Sentences with phrase «end property costs»

Since a night at a top end property costs 22K Hyatt points, the 50K point bonus for the Ink Bold / Plus cards, for example, will yield you more than enough points for two more free nights.

Not exact matches

That's because those who make decisions on the front end (buying property, building bridges) do not bear all the costs when things go wrong on the back end,» he wrote in an email.

Likely I'll end up paying off the remainder of my two mortgages, which will give me a pretty decent passive income from the single income property, and reduce my living costs

In the end, the lender paid me $ 12k at closing which covered all my transaction costs including funding my escrow for property taxes, insurance and paid the real estate transfer taxes.

Mr Gregg said it was not yet clear whether a tenant receiving full housing benefit housed in an 80 % property would simply end up costing more to the taxpayer.

In particular, he singled out the high cost property taxes and the main cost - driver, public employee pensions, taking issue with DiNapoli's office pointing to a record - high return for the fund at the end of the 2013 - 14 fiscal year.

«If disabled people downsize and need their new property to be adapted, this will end up costing the government more money.

The end result would completely eliminate Medicaid costs from county budgets, providing municipal governments with the flexibility to substantially reduce local property taxes.

The move is intended to make preserving high - cost properties on the East End and in other high - priced areas of the state more attractive to builders.

He also wants the state to enact a single - payer universal healthcare system, which would lower over health care costs by more than $ 50 billion annually while ending the need for counties to use the property tax to pay for Medicaid.

If we can reduce a fraction of the annual chargebacks that end up on our property tax bills, the $ 7.5 million cost to the county would be money well spent, especially for taxpayers in Grand Island and the Tonawandas who bear the lion's share of the chargeback burden.

More recently, the group sent out glossy mailings to voters in a number of Connecticut legislative districts «thanking them» for their pro-charter school vote — a vote that will actually end up costing state and local property taxpayers even more money.

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses, the risk that the transactions with Microsoft and Pearson do not achieve the expected benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion contemplated by the relationship with Microsoft, including that it is not successful or is delayed, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Microsoft and Pearson commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the effect of the proposed separation of NOOK Media, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, possible disruptions in Barnes & Noble's computer systems, telephone systems or supply chain, possible risks associated with data privacy, information security and intellectual property, possible work stoppages or increases in labor costs, possible increases in shipping rates or interruptions in shipping service, effects of competition, possible risks that inventory in channels of distribution may be larger than able to be sold, possible risks associated with changes in the strategic direction of the device business, including possible reduction in sales of content, accessories and other merchandise and other adverse financial impacts, possible risk that component parts will be rendered obsolete or otherwise not be able to be effectively utilized in devices to be sold, possible risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, possible risk that returns from consumers or channels of distribution may be greater than estimated, the risk that digital sales growth is less than expectations and the risk that it does not exceed the rate of investment spend, higher - than - anticipated store closing or relocation costs, higher interest rates, the performance of Barnes & Noble's online, digital and other initiatives, the success of Barnes & Noble's strategic investments, unanticipated increases in merchandise, component or occupancy costs, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, product and component shortages, risks associated with the commercial agreement with Samsung, the potential adverse impact on the Company's businesses resulting from the Company's prior reviews of strategic alternatives and the potential separation of the Company's businesses (including with respect to the timing of the completion thereof), the risk that the transactions with Pearson and Samsung do not achieve the expected benefits for the parties or impose costs on the Company in excess of what the Company anticipates, including the risk that NOOK Media's applications are not commercially successful or that the expected distribution of those applications is not achieved, risks associated with the international expansion previously undertaken, including any risks associated with a reduction of international operations following termination of the Microsoft commercial agreement, the risk that NOOK Media is not able to perform its obligations under the Pearson and Samsung commercial agreements and the consequences thereof, the risks associated with the termination of Microsoft commercial agreement, including potential customer losses, risks associated with the restatement contained in, the delayed filing of, and the material weakness in internal controls described in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2013, risks associated with the SEC investigation disclosed in the quarterly report on Form 10 - Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 26, 2013, risks associated with the ongoing efforts to rationalize the NOOK business and the expected costs and benefits of such efforts and associated risks and other factors which may be outside of Barnes & Noble's control, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended May 3, 2014, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

Such statements reflect the current views of Barnes & Noble with respect to future events, the outcome of which is subject to certain risks, including, among others, the general economic environment and consumer spending patterns, decreased consumer demand for Barnes & Noble's products, low growth or declining sales and net income due to various factors, including store closings, higher - than - anticipated or increasing costs, including with respect to store closings, relocation, occupancy (including in connection with lease renewals) and labor costs, the effects of competition, the risk of insufficient access to financing to implement future business initiatives, risks associated with data privacy and information security, risks associated with Barnes & Noble's supply chain, including possible delays and disruptions and increases in shipping rates, various risks associated with the digital business, including the possible loss of customers, declines in digital content sales, risks and costs associated with ongoing efforts to rationalize the digital business and the digital business not being able to perform its obligations under the Samsung commercial agreement and the consequences thereof, the risk that financial and operational forecasts and projections are not achieved, the performance of Barnes & Noble's initiatives including but not limited to its new store concept and e-commerce initiatives, unanticipated adverse litigation results or effects, potential infringement of Barnes & Noble's intellectual property by third parties or by Barnes & Noble of the intellectual property of third parties, and other factors, including those factors discussed in detail in Item 1A, «Risk Factors,» in Barnes & Noble's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2016, and in Barnes & Noble's other filings made hereafter from time to time with the SEC.

For home equity loans and lines of credit (1) Maximum loan amount depends on home value and total loans secured by home (2) Property insurance required (3) Consult your tax advisor about tax deductibility (4) Closing costs are $ 149 for home equity loans and home equity lines of credit plus cost of appraisal, if needed, and can range from $ 400 to $ 700 (5) No annual fee for qualified credit (6) For balloon products, balance might not be paid in full by end of term.

