Sentences with phrase «employee rights question»

Not exact matches

One question that can help determine if someone is an employee is «Does the company control or have the right to control what the worker does and how the worker does his or her job?»

Another former employee said that while there are no «right» answers to these questions, there are «appropriate» answers, in the sense that what someone reveals about their thinking and value system either fits or doesn't fit into what is expected of the role in question.

Allow employees to ask the right questions and encourage a creative process for mining their best thinking.

Go completely paperless and choose a system that guides employees through electronic signup with benefits experts available to answer questions like, «Which plan is right for me?»

Ask yourself these three questions, and you'll be able to determine which employees are truly the right fit at your company.

To uncover whether a prospective employee is right for your startup, make sure you ask these five questions.

Third, if the bad behaviour in question suggests such poor judgment that the employee simply could no longer be trusted, then an employer might well be right to let him or her go.

For example, The Economist has devoted this entire week to an open, online discussion devoted to the question: «Should businesses work to advance the rights of LGBT people broadly, rather than focusing only on their own employees?»

DiGenova, whose comments were rebroadcast on Tuesday night on Hannity's Fox News program — which Trump is known to watch regularly — also said that a series of questions purported to come from Mueller's office were an «intrusion» on the president's constitutional right to «fire any executive branch employee.»

Having such a wide range of employees answering questions that are tweeted to @Twelpforce helps ensure that there's always someone with the right knowledge set available to respond.

If the answer to question 2 is «Yes» then the ruling is correct and the non-related benefits of the health insurance the company was giving their employees out of charity where the employee did not contribute is within their rights to modify and adjust based on any company policy whether it be faith based or just a CEO's whim.

more importantly the cafe (and every other cafe) should make sure to clarify its policies and let all employees know that mommy and baby have every right to be there and that the only question that the waiter / waitress should ask is «can i freshen your capachino?».

Despite these clear legal obligations, Palmer said, «Our organizations have received many complaints and questions from parenting employees and students who do not know their lactation rights, have faced difficulties when they need to pump milk on the job or during the school day, and do not know who to turn to within the school community for help.»

The law in question takes away nearly all collective bargaining rights from public workers and also forces state employees to contribute more toward their pension and health care benefits, amounting to an 8 percent pay cut.

4) In the Town Board's view what is the «right forum to bring these questions forward» given that Superintendent Ballard believes that «I will NOT entertain any more discussions on this» is a satisfactory response to those members of the public and those employees of the Town who are raising questions?

When UCHC contested the right of its postdocs to organize, it did not question their status as employees.

This lesson will also help to develop students» analysis and evaluation skills through the use of a judgement style question about the importance of particular employee rights in the workplace.

These guides can point employees in the right direction, ask thought - provoking questions, and offer helpful tips.

«More questions than answers remain at this point, not the least of which include who will be part of the planning team, how the new system will be designed, and what will happen to the collective bargaining rights of employees of the Detroit Public Schools and the Education Achievement System,» DPS union leaders wrote in a joint statement.

I've coauthored law review articles where we discuss extensively how the charter school industry claims it is «private» when dealing with questions of employee rights, student discipline policies, student handbooks, or contracts, and «public» in other respects.

I don't usually agree with the BGR Apple employee's, but they were right, he did dance around her questions.

I'm a full time employee SAP Consultant and thanks to this new recession my employer gave me 2 options: leave the company or become a SUB-Contractor, I don't know anything related to SUB-Cons, so obviously I have too many questions about it but I like to focus on the most important right now that is (of course) income, the rules I got are simple for any amount billed to the client the company will keep 25 % and from the remaining amount the company will also deduct another 15 % for employer - taxes, and the remaining amount will be consider my gross salary that will be the base to pay my taxes

Store operators are saying that without enough quality employees, they can not satisfy the needs of their shoppers on a regular basis, including answering their questions and helping them find the right product for their pets.

By focusing on posing the right questions instead of giving advice, pet store owners and managers can help their employees take responsibility for solving their own motivational problems.

Pet owners are faced with a dizzying array of pet food choices today, so it is more important than ever for pet store employees to be prepared to answer customers» questions about selecting the right food for their pets.

The next step is for the employee to ask a ton of questions in order to be sure that a bird a customer is interested in will be the right one for them.

As NWEI's Executive Director Mike Mercer notes, «This is another great example of a company already doing so much great work in the sustainability realm, now doing more of the right thing when employees ask a question and step forward into the solution.»

