The increase in employees struggling to juggle the competing demands of their employers and those of their families has resulted in an increase in family status discrimination claims, forcing courts and arbitrators to balance the needs of sandwiched
employees against freedom of contract and the needs of employers.
Not exact matches
In a recent sworn deposition for a lawsuit
against the company, Carmen Viramontes, a former
Freedom Fidelity
employee, said Cotroneo and a man named Giang Phan (he went by «Jimmy») co-owned the company.
In 2013 the ECtHR ruled that a British Airways
employee who wished to wear a visible cross around her neck had been indirectly discriminated
against, in violation of her
freedom of religion, due to her employer's ban on the wearing of religious symbols.
In addition to providing good insight into the current state of the law, he makes the argument that it would be good for society, including employers, if they could get over their basically reflexive anti-free speech reactions, while acknowledging there is little current legal basis to require them to do so, and conceding that
freedom increases conflict which runs
against [an] employer's «enduring goals of
employee compliance, conformity, complacency and efficiency.»
The line between religious
freedom and occupational heath and safety can be a blurry one, as evidenced in a recent Quebec Superior Court decision where three Sikh men (the
employees) brought a claim
against their employer who would not allow them to work without hard hats on.
In refusing LAO lawyers the right to collective bargaining, you are shamefully and blatantly discriminating
against women and minorities, while representing an agency that should be dedicated to equality and respecting the rights and
freedoms of its
employees.
All
employees have a number of basic rights including fair compensation, the right to privacy,
freedom from being discriminated
against, etc..