The annual cost of insuring a property in Jersey City averages $ 1,490 — 17 % above the state mean, putting it on the higher end of home insurance costs.

Finally, he would end up paying Rs. 42 lakhs on a property he eyed for Rs. 20 lakhs which is two times the cost of the property.

If, however, you kept the property for 10 years you would end up with the following (not including maintenance and utility costs):

Low - end Hilton properties cost as little as 30,000 points per night, but higher end properties can run 80,000 points per night or more.

The typical breadwinner will spend between 10 % and 30 % of their gross salary (which can represent as much as 50 % of their take - home pay at the high end) on various housing - related costs, either rent and utilities for an apartment, or mortgage P&I, insurance, property taxes, utilities, HOA dues, home maintenance costs, etc for a condo, townhome or SFD.

Cash flow is the rent money left over at the end of each month after the property's mortgage, taxes, maintenance, insurance and property management costs are paid.

However, if this has happened with my first three investments then this means Peer Street is taking on loans that are too risky and it will end up being expensive for them to pay legal fees and costs to take over and sell properties.

If for some reason you end up unable to make your mortgage payments, the lender will have to foreclose upon your home, then sell the property to recoup its costs.

Contrast that to some other Hilton properties at the top end of the award chart that cost 95,000 points per night, and you can see how Egypt is a huge value on points.

Top - tier Hyatt Properties cost 30,000 points / night so, if you were to buy enough points in this promotion to book such a property, the award night would end up costing you approximately $ 554.

It's not a coincidence that the maximum number of points you can end up with in this promotion is 70,000 as that's exactly what a top Club Carlson property will cost... and I definitely think there's value to be had here given the right conditions.

With the points offer you can squeeze out more stays at lower end properties, but with the 2 free nights offer you get to experience higher end properties that would otherwise cost a fortune.

Although award nights at higher - end properties can cost as many as 35,000 points, Starwood has many luxury properties where you can redeem 10,000 points or less for an award night.

Low - end Hilton properties cost as little as 30,000 points per night, but higher end properties can run 80,000 points per night or more.

Due to the high cost of developing games, you generally only see famous developers or famous properties go for full funding with their initial crowdfunding goal (although sometimes new unknown games end up greatly exceed their initial goal to the point where funding could conceivably cover all costs).

«Wildfire occurrence statewide could increase several folds by the end of the century, increasing fire suppression and emergency response costs and damage to property.»

You can compile information which can include the following: a review of the lease provisions; violations of the rental agreement; the amount of unpaid rent; the number of days that the tenant has stayed in the rental property beyond the end of the lease; receipts regarding clean - up costs of the rental property; the amount of damage to the rental property; a list of photographs of the damages; estimates concerning the repair of the damages; a list of witnesses who have knowledge of an incident that is cause for eviction; and a list of written statements or recorded statements from potential witnesses.

In the end, the principles by which Brown is guided in ultimately exercising his discretion to discharge a certificate of pending litigation to allow the moving party defendant to finance or sell a property in order to raise future legal defence costs — «fair; fast; cost - effective; finality» — are the same principles that are shared, or should be shared, by proponents of ADR and the judiciary.

The application judge made brief reference at the tail end of his reasons to the fact that, while the $ 407,582 that had to be paid under the Cost Sharing Agreement was approximately 10.3 % of the $ 3,960,000 sale price, there was no evidence as to the percentage that the $ 407,582 represented in terms of the profit the appellant would make on the sale of the property.

The annual cost of insuring a property in Jersey City averages $ 1,490 — 17 % above the state mean, putting it on the higher end of home insurance costs.

For example, a higher - end policy with $ 100,000 in property coverage and a $ 500 deductible and $ 100,000 in liability, costs on average, $ 402 a year.

Not only is it against the law in Connecticut to drive without Wallingford automobile insurance, but it is also dangerous, irresponsible and could end up costing you several thousands of dollars in medical and property damage expenses.

Replacement cost will end up giving you more money, because it covers the cost to purchase new property at market value.

In the end, it's common for Jones to net 1 percent to 1.5 percent after MLS fees, marketing costs, and property maintenance, which may or may not be fully reimbursed by the lender.

I have sold properties for the past 10 years with a very good success rate and at the end of the transaction I am told many times, that my skills and representation was well worth the cost of doing business, by both buyers and sellers.

Cash on cash return is calculated on our end by the out of pocket cost of purchase and rehab and normal monthly bills for the property such as utilities and such.

At the end of year 3, if you decide to keep the property, you've made $ 45k all together, if you sell the property, let's conservatively assume 10 % of the price ($ 25k) for transaction costs.

The key here is how much more the lower end properties will cost you in repair, vacancy, turnover, and rent - ready expenses.

If I had insurance I could have the property fixed for only the cost of my deductible and on the other hand if the property were a total loss from the fire I could receive replacement cost on it and come out pretty far ahead in the end.

Since we are coming up on our year's end with the FHA property, we technically could move out of that house and into another, with another FHA loan at 3.5 % down (so very little out of pocket costs).

Being able to hoist a camera up on a drone, or unmanned aerial vehicle, has the potential to be a cost - effective way to get dramatic shots of listed property, particularly for large, high - end homes or big expanses of land.

Madder says Realtors regret the rise in provincial education property tax and the suspension of the Graduate Retention Program — First Home Plan, and recognize that ending PST exemption on construction labour will increase costs in new housing.

In some cases, the company can offer retailers access to high - end customers at a fraction of the property costs.

At the end of the day for the tenant it's a business decision.If they had to rent this same property per month what would it cost??