Sentences with phrase «endangering human welfare»

Enable the EPA to declare that CO2 emissions are endangering human welfare The EPA recommended Bush make this declaration last year, but his administration ignored the request.

Not exact matches

Pruitt said he wouldn't prejudge what that review would mean for the EPA's landmark 2009 conclusion that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare.

WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, June 14, 2016 — American Humane, the country's first national humane organization, and the first to create historic protections for animals on farms and ranches, film and television, and other environments where animals live in human care, is announcing today the launch of a global program dedicated to helping ensure the welfare and humane treatment of the remarkable, endangered and disappearing animals living in the world's zoos and aquariums.

Despite concluding in 2009 that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare, a finding that triggered their regulation under the 1970 Clean Air Act, it has taken years for the administration to take on the nation's fleet of power plants.

His growing list of executive orders and regulatory reviews is rapidly reversing eight years of Obama «Clean Power Plan,» «social cost of carbon,» and other regulatory decrees; laying the foundation for reversing the EPA's absurd finding that plant - fertilizing carbon dioxide «endangers» human health and welfare; and putting the United States in a position to lead the world back from the brink of Paris pact pandemonium and wealth redistribution.

It looks like EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt has a good procedural argument for reopening the Obama era false finding that CO2 emissions endanger human health and welfare.

That emailed version said greenhouse gases could indeed endanger human health and welfare — a finding that would trigger a regulatory rescue (a regulatory train wreck, said the White House) by the EPA under the Clean Air Act.

Fred Palmer's Claim # 1: «Using coal for electricity enables people to live longer and better and drives the lowest U.S. electricity costs for any major fuel,» while EPA's proposed power plan «would endanger human health and welfare by making electricity — one of life's necessities — scarce and expensive.»