Sentences with phrase «end crashes all»

Only about 7 percent involved rear - end crashes.

People who are injured in rear - end crashes often need help in understanding their legal rights and recovery options.

This is evident in certain types of accidents, like rear - end crashes, or some kinds of injuries, like soft tissue injuries.

According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, or NHTSA, 40 percent of all car accidents in the United States are classified as rear - end crashes.

The experienced rear end collision team at the offices of GJEL Accident Attorneys can help you to understand laws related to rear end crashes in California, and gather the evidence you need to prove the fault of the other driver and hold that driver liable for your injuries.

Head Injuries — People involved in rear - end crashes may experience concussion or brain injuries, or bruises or cuts on their head.

Rear - end crashes often may involve more than one car.

Even the most minor of rear - end crashes can result in a painful recovery process.

Injuries resulting from rear - end crashes can be serious, including serious neck and back injuries.

Some of the most common causes of rear - end crashes include the following:

Rear - end crashes are among the most common types of car accidents in Charlotte.

According to experts, defective seatbacks in some cars can break or collapse in major accidents, particularly rear - end crashes, causing paralysis or death to the occupants.

Rear - end crashes involving semi trucks, for instance, may lead to loss of life, which may be grounds for a wrongful death lawsuit.

Many of these rear end crashes happen at slow speeds, like in parking lots or school pick - up zones.

In some rear - end crashes, there is a chain reaction involving several cars where one vehicle strikes another in the rear propelling it into a third vehicle.

Knee Injuries and Leg Injuries: These accidents typically occuring in rear - end crashes.

For example, according to a fact sheet from the Mayo Clinic, whiplash is a common injury in auto accidents, particularly in rear - end crashes.

Rear - end crashes are the most frequently reported type of car accident in the country.

Contrary to what some people may think, rear - end crashes have the potential to cause very serious injuries to accident victims, especially if high speeds are involved.

We aggressively represent our clients in car accident cases including every mechanism of injury from head on collisions, side crashes, drunk driving accidents, rear - end crashes to defective manufacture and design cases against auto manufacturers.

Rear - end crashes can do a lot of damage to the body, and sometimes things like whiplash or brain injury don't manifest outward symptoms right away, according to Mayo Clinic and WebMD.

Rear end crashes happen all the time here in Florida.

ARLINGTON, Va. — The designs of head restraints in an increasing number of passenger vehicles are improving so that many occupants are better protected from whiplash injury in rear - end crashes.

Only six of the seat / head restraint combinations in 44 current model SUVs are rated good for protection against whiplash injuries in rear - end crashes.

For a long time, most of the head restraints in passenger vehicles weren't high enough or close enough to the backs of many occupants» heads to provide effective protection against neck injury in rear - end crashes.

A study by a team of researchers from Europe, Australia and New Zealand has found that Low Speed AEB (autonomous emergency braking) technology leads to a 38 % reduction in real - world rear - end crashes.

Some automakers are designing advanced head restraints that position themselves closer to occupants» heads or adjust seat stiffness to control torso movement in rear - end crashes.

Real world claims data suggest that Autonomous Emergency Braking (AEB) systems can reduce rear - end crashes by one quarter or more and lead to a significant reduction of injuries.

Now some new designs of seats and head restraints are reducing neck injuries among car occupants involved in rear - end crashes.

Rear - end crashes usually aren't fatal but result in a large proportion of crash injuries.

This means it won't begin to provide adequate protection for many taller people in rear - end crashes.

Previous studies have predicted significant expected benefits of AEB technology in low speed rear - end crashes but, so far, there has been little evidence that they really work.

You're more likely to need the protection of a good head restraint in a collision than the other safety devices in your vehicle because rear - end crashes are so common.»

Seats without good or acceptable geometry are rated poor overall because they can not be positioned to protect many people in rear - end crashes.

The designs of head restraints in an increasing number of passenger vehicles are improving so that many occupants are better protected from whiplash injury in rear - end crashes.

If all vehicles had been equipped with autobrake that worked as well as the systems studied, there would have been at least 700,000 fewer police - reported rear - end crashes in 2013.

Good head restraint geometry doesn't guarantee good occupant protection in rear - end crashes, but it's an important first step.

«As this technology becomes more widespread, we can expect to see noticeably fewer rear - end crashes.

Lane departure warning was packaged with front crash prevention on the Hondas, Subarus and some Volvos included in the study, but it is unlikely to have affected rear - end crashes.

The analyses show that forward collision warning alone reduces rear - end crashes by 23 percent, while forward collision warning with autobrake reduces them by 39 percent.

Only rear - end crashes in which the study and comparison models struck other vehicles were considered.

If all vehicles had been equipped with autobrake, there would have been at least 700,000 fewer police - reported rear - end crashes in 2013.

Conequence: If the active headrests do not deploy in certain rear - end crashes, the front seat occupants have an increased risk of injury.

The technology is significantly reducing rear - end crashes in passenger vehicles (see «Crashes avoided: Front crash prevention slashes police - reported rear - end crashes,» Jan. 28, 2016).

In rear - end crashes, occupants» heads can snap back to produce neck or cervical sprain injury - whiplash as it's more commonly known.

Researchers at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute have estimated that collision mitigation braking could reduce fatalities in rear - end crashes by 44 percent and injuries by 47 percent if all tractor - semitrailers were equipped with the technology.

«ATA strongly believes that preventing rear - end crashes is a far better strategic goal than mitigating them and strongly recommends that all vehicles (light and heavy) be equipped with forward collision warning and mitigation braking technology,» the group said in comments to NHTSA on a proposal to strengthen truck underride guards.

The agency «agrees with the petitioners that [these] systems have the potential to save lives by preventing or reducing the severity of rear - end crashes.»

The researchers identified 2,641 property damage liability claims for rear - end crashes of the cars included in the study — Taurus and Sable models with and without improved restraint geometry, Volvo S70s with and without WHIPS, Toyota and Lexus models with and without the WIL system, plus a number of Buick, Nissan, Pontiac, and Saab models with and without active head restraints.

Volvo and Toyota focused on seatbacks, designing them to yield in rear - end crashes to reduce the forward acceleration of occupants» torsos.