Most traditional company policies are designed to impose constraints on
employees under the theory that workers are untrustworthy cogs who will do as little as possible if not carefully managed.
Not exact matches
Republicans are working
under the
theory that public sector
employees who typically vote Democratic turned out in larger than usual numbers for a local election.
Entrants agree to release and hold harmless the Bloggin» Mamas, Heather Lopez Enterprises, LLC, Florida Prepaid, Moore Communications, Twitter, and any other organizations responsible for sponsoring, fulfilling, administering, advertising or promoting this giveaway, and their respective parent, subsidiaries, and affiliates and each of their respective officers, directors, members,
employees, agents and subcontractors (collectively the «Released Parties») from and against any and all claims, expenses, and liability, including but not limited to negligence and damages of any kind to persons and property, including but not limited to invasion of privacy (
under appropriation, intrusion, public disclosure of private facts, false light in the public eye or other legal
theory), defamation, slander, libel, violation of right of publicity, infringement of trademark, copyright or other intellectual property rights, property damage, or death or personal injury arising out of or relating to a participant's entry, creation of an entry or submission of an entry, participation in this giveaway, acceptance or use or misuse of prize.
Under this
theory, an employer may be held liable for the negligent acts of its
employee if the
employee was acting within the scope of his or her employment when the negligent act or omission occurred.
Trucking companies may try to fight liability
under this
theory by arguing that the wrongful act did not occur within the scope of employment or that the driver was an independent contractor rather than an
employee.
Ultimately, the court concluded that since the employer admitted that the
employee was acting within the scope of her employment at the time of the accident, the employer only can be held liable
under the
theory of respondeat superior.
Respondeat Superior:
Under this
theory, an employer may be liable to a victim in a negligence action when their
employee commits a negligent act while acting within the «course and scope» of their employment.
By using this website you agree that neither American Safety Council, Inc. nor its affiliated companies, their officers, directors,
employees, agents, information providers, or suppliers shall have any liability to you
under any
theory of liability or indemnity in connection with your use of this website or the services of American Safety Council, Inc..
By using this website you agree that neither the American Safety Council, nor their affiliated companies, officers, directors,
employees, agents, information providers, or suppliers shall have any liability to you
under any
theory of liability or indemnity in connection with your use of this website or the services of the American Safety Council.
Subject to any non-excludable rights and to the maximum extent permitted
under the law, in no event will Relationships Australia (NSW) Limited and its
employees be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, direct, indirect, punitive, special, consequential damages, lost profits, lost data or business interruption) arising out of the use, inability to use, or the results of use of this Site, any web sites linked to this Site, or the materials or information contained at any or all such sites, whether based on contract, tort, statute, common law, equity or any other legal
theory and whether or not advised of the possibility of such damages.
Unless you've been living
under a rock, you know that command - and - control structures with
Theory X leaders, who think management's job is to use rewards and punishment to direct, motivate, control, and even modify
employees» behavior in order to get organizational results, are on their way out.