We saw
employees left with nothing but tax burdens even when there is an on - paper - only outcome for the company.
Not exact matches
(There are some state laws that do guarantee maternity and paternity
leave, usually unpaid, for companies
with fewer
employees, but there is
nothing consistent from state to state.)
The way I read it, the opinion had
nothing to do
with the Lobbying Law, but the restrictions on state
employees after
leaving state employment, so your headline mentioning the lobby law doesn't make sense.
I am in financial difficulty because my employer went to Mexico for a better bottom line and
left a 39 year
employee with nothing.
But all of those conversations are
leaving out one key piece of the loyalty puzzle:
Nothing is more memorable for a shopper than when they make a personal connection
with a store's
employee.
It ensures that when any
employee leaves,
nothing else
leaves with them.