Sentences with phrase «employer against a former employee»

The high court will also use an employment - discrimination case from the private sector to clarify whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the main federal job - discrimination law, covers retaliation by employers against former employees as well as job applicants...

Her defense of an employer against a former employee's race discrimination claim led to it being withdrawn.

Rengasamy defended another employer against a former employee's claim of forced resignation.

Successfully opposed an injunction motion brought by an employer against its former employees with respect to alleged breaches of various restrictive covenants.

Not exact matches

Most recently, an anonymous employee aired a slew of grievances against her former employer, ZocDoc, a Yelp - like service for finding doctors, and said she had hired a lawyer to pursue action.

Former Labour minister Alan Johnson - a former union leader - contends that the bill is «spiteful» and designed to «gerrymander votes in favour of the employer and against the employee&rFormer Labour minister Alan Johnson - a former union leader - contends that the bill is «spiteful» and designed to «gerrymander votes in favour of the employer and against the employee&rformer union leader - contends that the bill is «spiteful» and designed to «gerrymander votes in favour of the employer and against the employee».

There are two main types of restrictive covenant clauses in employment agreements: non-solicitation provisions (in which the employee is preventing from soliciting customers or employees of the former employer for a time, but can compete generally) and non-competition clauses (the employee is prohibited from competing against the former employer, usually for a defined period and within a defined geographical area).

However, bad conduct by a former employee, whether by taking confidential information or poaching former customers of the former employer, often will overcome a court's reluctance to enforce a restrictive covenant against a low - level employee.

His experience includes counseling businesses when employees threaten claims against them, file claims with the EEOC against their former employers, or file lawsuits alleging the businesses did not comply with the law.

AXA UK has launched a report that reveals the scale and impact of workplace injury compensation claims on the UK's SMEs, finding that 24 percent of SME owners interviewed have had an employee or former employee make a claim against their Employers» Liability Insurance in the last five years.

The employee brought a wrongful dismissal claim against her former employer, claiming entitlement to reasonable notice at common law.

Almost a quarter (24 percent) of small and medium - sized businesses (SMEs) have had an employee or former employee claim against their Employers» Liability Insurance in the past five years.

Based on the foregoing, the Fourth DCA denied the employer's temporary injunction against the former employee because the employer breached the employment agreement by failing to properly compensate the former employee.

Whether you need an overtime pay attorney in Los Angeles, a wrongful termination lawyer in San Diego, or an employment discrimination lawyer in Southern California, our employment law firm tenaciously takes on current or former employers who engage in unlawful practices against employees.

Actions for breach of contract can be against vendors, clients, employees, former employees, employers, real estate or business partners, or any other entity where a contract exists between a business and another person or entity or between participants in a business.

The woman filed a complaint April 19 in Orange County Circuit Court against her former employer, alleging they failed to provide employees their proper wages, benefits and incentives.

Represented employees in lawsuits against former employers based on employer's refusal to pay past due compensation or to honor obligations under employment agreements and / or severance agreements.

The Mavrick Law Firm also has successfully represented South Florida employers in litigation against former employees who have abused their trust relationship with the employer.

Emily Kysel, a former employee of the Department of Code Enforcement, has filed a suit against her former employer under the Americans with Disabilities Act for having been denied the ability to bring her paprika - sniffing dog to work.

Obtained a $ 365,000 settlement for a former employee who alleged wrongful discharge and retaliatory harassment in a race and sex discrimination case against her former employer and manager.

Obtained a $ 1.4 million verdict (upheld after appeals) for a former employee who alleged wrongful discharge and failure to accommodate in a disability discrimination case against his former employer and manager.

Obtained a $ 500,000 settlement for a former employee who alleged wrongful discharge and breach of contract to pay severance benefits against his former employer.

John has regularly been instructed to prosecute or defend claims in which a former employer seeks to enforce post-contractual restrictions against a former employee.

In most cases, California law does not permit employers to enforce a restrictive covenant against their former employees, particularly when it takes the form of a non-compete agreement.

As part of his practice, Mr. Avraam has represented employers whose employees and former employees have engaged in significant misconduct, including committing fraud against their employers, as well misappropriating the employers confidential information or otherwise breaching their fiduciary duties.

Former employers often file cases against former employees and their new employers alleging breach of non-competition covenants, and the Mavrick Law Firm has successfully defended the new business or new empFormer employers often file cases against former employees and their new employers alleging breach of non-competition covenants, and the Mavrick Law Firm has successfully defended the new business or new empformer employees and their new employers alleging breach of non-competition covenants, and the Mavrick Law Firm has successfully defended the new business or new employer.

However, Florida law recognizes an exception in the context of a former employer who wishes to bring a lawsuit against a new employer for tortious interference with a non-compete contract between the former employer and its employee, even if the employee was terminable at - will.

The takeaway for employees is to understand their legal claim against their former employers and proceed accordingly.

Obtained a settlement on behalf of a former employee against his employer in an Employee Retirement Income Security Actemployee against his employer in an Employee Retirement Income Security ActEmployee Retirement Income Security Act matter.

The duty to «act reasonably», in seeking and accepting alternate employment, can not be a duty to take such steps as will reduce the claim against the defaulting former employer, but must be a duty to take such steps as a reasonable person in the dismissed employee's position would take in his own interests — to maintain his income and his position in his industry, trade or profession.

Represented employer in lawsuit against former employee for unauthorized use of the employer's property.

Under Maine law, an employer has a qualified privilege against a defamation claim by a former employee, meaning as long as the employer is truthful and does not act maliciously, it is immune from liability.

For example, a claim for discrimination in the workplace is not limited to being heard by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the «Tribunal») if the employee also has a wrongful dismissal or tort claim against his or her former employer.

Representation of cookie and cracker manufacturer in trade secrets claim against former employee and his new employer — a competitor of our client.

The typical case involves an employer seeking injunctive relief against a former employee who is alleged to be competing or soliciting customers in violation of the restrictive covenant.

Rosen said that some employers don't bother to verify past employment because they know many organizations have policies against giving out detailed information about current or former employees.