Sentences with phrase «employer goes out of business»

If a former employer goes out of business or merges with another company, it can complicate your access to your funds.

Reparation by equivalence is appropriate where the employer goes out of business either in part or completely (making it impossible for employees to be reinstated).

If you decide to purchase the shares, it's important that they're part of a diversified investment plan to avoid losing a large part of your investment portfolio if your employer goes out of business.

Worse, if your employer went out of business or no longer carries a group health plan, you may not be eligible for COBRA coverage.

Spouses become ill and can not work, employers go out of business, gas prices rise offsetting future pay raises, etc.... again, you get the idea.

Worse, if your employer went out of business or no longer carries a group health plan, you may not be eligible for COBRA coverage.

Not exact matches

Once you know for sure that you're ready to take the leap and go out on your own, sever ties with your employer so you can devote 100 percent of your time to your business.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Together, this UNION and UNION BOSS attempt to tell ALL of the employers in New York State to EITHER [a] accept their Collective Wage Demands — OR --[b] Go Out Of Businesof the employers in New York State to EITHER [a] accept their Collective Wage Demands — OR --[b] Go Out Of BusinesOf Business.

(g) If you are planning to go out of business or your organization will be bought by or merged with another organization, you must immediately notify all employers and offer to transfer all records pertaining to the employer and its employees to the employer or to any other service agent the employer designates.

If your employer does go out of business, your pension might be reduced, but by no more than an amount proportional to whatever shortfall exists in the plan.»

«An employer could go out of business, or lose the records of your employment.

Retirement: Pensions from Former Employers (http://search.pbgc.gov/mp/)-- Search for unclaimed pension money from companies that went out of business or ended a defined plan.

My employer is going out of business...

The judgment in this case, however, went further and found that the right of the employer to carry out their business in a particular way outweighed the right of Ms Achibita to wear her headscarf.

Thousands of workers have developed industrial diseases such as mesothelioma many years after former employers have gone out of business.

More: Eugene Volokh noting that Title VII as long enforced requires employers to accommodate employees» religiously - based requests when the burdens of doing so are small, and that Star Transport — which has since reportedly gone out of business — did not put forth a showing otherwise in this case.

A lawyer in Florida who was put out of business, along with every other real estate lawyer in her city, by a six - month long (that is all it took) campaign of predatory pricing, and who, needing to make a living, then took a job with that industry (but is no longer doing much law), went on to describe the level of service (despite the now four times greater cost than the lawyers ever charged) that her new employer and its non-competitors now deliver to the public as shit (her word).

However, if an employee is injured while returning from company - sponsored education classes, or goes to the restroom, visits the cafeteria, has a coffee break, or steps out of a nonsmoking office to smoke a cigarette, and is injured, workers» compensation boards and courts typically recognize that employers benefit from these «non business» employee conveniences, and often award compensation.

Worse, if your employer went out - of - business, you may not qualify for COBRA at all.

Paper vs. Personal References Many employers won't be interested in written reference letters, though I still think it's a good idea to have some, especially if you're graduating from college, relocating, or the company you work for is going out of business.

On her resume, a mortgage executive mentioned that her last employer «went out of business in 2009.»

I have seen resume cases where the applicants declared they have worked for an employer that had already gone out of business.

Sadly, her employer is going out of business next month so Loretta is looking for a new job in sales.

If a candidate's previous employer has gone out of business or changed ownership, someone at ESR might ask the job seeker to provide a copy of an old W - 2 form or the name of a former supervisor.