Sentences with phrase «employees against any risks»

We wanted to know what are UK organisations doing to protect employees against the risks of being always on?»

Employers are obliged to ensure that they take all reasonable measures to adequately protect their employees against any risks of foreseeable harm.

Not exact matches

Likewise, if business activities pose a risk to employees or customers and reasonably priced insurance is available to protect against such risks, such coverage should be secured.

Social media can also pose a risk, but if your business depends on using it, at the very least make sure geolocation data is turned off in the app (there are online tools that can track a user based on this data) and be careful about oversharing, as sensitive information can be used against executives and employees in social engineering attacks.

Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.

If you utilize any information provided in this site, you do so at your own risk and you specifically waive any right to make any claim against MomTricks.com, its employees or representatives, as the result of the use of such information.

The Rebellion Awakens: Fan Backlash Mounts Against «Star Wars: The Last Jedi» Lil Wayne's Sports Agency Acquires Competing Football Group ADPVoice: Career Development Programs: Investing In Employee Engagement And Retention California Warns About Cell Phone Exposure And Health Risks Why I Would Bet Against Bitcoin Teen Shoppers Are Heading To The Mall This Holiday Season Jeremy Renner Is 2017's Best Actor For The Buck Here Are 7 Words That The Trump Administration Is Reportedly Banning At CDC You Can Buy The Average American Home For 18 Bitcoins Did An Emirates A380 Almost Crash At JFK?

«Lawsuit: Tiffany Pushed Out Employee with Cancer Mutation» (Associated Press) «Lisa O'Rourke alleges in a federal lawsuit that the New York - based company discriminated against her because she carries a gene mutation that put her at high risk for developing cancer, and she was compelled to have surgeries that her lawyer says were life - saving.»

There may be instances when we may disclose your information without providing you with a choice in order to protect the legal rights of Tubi or its affiliates, and each of their respective investors, directors, officers, employees, agents, and suppliers; to protect the safety and security of users of the Tubi Services or to enforce our Terms of Use; to protect against fraud or for risk management purposes; or to comply with or respond to the law or legal process or a request for cooperation by a government entity, whether or not legally required.

This is where schools have to strike the right balance between keeping risks under control «so far as is reasonably practicable» and judging the risk of doing something against the cost of not doing it, while taking into account the health and safety of employees and anyone else affected by a school's actions.

The Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 requires employers to ensure the health and safety of all employees and anyone affected by their work, so far as is reasonably practicable, which means balancing the level of risk against the measures needed to control the risk in terms of money, time or trouble.

Many organizations think of their training as a form of insurance against things like poor employee performance, regulatory fines, and the risk of talented employees leaving their organization.

In addition, it doesn't count against the credit report of you or your employees, so your business performance doesn't risk leaking into your personal finances.

Risk Management and Crisis Response Blog Ignored Employee Turns Key Source in Proceedings Brought Against Former Hedge Fund Bosses

Companies with over 500 employees or an annual turnover in excess of 100 million Euros are expected to implement an appropriate internal ABC risk management framework against which the company and its directors will be held accountable.

Moreover, an employer who dismisses an employee after being told by the employee that he or she suffers from pain, anxiety or depression may be at risk of being found to have discriminated against employee based on «perceived» disability in breach of the Code, even if the employee is unable to prove the existence of an actual disability.

Should the company choose to insure against the risk that its own employees will cause losses, it is free to do so.

Despite finding against the claimant, however, the Court of Appeal took the opportunity to re-affirm the longstanding principle of law that it is the employer, not the employee, who is responsible for devising a safe system of work and that this extends to the giving of specific warnings about risk.

An employer does not have to take steps to guarantee an employee's health and safety against all possible or conceivable risks; it is only required to take reasonable precautions to provide the appropriate level of protection to employees.

A typical attorney who self - identifies as an «employee rights» attorney will usually have much more experience (as compared to the typical attorney identified as an «employment attorney» or an «employer defense» attorney) with: (1) representing workers on a contingency - fee basis (where no fee is paid unless the case wins or settles) and offering risk - sharing fee arrangements generally; (2) playing offense, so to speak — analyzing, identifying and prosecuting specific legal violations (whereas employer - side attorneys tend to have more experience in broader - stroke compliance / employer - training matters, and reactive work in litigation that responds to claims they are presented); and (3) identifying with the «little guy» who has been harmed by a larger opponent, often having well - tested strategies that have worked while representing individuals against large organizations and wind up with good case results.

While some jobs inevitably come with a degree of risk, in the case of asbestos exposure all employees should be provided with the correct protective equipment to guard against industrial diseases.

But this justification is problematic: while there is clearly a risk the employee might have committed previous breaches of contract, can the employer fairly be described as having taken the risk the employee will have committed a serious fraud against them, such that it is reasonable to require the employer to carry out their side of the bargain?

The difficulty, says Mitchell, is there is a real temptation for employers to encourage employees to respond as quickly as possible using mobile devices (even after business hours), but it has to be balanced against the risk that overtime - eligible employees may subsequently make claims for pay for the time spent reviewing and responding to e-mails outside of work.

As part of Rogers Insurance group benefits, we also offer critical illness insurance, which provides further protection for you or your employees against potential health risks.

While you will want to protect your Manhattan business against theft, you face more risk of high - dollar losses caused by damaging disasters such as fires, floods, explosions and employee errors.

Your commercial auto policy is going to cover you and your employees against the specific risks you face in the course of daily business.

COLI was originally purchased on the lives of key employees and executives by a company to hedge against the financial cost of losing key employees to unexpected death, the risk of recruiting and training replacements of necessary or highly trained personnel, or to fund corporate obligations to redeem stock upon the death of an owner.

Group personal accident insurance comes in handy for employers who are constantly in a lookout for ways to safeguard their employees against certain risks that can cause death or permanent disablement.

In a situation where the job profile involves certain risks that can cause injury or causes the death of an employee, this insurance policy works like a shield and protects the employer against heavy expenses incurred due to handling workers» liability.

Group Plans: These covers are meant for businesses, associations or groups of people and helps their employees / members and dependents against risks.

This coverage lets you avoid the risk of facing a liability lawsuit against your company if your employee is responsible for an accident while carrying out business duties.

Employers admit weakness in the face of skills shortages Employers may be insulating themselves against potential risks however, some have left themselves vulnerable in areas such as compensation packages, career path opportunities for employees and a lack of knowledge and expertise when it comes to hiring.

Enforced hospital policy and procedure used to protect assets, employees, patients, and visitors against known and potential risks.