Sentences with phrase «employers discriminate against»

If you're in career transition, you've felt it... you know employers discriminate against the unemployed.

This also implies that good English must be used because many employers discriminate against improper use of English in resumes of various types of professions.

Employers discriminate against the unemployed, because work gaps represent risk, including:

This also implies that good English must be used because many employers discriminate against improper use of English in resumes of... Read More»

«Even «diversity - friendly» employers discriminate against racial minority job seekers.»

Yet, if you have been denied a job, a promotion or other work benefit due to an employer discriminating against you for one of the above personal characteristics, you have a legal recourse.

If an employer discriminates against a worker for filing a claim for benefits, they may be subject to a Labor Code Section 1329a) claim.

She claimed that her employer discriminated against her on grounds of physical disability by terminating her employment while she was on medical leave due to a disability.

From time to time, employers will find themselves faced with circumstances where taking steps to avoid discriminating against a customer or client under the Human Rights Code will have the unintended result of the employer discriminating against its employees.

As a result, on March 28, 2013, Flatt launched a grievance alleging that the employer discriminated against her on the grounds of sex and family status when it refused her request to telework from home full - time for a year following the end of her 12 - month maternity leave in March 2013, to breastfeed her child.

Seven months after the termination, the employee launched a lawsuit, alleging that the employer discriminated against him based upon his disability.

Prior decisions such as Entrop, and the Court of Queen's Bench ruling in Kellogg, Brown & Root held that there was a prima facie case of discrimination because the employer discriminated against all drug users on the ground of a» perceived disability».

The Tribunal concluded the employer discriminated against the employee on the basis of family status when it gave top - up benefits for parental leave to adoptive parents but denied them to biological parents, depriving the employee of money and time with his child — and awarded him a paid parental leave with top - up even though the child was no longer an infant.

The employee alleged that she was not simply a transgender person, but that she had gender dysphoria, that she was disabled by this condition, and that the employer discriminated against her based upon this disability.

The petition claimed that the employer discriminated against him based upon his status as a recovered addict, which is a protected class under the LAD.

Ms. Flatt, grieved that her employer discriminated against her on the grounds of sex and family status when it refused her request to telework from home full time, Monday to Friday, for a year following the end of her year - long maternity leave in March 2013.

Last May 2012, an adjudicator upheld a prior Ontario Human Rights Tribunal decision (January 2012) that an employer discriminated against a long - time employee when it was decided to terminate her because she suffered from a disability.

Since the employee could establish a prima facie case of discrimination by proving that a) she had, or was perceived to have, a disability, b) she received adverse treatment, and c) her disability was a factor in the adverse treatment, the employee's allegation that the employer discriminated against her on the basis of disability when they terminated her employment was upheld.

A 2007 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that after looking at only a resume, employers discriminated against women they perceived to be 50 or older.

Tellingly, most of the dads only contributed their first names to the piece, and some asked to be totally anonymous, in case their employers discriminated against them.

And a person trying to find housing after a period of incarceration is unlikely to succeed unless he or she is also able to find employment, a task that may prove difficult due to the common practice of potential employers discriminating against applicants who have criminal records.

Not exact matches

Their research estimates that, along with recent nondiscrimination laws at the state level, the White House ban will prevent employers from discriminating against 14 million LGBT workers.

Pao, for example, a former venture capitalist at well - known Silicon Valley firm Kleiner Perkins, lost a lawsuit last year that she filed against her former employer over allegations that it had discriminated against her because of her gender.

The respondents argued that not only is it fair to the employer who experiences a disruption, but it's also necessary to ensure reservists are not discriminated against when searching for employment.

Prevent employers and insurance companies from discriminating against Canadians on the basis of genetic testing;

This time, the focus is more narrowly on ensuring that people not be forced to agree to potential arbitration as a condition of their employment and that employers be prohibited from «threatening, retaliating or discriminating against, or terminating any applicant for employment or prospective employment or any employee because of the refusal to consent to the waiver of any right, forum, or procedure for a violation of specific statutes governing employment.»

The European Employment Directive only allows employers to discriminate against employees on the basis of religion where there is «a genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirement» (GOR) that the employee shares the faith of the school.

If an employer decides to discriminate against a particular kind of people, so be it.

The government can, however, impose health and safety requirements on all EMPLOYERS — they can require a minimum wage, they can require that female or minority workers are not discriminated against, and so forth.

There are many cultures, people, employers, and laws that actively discriminate against people for not being a member of a particular religion.

EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER The Windsor Court Hotel is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate against associates or job applicants on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin, handicap, veteran status, or any other condition protected by applicable state or federal laws, except where a bona fide occupational qualification EMPLOYER The Windsor Court Hotel is an equal opportunity employer and does not discriminate against associates or job applicants on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin, handicap, veteran status, or any other condition protected by applicable state or federal laws, except where a bona fide occupational qualification employer and does not discriminate against associates or job applicants on the basis of race, religion, color, sex, age, national origin, handicap, veteran status, or any other condition protected by applicable state or federal laws, except where a bona fide occupational qualification applies.

Appropriate actions against discriminating employers should be introduced.

Disclosure of a woman's plan to have children at any time throughout the employment relationship, either during the hiring process or thereafter, could enable the employer to discriminate against her, by either terminating her employment, or treating her differently, both of which could have significantly negative repercussions for the woman.

My goal is for the law to pertain to any «lactating women», so employers can not use the law to discriminate against a bereaved mother whose already experiencing unfathomable grief.

This law also bars an employer from discriminating against an employee exercising this right.

Employers may not suspend, fire, or discriminate against an employee for using these rights.

§ 39-2-215 et seq. specifies that employers must not discriminate against breastfeeding mothers and must encourage and accommodate breastfeeding.

Hawaii: specifically prohibits an employer from denying employment, withholding pay, demoting, or in any other way discriminating against a lactating employee.

The employer may not discriminate against an employee who chooses to express breast milk in the workplace.

I think what would give flight attendants more power to do the right thing in these situations is if their employers provided them with a policy that stated that they will uphold human rights legislation, which includes not discriminating against mothers and babies, and therefore breastfeeding is allowed and mothers are free to breastfeed their babies in the manner that they feel is appropriate.

As NCCL Legal Officer Harriet represented Brenda Clarke in a successful landmark Sex Discrimination Act case against her employer, Ely Kinnock, who had discriminated against women part - timers through a redundancy scheme which made part - timers redundant before full - timers.

In 2013 the ECtHR ruled that a British Airways employee who wished to wear a visible cross around her neck had been indirectly discriminated against, in violation of her freedom of religion, due to her employer's ban on the wearing of religious symbols.

The European Employment Directive only allows employers to discriminate against employees on the basis of religion where there is «a genuine, legitimate and justified occupational requirement» (GOR) that the employee shares the faith of the school.

In papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider context.

In a case that could have wide - ranging national significance for gay rights, a federal appeals court in New York ruled that a landmark civil rights law bars employers from discriminating against their workers based on sexual orientation.

In this role, Justin worked to pass first in the nation legislation that prohibits employers from discriminating against unemployed job applicants.

«The rule of 85 discriminates not only on the grounds of age, but also against women, who are likely to start work for their local government employer later and on a part - time basis,» said local government minister Phil Woolas.

«The Liberal Democrats should be ashamed to be associated with the introduction of measures which give employers licence to exploit, bully and discriminate against their workforce.

The bill prohibits most employers from discriminating against workers based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

The speaker praised Assemblyman Keith Wright's and State Senator Andrea Stewart - Cousin's 2011 bills that would prevent employers from discriminating against unemployed job seekers and said that she would work to duplicate the process in the city.