Not exact matches
According to this source, Bell was not an «
at will»
employee, which made firing him outright difficult because it would have been a lengthy process likely involving
arbitration.
Except as expressly provided herein, any claim, dispute or controversy (whether based upon contract; tort, intentional or otherwise; constitution; statute; common law; or equity and whether pre-existing, present or future), including initial claims, counter-claims, cross-claims and thirdparty claims, arising from or relating to (i) the Card; (ii) any service relating to the Card; (iii) the marketing of the Card; (iv) this Cardholder Agreement, including the validity, enforceability, interpretation, scope, or application of the Agreement and this
arbitration provision (except for the prohibition on class or other non-individual claims, which shall be for a court to decide); and (v) any other agreement or instrument relating to the Card or any such service («Claim») shall be decided, upon the election of you or the Bank (or Green Dot Corporation or the Bank's agents,
employees, successors, representatives, affiliated companies, or assigns), by binding
arbitration pursuant to this
arbitration provision and the applicable rules and procedures of the
arbitration administrator in effect
at the time the Claim is filed.
The court noted that while plaintiff's claim fails within the very broad scope of the
arbitration at issue (he was an
employee of the party that signed the contract and he was also a user of the equipment), but the court held persons are not normally bound by an agreement entered into by a corporation when they have an interest or are
employees.
At Connor & Morneau, LLP, we are dedicated to assisting
employees, labor organizations, and consumers protect and defend their rights through negotiation and
arbitration as well as through individual and class action litigation in state and federal courts and administrative agencies.
Since her call, Jennifer has practiced labour and human rights law
at labour
arbitration tribunals for the Ontario Public Service
Employees Union.
Require
employee reinstatement
at the conclusion of a legal strike or lockout and provide access to grievance
arbitration in these circumstances to enforce the obligation
In an
arbitration between the Corporation of Quinte West and CUPE, Local 759, (decision released on October 21, 2011), Arbitrator Paula Knopf considered whether an employer has an obligation to accommodate an
employee who suffers from allergies that are caused,
at least in part, by scented products in the workplace.
The firm's attorneys also prepare employment applications,
employee handbooks, binding
arbitration agreements,
at - will employment agreements, employment contracts, independent contractor agreements and a variety of other agreements.
At grievance
arbitration, the employer argued that the top up provision simply provided all new parents, including pregnant mothers, with a single 15 - week top up, and that this amounted to fair and equal treatment of all its
employees.
Since then,
at least one other prominent law firm has publicly announced that it too «will no longer require any
employees, including associates, to sign any
arbitration agreements.»
Second, the chambers judge had found that if Unifor was ultimately successful in the
arbitration, the impact on the privacy and dignity rights of the
employees could not be remedied; in the absence of the continuance of the injunction the Unifor
employees would suffer irreparable harm from the non-consensual taking of bodily fluids, which is a substantial affront to individuals» privacy, security and bodily integrity (citing Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, Local 707 v. Suncor Energy Inc, 2012 ABCA 373 (CanLII)
at para 5)(Unifor, ABCA 2018
at para 12).
They deal with abuse of process
at arbitration, entitlement of part - time and custodial
employees to miscellaneous leaves, and the balancing of religious freedom with other statutory requirements...
He found that, based on any line of analysis, to order the reinstatement of an
employee who falsely called in sick in order to play baseball, then repeatedly lied to his employer after the fact, and
at arbitration undermined the trust relationship between Telus and the grievor such that it could not be repaired.»