They include «failing to disclose that the legal work is routinely referred to other lawyers for a fee rather
than being performed by the lawyer;» «misleading about the size of the lawyer's practice or the areas of law in which the lawyer provides services;» «referring to fee arrangements offered to
clients without qualifications;» and «advertising awards and
endorsements from third parties without disclaimers or qualifications.»
Feb. 8, 2010)(dismissing disciplinary complaints against Connecticut lawyers for participating in ClearBankruptcy.com and TotalBankruptcy.com, noting that the websites did not endorse participating lawyers but bore disclaimers to the contrary and required potential
clients to initiate contact by visiting the websites and voluntarily providing information); Arizona Op. 11 - 02 (lawyer may join an internet group advertisement listing no more
than one lawyer for each zip code if program does not imply
endorsement, if it is labelled as advertising, and if lawyer has paid for exclusive zip code listing); District of Columbia Op. 302 (lawyers may pursue legal work through paying a fee to access web page where potential
clients post requests for bids on legal work); Nassau County (N.Y.) Ethics Op. 01 - 4, 17 Law.