Until US policymakers move
beyond the Cato - style climate logical fallacies, the EPA regulation of large GHG emitters via the
endangerment finding is the only large - scale emissions reductions effort we have.
It is worth noting that the fact that there is a legitimate argument for why EPA can't regulate
beyond the fence - line is what distinguishes this CPP scenario from, say, any attempt to reverse the
endangerment finding, which would be doomed to failure given that such a reversal must explain how its new analysis is correct.