Sentences with phrase «empirical evidence supporting this claim»

Symbolization and magic go hand in hand and remain associated quite independently of the empirical evidence supporting the claimed power.

There has not, however, been much empirical evidence supporting this claim or calculating how large an effect later start times might have.

Not exact matches

There's some empirical evidence to support the claim that rate cuts promote investment.

I lack a belief in a god or gods because there is simply NO empirical evidence to support such a claim — for YOUR version or anyone else's.

This, of course, is an empirical claim, and there is, to be blunt, practically no empirical evidence to support it.

I have to use logic and reason due to the utter lack of empirical scientific evidence to support the god claim.

There is little or no empirical evidence supporting Darwin's claim of macroevolution yet on «faith» someday we will prove it.

Until you can prove your claim that there is a God and you have empirical evidence to support your claim then everything else is just hyperbole.

Ok, Johnny Mo, I will... they ALL have the same problem — that is, none of them have any supporting evidence and the claims of each lack empirical falsafiability.

2) Provide a well designed experiment that would be able to test the hypothesis that» «fine tuning» is empirical evidence that supports the claim that the god of Israel exists.»

His concern was that the phrase «scientifically proven» should be reserved for claims that are supported by impartial empirical evidence.

Thankfully, there is an increasing amount of research that is finding the empirical evidence required to support the claims the benefits of mobile learning to the educational community.

Writing Task The Lesson Level Learning Goal for this task is: Construct and present an oral and written argument supported by empirical evidence and scientific reasoning to support the claim that activities such as deforestation or reforestation can cause changes in the carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.

There is, it's called SEL, and there is mounting empirical evidence to support the claim that SEL provides teachers with the strategies, culture, and collaboration they need in their school day to reduce their stress and optimize their teaching.

There is a wealth of empirical evidence — both qualitative and quantitative — that supports the claim that alternative schools for pregnant teens can have a positive impact on not only the educational outcomes of teen parents, but also the health outcomes of both parents and children.

There is zero empirical evidence to support this claim, to my knowledge.

It merely made an evidence - free CLAIM «An increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations induces higher temperatures», but provided ZERO empirical science to support that cCLAIM «An increase in atmospheric CO2 concentrations induces higher temperatures», but provided ZERO empirical science to support that claimclaim.

Thus you must show them all wrong before your claim on the lack of empirical evidence is supported.

Sorry, but repeating your climate cult propaganda which only makes empirical evidence - free CLAIMS and does NOT include any empirical data supporting your pseudoscience only further exposes you as a fanatical, scientifically illiterate duped climate cult zealot.

There is no empirical evidence to support assertions and computer models that claim carbon dioxide drives climate change or to suggest that greenhouse gases have supplanted the complex natural forces that have produced big and little ice ages, floods and droughts, and stormy and quiescent periods throughout Earth's history.

Poor Robert is so dim that you don't understand that it is YOUR claims that are not supported by empirical evidence.

PS Inasmuch as climatologists have been modeling around on this for twenty years, and still no one has provided the empirical evidence to support the CAGW claim of IPCC, I can only assume that it does not exist.

-- If a scientific claim is involved, check for empirical evidence to support this claim: is the claim supported by actual physical observations or reproducible experimentation?

You have given me a lot of verbiage and most recently a list of items, which I have gone through point by point to demonstrate to you that you have provided no empirical evidence to support the IPCC CAGW claim (as I outlined it for you, based on the AR4 report).

Yet, the empirical evidence from NOAA does not support those claims.

However, I noticed in one of his recent postings that he deliberately avoided claiming that there was any empirical evidence to support the various estimates of climate sensitivity.

There is no empirical evidence to support such a claim, but that hasn't stopped the leftists / liberals / progressives / Democrats from lying to the public about this issue.

The Court also noted that the CBSA's position was based on what the Tribunal found to be «impressionistic» evidence, rather than empirical or objective evidence, in support of its claim that it could not accommodate Ms Johnstone.

The paper observes that the empirical evidence does support the claim that «non-lawyer ownership can, in some circumstances, lead to new innovation in legal services, greater competition, larger economies of scale, and new compensation structures».

Although intuitively appealed and abundantly supported by empirical evidence, this claim was often tested by looking at groups in a static manner.