Sentences with phrase «end systems if»

Not exact matches

The Australian Securities Exchange — ASX — will decide by the end of this year if it will replace its post-trade clearing and settlement system with a blockchain version.

SPIN posited that, based on Spotify's publicly announced royalty rates of artists getting paid $ 0.006 and $ 0.0084 per single stream, that he'd need 287,176,547 streams of his 2002 hit single «Hot in Herre» if he's lucky enough to be on the high end of the payout system.

«If you start with the robot and add cleaning systems to it, you'll always end up compromising.»

By the end of 2015, it finally looked as if both had succeeded: The new Apple TV supports the Apple App Store, and Microsoft updated the Xbox One to run a version of the Windows 10 operating system.

But if you're worried about systems, schemes and streamlined management frameworks but haven't yet nailed down whether you're headed in the right direction, you could end up like someone rushing frantically to an appointment only to realize when they come to the door that they've gone to entirely the wrong location.

If the stress tests show problems in the banking system, it will be harder for Greece to end the program in the way it wants.

The $ 136,000 car was tricked out with just about every technological addition on the market today: a rear - view camera (including night vision), electric rear and side shades, satellite radio, active blind spot detection, a steering wheel that rumbles if you change lanes without signalling, a touch - knob - controlled heads - up - display with GPS and a high - end Bang & Olufson sound system complete with dashboard - mounted tweeter.

And the system set up to pay for rides — a unique municipal subsidy that covers 20 % of any ride that begins and ends in the city, 25 % if it begins or ends at the local light rail station — has already gotten others cities in the surrounding Seminole County interested in replicating it, even though it just started running yesterday.

Diachenko confirmed that an authentication system now protects the database he found at the end of March, albeit there is no way of telling if anyone except the Kromtech team discovered the same database.

You can see from the graph that if the financial system melts down before the end of the year, and I believe this event is quite possible, HYG could plunge.

It turns out, if you go deep on pricing, if you open a Castlight app and you look at these large hospital systems, you will see over and over again, and this has been written in a number of the articles I'm sure you've read, an 8 to 1 delta in pricing, 8 to 1 versus the low end of the market.

These risks and uncertainties include: fluctuations in U.S. and international economies and currencies, our ability to preserve, grow and leverage our brands, potential negative effects of material breaches of our information technology systems if any were to occur, costs associated with, and the successful execution of, the company's initiatives and plans, the acceptance of the company's products by our customers, the impact of competition, coffee, dairy and other raw material prices and availability, the effect of legal proceedings, and other risks detailed in the company filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the «Risk Factors» section of Starbucks Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended September 28, 2014.

If inflation reveals whether an expansion is going to end, the amount of leverage in the system might indicate how bad the subsequent downturn could be.

The reason the system goes along with it is if your option is to pay a little bit of money in NIRP and I end up losing that money, but the bond bubble stays intact and the system continues to function.

For our experience, if a system does not list its credentials, it is more than likely a fraudulent system and should be avoided at all costs as you will probably end up losing your investment rather than making money.

If a particular belief system was the Answer to sobriety, one has to wonder how any person who subscribed to that system ended up a drunk in the first place.

Except that if you were able to be honest with yourself you would realize that 1) if anyone is making that choice, and you are right about the ends, they are making it while depreived of fill knowledge and 2) «Free will» is a nonsensical construct invented to justify such a system without having to think too hard.

All I'm simply stating is, at the end of our journey in life, whether if come naturally, forcefully, or spiritually, we will see whose belief system was right.

Who cares if he was Christian, Muslim, or followed any other belief or non-belief system in the end?

If, for instance, you try to use capitalism to promote greater equality of wealth by imposing on it a steeply progressive, redistributive system of taxation, you frustrate the way in which it rewards its chief dynamic force, the acquisitive impulse, and you are liable to end by making everyone poorer.

Or if, to take another example, you try to redistribute power within capitalism by balancing managerial authority by trade union privileges, you either choke the entrepreneurial spirit or you eliminate profits — the system's lifeblood — or, as a rule, you do both, and so again you end by making everyone poorer.

Nothing so clearly unveils Hegel's system as an apocalyptic system as does this ending, but such an ultimate ending is unique to apocalypticism, for even if it parallels archaic visions of eternal return, it wholly differs from all primordial vision in knowing an absolute and final ending, an ending which is apocalypse itself.

That Man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental collocations of atoms; that no fire, no heroism, no intensity of thought and feeling, can preserve an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruins — all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.

With the coming of television, people were further encouraged to meet the needs of capitalism: to consume without end, to use up, throw away and buy again; to repress individuality so as to not question the process which provided an endless stream of products; to seek the immediate and the sensational, changing the channel every few seconds if it did not provide immediate stimulation; and, above all, never to ask questions about the real meaning of the system itself.

That man is the product of causes which had no prevision of the end they were achieving; that his origin, his growth, his hopes and fears, his loves and his beliefs, are but the outcome of accidental concatenations of atoms; that no force, no heroism, no intensity of thought or feeling, can presume an individual life beyond the grave; that all the labors of the age, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noon - day brightness of human genius, are destined to extinction in the vast death of the solar system, and that the whole temple of Man's achievement must inevitably be buried beneath the debris of a universe in ruin... all these things, if not quite beyond dispute, are yet so nearly certain, that no philosophy which rejects them can hope to stand.

