature trend estimate for a time period is not sufficient empirical / statistical evidence or scientific justification for the claim that there was a «pause» of global surface / troposphere warming.

... why we aren't using empirical evidence (as it accumulates) to reject failing models and concentrate on the ones that come closest to working, while also not using the models that are obviously not working in any sort of «average» claim for future warming.

So I would recommend — modestly — that skeptics try very hard not to buy into this and redirect all such discussions to questions such as why the models are in such terrible disagreement with each other, even when applied to identical toy problems that are far simpler than the actual Earth, and why we aren't using empirical evidence (as it accumulates) to reject failing models and concentrate on the ones that come closest to working, while also not using the models that are obviously not working in any sort of «average» claim for future warming.

Throughout the consultation process the claimant lobby has expressed concerns about the viability of a new system being launched for 70 % of the accident claims market which has not been piloted nor based on empirical evidence.

Some of those making these assertions claim that they have conducted research (for example, «our research that has scanned across North America we can find no empirical evidence...».

The other discourse is found in clinical practice, non-academic literature and on the Internet where claims are made which have no basis in attachment theory and for which there is no empirical evidence.