Sentences with phrase «end of the intervention»

Children were graded at the beginning and end of the intervention period using a tool called the Test of Playfulness (ToP), which was designed by the investigators prior to the study to measure children's willingness to share, engage with their peers, and adapt to verbal and non-verbal social cues.

At the end of the intervention, the education and exposure groups increased their fruit intake.

Five patients in the intervention group (1.4 percent) experienced serious adverse cardiac events within 24 hours of the end of the intervention period compared with none in the usual care group.

The researchers took blood samples at the start of the study and the end of each intervention to test lipid, cholesterol, and glucose levels as well as other cardiovascular measures.

Door - to - needle times for tPA administration of 60 minutes or less increased from 26.5 percent to 41.3 percent (and from 29.6 percent to 53.3 percent at the end of each intervention period).

This took place with the aid of a standardized questionnaire (on the basis of a Social Responsiveness Scale — SRS), in which 65 behaviour patterns were evaluated by the parents before the start of group therapy, at the end of the intervention as well as three months after the end of the intervention in order to measure stability.

Both groups — one which included adults with MCI and the other with healthy brain function — improved their cardiovascular fitness by about ten percent at the end of the intervention.

One year after the end of the intervention, 36 months after the productive asset transfer, 8 out of 10 indices still showed statistically significant gains, and there was very little or no decline in the impact of the program on the key variables (consumption, household assets, and food security).

We conducted a baseline survey on all eligible participants, as well as an endline at the end of the intervention (typically 24 months after the start of the intervention) and a second endline 1 year after the first endline.

At the end of the intervention, we found statistically significant impacts on all 10 key outcomes or indices.

At the end of the intervention the rowers were 4.3 seconds faster than the placebo group in a 2,000 - meter race lasting over 6 minutes (22).

By the end of the intervention, participants lost ~ 5 % of their body weight; > 80 % of it was fat mass, likely due to the relatively high level of dietary protein (~ 150 grams).

At the end of each intervention, participants were subjected to a «meal tolerance test.»

The mean changes in weight from the end of run - in to the end of intervention were -0.1 kg, -0.3 kg, and -0.4 kg in the control, fruits - and - vegetables, and combination groups, respectively.

Moreover, when we compare students around the cutoff at the tracking schools with students of similar ability at the nontracking schools, we find that students at the tracking schools score higher at the end of the intervention than the comparable students in the nontracking schools.

A pre and post assessment is filled in by the class teacher at the beginning and end of the intervention.

Findings The at - risk students who received Reading Recovery in the first half of the year performed significantly better at the end of their intervention period than at - risk students assigned to receive intervention services later in the year.

In a study by Lyubomirsky, Dickerhoof, Boehm, and Sheldon (2011) it was found that compared to their non-motivated counterparts, motivated participants reported improved overall wellbeing and fewer depressive symptoms at the end of the intervention.

Sessions included eight biweekly or fortnightly calls, and two monthly weekly calls towards the end of the intervention to promote maintenance of behaviour change.

Outcomes were measured by the level or severity of depressive symptoms or the incidence of disease remission at the end of the intervention.

Follow - up assessments took place a mean of 3 mo after the end of the intervention, and the interval between pretesting and posttesting averaged 8 mo..

Women on the wait list were offered treatment at the end of the intervention period.

Differences in classroom practices and child outcomes between the two groups were analyzed at the end of the intervention year to assess the added value of FOL over and above standard preschool practice.

At the end of the intervention, when the children were at 36 months, attachment was assessed again.

At the end of the intervention, when the children were at 24 months, the measures used at baseline were re-administered.

At the end of the intervention (infant age = 24 month), attachment security scores derived from Waters» Attachment Q - Sort were in the predicted direction and showed a medium effect size, but did not reach criteria of statistical significance.

Differences between the two groups were analyzed at the end of the intervention year and the following year to assess the added value of FOL over and above standard practice in preschool classrooms.

Results indicated indicate that the Coping Power Program had effects through the 3 years after the end of intervention on reductions in children's aggressive behavior and academic behavior problems, children's expectations that aggression would lead to positive outcomes, and parents» lack of supportiveness with their children.

Results indicate that both intervention groups reported significantly decreased child problem behaviors, dysfunctional parenting, parental depression, and parental stress at the end of the intervention as compared to the control group.

Results indicate participants in the 1 -2-3 Magic group reported significantly less problem behaviors for their children, and significantly less dysfunctional parenting, at the end of the intervention when compared to the control group.

Another program may believe home visits are appropriate because effective changes in a parent's behavior toward one child can benefit other children in the family and persist through later years after the end of the intervention program.

Both the treatment and control groups completed these three measures again at the end of the intervention.

At the end of the intervention, mothers again completed the CBCL / 6 -18.

The primary outcome is the sustained attention test from the CANTAB: «Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP) probability of hit,» assessed at the end of the intervention.

At the end of intervention, playground observations showed that treated children displayed less negative social behavior than controls.