OK I say this if your religion was not working in your country and you come too USA too seek a better life for you and your family your man made religion hasFAILED YOU.because if I say if your religion is the be all end all there is no need too come too USA too seek a BETTER LIFE OR LIFESTYLE YOU WOULD BE SUPER BLESSED IN YOUR FALSE HOOD MAN MADE RELIGIOUS RELIGION PHONY SYSTEM OF GIMMICKS AND GAMES DREAMING AND SCHEMING STRESS STRUGGLES AND STRAINS RELIGION WORLDWIDE RELIGION HAS DONE MORE DESTRUCTION AND DEATH AND POVERTY SICKNESS THEN LEARNING THE WHOLE TRUTHS ABOUT WISDOM

The author of Into the Dark: Seeing the Sacred in the Top Films of the 21st Century, Detweiler prepared us for the upcoming week: «If the Hollywood studio system can be said to dispense the wisdom of happy endings where justice prevails, offering some comfort to the afflicted, then the wisdom of Sundance tends to present the opposite: afflicting the comfortable.»

Mr. Fitzpatrick says that «we would not react patiently to a German who excused his reluctance to use force in 1942 to free concentration camp inmates if he argued that he was convinced at the time that he could do more good by working within the system to end Nazi control than by risking his own arrest and imprisonment in an armed strike to free a few dozen inmates scheduled for the gas chambers on a single morning.»

Now, if you're downright obsessive about your knives and have many different kinds, then you may end up selecting a sharpening system that has the capability to use many different kinds of sharpening stones.

With a political fight threatening the Murray - Darling Basin Plan, we asked a constitutional lawyer if states can withdraw and what it might mean for South Australia at the lower end of the river system.

It's difficult to blame Ozil for the difficulties he's faced at Arsenal without looking at the big picture... like the fans, he too was lied to by Wenger... there is no doubt in my mind that he was told by Wenger that he was trying desperately to recreate our earlier success by acquiring players that fit the system he ran when Henry was in his prime... as we know this hasn't happened... in order for Ozl to flourish he needs some speed up front, forwards that can make intelligent runs, a boss in the midfield to compensate for his obvious defensive liabilities and defenders who can transition from defence to offence quickly and efficiently... much like he had in Real and with the German National squad... unfortunately he ended up on a squad that has a striker who plays with his back to goal, very few intelligent runs into the box, minus Sanchez, no one to take pressure off him in the midfield, once Cazorla was injured, average defensive midfielders around him, which simply highlighted his lacking defensive qualities and defenders who lack the necessary cutting edge when it comes to transitional passing... instead of blaming Ozil, which is simply too easy, especially considering his mopey disposition, we should be asking ownership and / or Wenger why they brought him in if they didn't intend on doing what was necessary to get the best from him... can you imagine Ozil playing with the likes of Henry, Viera, Petit and Pires, it would be incredibly to watch and even more difficult to stop... so the only thing different between his experiences in Real and with the German team versus his time at Arsenal are the players around him and we all know who is in charge of making those decisions, the Grinch who stole soccer

I think it will end up an expensive mismatch to keep Ingram if the Chargers are actually shifting to a base 4 - 3 system.

because no competition for spot, if you have two good players in one position, d one playing will b fully awaere that if he doesn't perform to expectation, there is another good guy waiting to topple him, hence d one playing is contious of DAT, then why allow contracts to linger on, get rid of unproductive players who ate on free salaries, walcot, iwobi, mattasarka, and buy players you can use, end carzola contract and channel d money elsewhere, too many leakages in d system, y waisting money for noting, all these is asene fault, he is the coach.

Arsenal may need to switch back to the 4 -4-2 system of playing, if they wish to end games scoring as much goals as they were known for in the past.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

doctor prescribed him and he admitted it and they ended up not finding anything in his system if i recall.

If we say Evans isn't allowed to return to his position because of the success and riches it can bring; where would that thought process end and what does that say for our whole justice system in general?

I think we were all relieved when the Frenchman finally decided to give the increasingly popular back three system a go towards the end of last season, with no small success, and you could well argue that if he had done so earlier then we may have finished a lot closer to the top of the Premier League.

They could end up being very complimentary players in that system and if they jive well then their values may not be affected.»

In the end, all systems work — if you have enough talent.

Look, we get Ottawa's system may not be the most fun to watch, but at the end of the day the Senators will have to find a way to generate more offensive chances like they did in Game 1 if they want to stay alive here.

And, in the end, all systems don't work — if the talent can't execute.

If the end result is a better analysis of the quality of teams and thus a better system of admitting teams to the tournament, then I have to give the whole thing a thumbs up.

Only 3 points and two league positions separate the two but if Chelsea wins Liverpool might find themselves 4 points behind the top 4 teams by the end of the weekend which makes it a must win for Liverpool while Chelsea will be more than happy with a draw to get this difficult away game out of their system.

If the wires are faulty, too long or too thin you can easily end up with distorted sound coming through the system.

If the city has done work on the water system in your neighborhood in the past few years, you've likely gotten a little pamphlet stuck to your door, informing you about the process and, if you bother to read to the end, what you can do to avoid problems with lead in the wateIf the city has done work on the water system in your neighborhood in the past few years, you've likely gotten a little pamphlet stuck to your door, informing you about the process and, if you bother to read to the end, what you can do to avoid problems with lead in the wateif you bother to read to the end, what you can do to avoid problems with lead in the water.

The Children and Family Court Advisory and Support Service (CAFCASS) has the role of championing children's best interests in the family court system — so if you end up in court fighting for custody of your child, or if the local authority takes out care proceedings, a CAFCASS social worker will be assigned to the case.

I'd still prefer to take supplements myself than give it to the baby (the vit D drops were enough of a pain in the ass) but, if either one of us, on an American meat heavy diet, ends up anemic, it's not a perfect system.

The benefits are that they're so easy to use, so you may end up using cloth diapers longer than you would if you had a two - piece system.

Our soakers snap into the top and / or bottom of the diaper shell (if desired) to keep them in place for mobile babies and toddlers and when snapped in at both ends create an All In One system