To what extent can the court limit the government's freedom to make political choices as to how it should spend that budget, and insist that, in an era of rising fuel prices, it must expend the huge sums it would deem necessary to
end fuel poverty?
This is not a strategy to
end fuel poverty.
Exclusive: Figure rises from a fifth of homes last year, meaning coalition will fail to meet its legal duty to
end fuel poverty by 2016
«We need a comprehensive strategy for a nationwide refit of the UK's cold and draughty homes to tackle climate change and
end fuel poverty - starting by ensuring that rented homes meet a basic standard of heating and insulation.
The Strategy had also adopted an interim target to
end fuel poverty for all vulnerable households in England by 2010 which was missed.
The government's fuel poverty strategy is «going in the wrong direction» and will not succeed in
ending fuel poverty by 2016, specialists have warned.
Not exact matches
As temperatures plummet,
fuel poverty charity NEA is urging the Government to step back from
ending insulation and heating grants for vulnerable people struggling to afford their energy bills.
The Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000, supported by the UK
Fuel Poverty Strategy 2001, requires the Government to seek to end to fuel poverty for all households in England by 2
Fuel Poverty Strategy 2001, requires the Government to seek to end to fuel poverty for all households in England b
Poverty Strategy 2001, requires the Government to seek to
end to
fuel poverty for all households in England by 2
fuel poverty for all households in England b
poverty for all households in England by 2016.
The Government needs to step up action that will
end these shameful statistics and comprehensively tackle
fuel poverty in the UK.
«Today the Government has recognised that a higher energy efficiency housing standard (Energy Performance Standard Band C) is essential to
ending the preventable suffering caused by
fuel poverty and have set out a legislative framework and strategy to achieve this.
Ron Campbell, Chief Policy and Research Analyst for National Energy Action said: «The original UK
Fuel Poverty Strategy was described as «representing the start of the road to the end of fuel poverty in the United Kingdom», there is a consensus that in order to make meaningful progress in the right direction we are in urgent need of a «road map&raq
Fuel Poverty Strategy was described as «representing the start of the road to the end of fuel poverty in the United Kingdom», there is a consensus that in order to make meaningful progress in the right direction we are in urgent need of a «road map&
Poverty Strategy was described as «representing the start of the road to the
end of
fuel poverty in the United Kingdom», there is a consensus that in order to make meaningful progress in the right direction we are in urgent need of a «road map&raq
fuel poverty in the United Kingdom», there is a consensus that in order to make meaningful progress in the right direction we are in urgent need of a «road map&
poverty in the United Kingdom», there is a consensus that in order to make meaningful progress in the right direction we are in urgent need of a «road map».
The passage of the Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000, supported by the UK
Fuel Poverty Strategy 2001, requires the Government to seek to end to fuel poverty for all households by 2016 (2018 in Wal
Fuel Poverty Strategy 2001, requires the Government to seek to end to fuel poverty for all households by 2016 (2018 in
Poverty Strategy 2001, requires the Government to seek to
end to
fuel poverty for all households by 2016 (2018 in Wal
fuel poverty for all households by 2016 (2018 in
poverty for all households by 2016 (2018 in Wales).
Emerging economies like Saudi Arabia and China, the world's top emitter, want rich countries to commit to doing more to cut greenhouse gas output while allowing poorer nations to burn more fossil
fuels to build their economies and
end poverty.
His goal, mirroring the playbook of the Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow, seems to be to sideline environmental concerns by arguing that you're either for fossil
fuels and
ending energy
poverty or for limiting risks of (and from) human - driven climate change and impoverishing humanity.
Point five addresses bringing people out of
poverty and calls for putting «an
end to the fossil
fuel era, phasing out fossil
fuel emissions, including emissions from military aviation and shipping and providing affordable, reliable and safe renewable energy access for all.»
Lomborg claims the often - repeated talking point that «Policies aimed at addressing climate change can easily
end up punishing the poor,» pointing a finger at Germany and citing a study by the fossil -
fuel - funded Institute for Energy Research (IER), claiming that renewable energy targets and emissions caps have resulted in «energy
poverty.»
Kim defended World Bank policies that permit investments in fossil
fuels in developing nations in rare cases, saying it was often for power plants to supply electricity vital to help
end poverty.
That isn't to say that increasing energy access wouldn't improve infant mortality rates — so the two issues aren't mutually exclusive, but as always, the simplistic reductionism so often seen in these threads of fossil
fuels = long life and an
end to
poverty and the associated alternative energy = billions dying and starving is, well, simplistic reductionism.
on the Government to develop a far more effective and comprehensive programme of domestic energy efficiency to simultaneously
end suffering from
fuel poverty and tackle climate change.
The government's strategy under WHECA 2000, which was published in a revised version in December 2002, states that: «In England, the government as far as reasonably practicable will seek an
end to
fuel poverty for vulnerable households by 2010.
The language of the strategy is aspirational: the government will «seek» an
end to
fuel poverty with certain (very ambitious) «targets» in mind.