There are really two issues that must be considered when asking the provocative question about whether potentially precluding an employee on the basis of an addiction to cigarettes would be a violation of that individual's rights under the Ontario Human Rights Code: (1) is the practice illegal; and (2) if not always, thenrights under the Ontario Human Rights Code: (1) is the practice illegal; and (2) if not always, thenRights Code: (1) is the practice illegal; and (2) if not always, then when?

Wrongful Dismissal 101Without a doubt, the most frequent questions that I get from employee clients are about their rights once they have received a termination...

[2] The question in this appeal is whether a prohibition on designated employees participating in strike action for the purpose of negotiating the terms and conditions of their employment amounts to a substantial interference with their right to a meaningful process of collective bargaining and, as a result, violates s. 2 (d) of the Charter.

There is a separate and distinct possibility, that one of the forms you signed actually signed away your rights (which would moot the question about you benig an employee).

Many questions have been raised by human resources professionals and employers pertaining to the rights of IQT's former employees, IQT's obligations toward these employees.

The article raises the question about whether companies are doing this because of the perception of inevitable civil rights legislation, or because the employees and the culture at large is dictating the change.

A transaction clearly took place where something was sold by Zellers to Target, and the main question was whether what was sold was «a business or part of it» — in this case, there was undoubtedly an enterprise that has been left in a form where earlier collective bargaining rights of the employees had to be preserved

While the Baylor University decision does not answer the question of when and in what circumstances the Board will recognize an employer's right to lawfully require confidentiality in settlement agreements and other agreements that where they would have been found to interfere with employees» Section 7 rights, the tea leaves more than suggest a change in Board law as soon as the Board returns to five members and an appropriate case is before the new majority.

If you have additional concerns or questions related to the ADA or the rights of disabled employees, consult a Philadelphia employment lawyer or refer to the Related Resources links.

In addition, where there are questions surrounding employee status, it is proposed that an individual would have the right to bring a claim to the ET to determine employment status as a preliminary issue.

If you have questions about labour laws or employee and employer rights, just pick up the phone and call Peninsula at 1 -833-245 — 3651.

Although this case focused on employee rights of privacy in the context of a criminal investigation, it raises pertinent questions for employers to consider.

In cases where an employee is dismissed before the arrival of a date that triggers an entitlement to a benefit, such as the date when the employee will have earned the right to a full pension, a question inevitably arises as to whether the severance package offered to the employee should be structured in a way to «bridge» the former employee so that trigger date is achieved.

The question is not whether the contract or plan is ambiguous, but whether the wording of the plan unambiguously alters or removes the [employee's] common law rights.

Echoing the advice usually given to employees in the opposite case of employer repudiation to work on (if at all) under protest to protect their position, Rimer LJ said that the employers here could have expressly reserved their rights until return to work, although as the learned editor of the IRLR points out, quite how that would fit together with dealing sensitively with an employee away on stress - related sick leave might be an interesting question («Do get better, with our support as a caring employer, and then when you get back you are for the high jump»).

Most of the columnists question the value of unions and as well the right of employees to unionize.

The public debate surrounding this case brings to light a myriad of privacy - related issues including the question of employee privacy rights as device users, and how far they extend.

There's an interesting parallel there, in that the employee in question certainly had a legal right to marry outside of her faith (just as a gay TWU student has a legal right to marry a way that is inconsistent with TWU's faith), but the court held that the religious school was equally entitled to exclude her from their community.

The impact on employees consists of the potential loss of privacy; the inconvenience that may result from the CBSA questioning and searching employees suspected of being involved in illegal activities; potential violations of their charter and human rights due to discriminatory action with how suspected employees are selected for searches among others; and possibly other issues.

While you're always within your rights to terminate employees who don't perform to your standards, or to lay off employees when your business can no longer support them, people will be inclined to fight back if they feel they were wrongly fired, raising questions about the legality of the termination process.

The Board answered that question here affirmatively, stating that the «drug and alcohol test, ordered as part of the [employer's] investigation into [the employee's] conduct, triggered [the employee's] right to a Weingarten representative.»

The question of «can an employee «sign away» their human rights?»

A former Facebook employee cited the information from the white paper in a memo to Representative Adam Schiff's office in early March, saying it could help Congress ask the right questions about whether the campaign coordinated with Russia.