Sentences with phrase «end it at a point where»

In the majority of the novel, while more difficult topics (i.e. rape) clearly took place, scenes ended at a point where the reader had no doubt what would happen but was not left with detailed descriptions.

Mealtimes end at the point where baby stops eating — there is no encouragement to continue eating past this point.

In the following routines all sets should end at the point where no additional reps can be completed.

While Cardinals features some very solid performance from the cast, particularly Sheila McCarthy, the story chooses to end at a point where there is no real sense of closure, which brought my opinion of the film down a notch.

Metal Gear Solid V is a game destined to fail at bringing the series full circle, so why not end it at a point where the story at least feels complete in a literary sense?

is a game destined to fail at bringing the series full circle, so why not end it at a point where the story at least feels complete in a literary sense?

I've seen resumes that start to build up to a narrative and then end it at a point where I think «did you do anything?

Not exact matches

What was the dynamic with Dell at that point, and where did you end up?

Then, Baxter will pick up the widget in the fingerlike grippers at the end of one of its arms, at which point I will guide Baxter's arm to where I want it to place the widget.

In the end this shrinks the economy — and that means that more and more loans will go bad, until crisis levels are reached at the point where lenders realize that there is no more room to extract more, and stop lending.

To paraphrase Charles Baudelaire's quip that the devil wins at the point where the public comes to believe that he doesn't exist, the financial sector's lobbying effort wins at the point where people believe that running into debt contributes to economic growth rather than burdens it, and that they will end up richer by acting as bank customers.

I too started from nothing, and now I am at the point where we can see the light at the end of the tunnel.

That's — we didn't sell much in last year because we had way too much Session and were — we expect that to be well in EMEA, in particular, where we see — as Nick had mentioned in his remarks, we see more competition at the lower end of the price point range versus the upper end.

@Chuckles «For my first point, I would like to ask, where exactly does the bible say at the beginning or end that it is all true and gives it's bonafides like a good non-fiction story should?

A close friend I had growing up constantly ridiculed my religion (I was a practicing Catholic at the time) to the point where the friendship ended.

For my first point, I would like to ask, where exactly does the bible say at the beginning or end that it is all true and gives it's bonafides like a good non-fiction story should?

But at the end of the story — or at least at the point of the story where I am right now, who can say if this is the end?

They stand on the premise that once God returns then wherever your status is at that point deems where you are going to end up and you will not be given any further chances.

All of us have had a moment at some point in our lives where our body meets the end of ourselves.

The end of the first period may be fixed at the point where expansion was checked (temporarily) by the repressive action of the Roman government under Nero in the winter of A.D. 64/5.

The apologetics of a vengeful, wrathful Hitler or a Hitler that allows terrible things are exhausting and at the end there are few points where I really just don't get it or how it fits into the overall picture of a loving Hitler.

The apologetics of a vengeful, wrathful God or a God that allows terrible things are exhausting and at the end there are few points where I really just don't get it or how it fits into the overall picture of a loving God.

Though it is not humanly possible to draw absolute lines at the point where our «can not» ends and «can» begins, sin is a persistent reality.

Is it not conceivable that Mankind, at the end of its totalization, its folding - in upon itself, may reach a critical level of maturity where, leaving Earth and stars to lapse slowly back into the dwindling mass of primordial energy, it will detach itself from this planet and join the one true, irreversible essence of things, the Omega point?

It is very much to be desired that aesthetics would for once essay to begin at the point where for so many years it has ended, with the illusory magnanimity.

I am increasingly convinced of the value of placing oneself at the lower end of a master - apprentice relationship in fields where one knows next to nothing, where who one is and what one knows in one's own field are unrevealed and beside the point.

Where law and religion clashed, then the Jew was to honor his religious duty at whatever cost, encouraged, it may be, by the belief that this course would prove in the end wisest even from the practical point of view.

I also wondered about this — particularly at the point where, having planned poorly, I only noticed it in the list at the end of doing the steps.

At some point, everyone has visited a grocery or convenience store where the clerk behind the counter barely makes eye contact and doesn't even read out the total bill at the end of the transactioAt some point, everyone has visited a grocery or convenience store where the clerk behind the counter barely makes eye contact and doesn't even read out the total bill at the end of the transactioat the end of the transaction.

The whole point of self - denial during Lent is to celebrate your resolve with a massive blow - out at the end, which is where the Easter eggs fit in.

But in the end, even in a day where we were not at our best we managed to get the result and in the end, you know, when you're losing with a few minutes to go and you equalise, you obviously have to be happy with the point.»

Arsenal fans will obviously hoping that this is where the coincidence ends as well, because the Gunners got off to the worst possible start last year by losing at home to Liverpool (and when you consider they pipped us to the final Champions League spot by a single point that loss looks even worse).

«You look at the table and realise they [Bournemouth] are behind in terms of points but there are so many games where they could have got points, and they could have even won the game but they end up losing by not having a bit of luck or quality.

Lets run Manu at the point because he had 0 pts, 0 from 6 shooting or Bertans 5 pts in 20nd mins or Anderson 5 pts in 17 mins, all these guys over 6» 5 and taller that can't score we should break 60 by the end of the game Two of your Munchkins score 30 pts at around 50 % shooting, let Murray run the point sorry he is no where near ready and to be honest I don't think he has what it takes to be the future PG, the only thing I could agree with you is not playing the 3 together (Mills, Parker, Forbes) and giving White some minutes

Who knows... Could click and given that watford are a below average EPL team we could run away with it... Or the opposite... But that's the point we are simply a mid table outfit where any result is possible... That's wenger's legacy and why he needs to go preferably now but for sure at end of season...

Pirelli has gone a bit too conservative with the compounds this year to the point where teams massively prefer those at the softer end of the spectrum, even at tough circuits like Barcelona and Silverstone.

They can get baskets from multiple guys at multiple positions on the floor and are becoming very difficult to contain but their true improvement is on the Defense end where they are allowing just 61.2 points against (3rd best in the League).

but at this point, one has to wonder if it doesn't end up being a Manning scenario where he loses a bit of arm talent and is never quite the same

Arsenal therefore needs to get as many points as possible from the king makers of the season, because such games will decide where the title ends at come May 2016.

You can see better from the end zone shot how wide open Collie was at the point where the ball (red circle) is flying over his head.

I figure the game is to genuinely take it all in, at some point arrive at a more informed view, stay away from hating people that didn't land on your end or do it your way, and keep an interest in where other people are coming from if you're still bothering to communicate with them.

With the surprise result we've seen today at Anfield where Swansea City wreak a havoc there today's afternoon against Liverpool to record the most against the form book away win there and ran away with all the three points at stake in the game, and also with the Stoke City attempts to end Man Utd 8 match unbeaten run in all matches but for Wayne Rooney's audacious last gap free kick equaliser that save Utd from bluses.

Well... i say we should just take it one step / game at a time and not get ahead of ourselves yet, all we have to do is focus on our own games and other clubs, we need to keep winning matches and at our tough away matches where we can't win or play very well like the Man Utd game, i say we take a point and we will see what happens at the end of the season, COYG

I like to point at the Nasri transfer as the transfer Wenger done after Dein had left and before Gazidis is hired, the one where Nasri signed a new deal with Marseille in May amongst transfer rumors which had ended a lot of them then he signs for AFC in July, less than 1 and a half months.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

I do want him out, not now obviously but at the end of the season, provided that we are again where we all assume we are going to be, which is somewhere between 8 to 15 points off the pace.

Or it could be the other way around, where we start really good, then slump at the end and miss on the title by 7 — 10 points.

Since losing his seat at Haas at the end of last year Gutierrez has shifted his focus to Formula E, where he has not only forgotten how to finish 11th but has remembered how to score points (something that wouldn't be a problem in IndyCar).

Of course the whole point of this is to get the championship to a point where it can start at the end of the year and finish at Le Mans, something series boss Gerard Neveu says is a no - brainer.

Is next season going to be yet another carbon copy where the Arsenal fall apart at some point and we end up chasing 4yh and perhaps a cup?